Fork me on GitHub

Wikimedia IRC logs browser - #wikimedia-tech

Filter:
Start date
End date

Displaying 208 items:

2018-09-12 13:05:40 <Stryn> not very useful maintenance banner
2018-09-12 13:06:04 <Stryn> (linking to Meta:Example)
2018-09-12 13:06:12 <Reedy> ?
2018-09-12 13:06:20 <Reedy> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Tech/Server_switch_2018
2018-09-12 13:06:35 <Stryn> When I click the banner it goes to Meta:Example
2018-09-12 13:06:49 <Stryn> oh now it works
2018-09-12 13:06:55 <Reedy> yay computers
2018-09-12 13:07:13 <Stryn> https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=18375154&oldid=18374580&rcid=12410435
2018-09-12 14:00:06 <wm-bot> Technical Advice IRC meeting starting in 60 minutes in channel #wikimedia-tech, hosts: @chiborg & @amir1 - all questions welcome, more infos: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Advice_IRC_Meeting
2018-09-12 14:36:25 <DaBPunkt> guys? you promised us 1 hour of recreation – where it is? ;)
2018-09-12 14:37:03 <Krenair> I don't think it's expected to be read-only mode for the entire hour.
2018-09-12 14:37:05 <apergos> we have started the data center switchover procedure
2018-09-12 14:37:21 <apergos> I will give a heads up in this channel when we are about to set read-only (not quite yet)
2018-09-12 14:37:21 <mark> it's in #wikimedia-operations :)
2018-09-12 14:37:50 <DaBPunkt> ok :)
2018-09-12 14:37:55 <apergos> if you would like to follow along, most of the activity is taking place in #wikimedia-operations, but please lurk only, no chatter
2018-09-12 14:37:59 <Krenair> There are steps before going read-only and there are steps after going back to read-write
2018-09-12 14:41:26 <apergos> read-only mode shortly
2018-09-12 14:45:53 <Krenair> read-only mode
2018-09-12 14:45:58 <apergos> we should now be read-only, folks
2018-09-12 14:46:02 <apergos> enjoy your editing break
2018-09-12 14:46:08 <DaBPunkt> :)
2018-09-12 14:46:24 <DaBPunkt> good luck!
2018-09-12 14:47:10 <apergos> :-)
2018-09-12 14:49:06 <Krenair> I guess that's one thing for having wikitech be separate - SAL still works when the other wikis are read-only
2018-09-12 14:50:05 <wm-bot> Technical Advice IRC meeting starting in 10 minutes in channel #wikimedia-tech, hosts: @chiborg & @amir1 - all questions welcome, more infos: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Advice_IRC_Meeting
2018-09-12 14:52:21 <apergos> read-only period is over
2018-09-12 14:52:27 <apergos> back to editing!
2018-09-12 14:52:42 <DaBPunkt> thanks
2018-09-12 15:00:55 <Amir1> o/
2018-09-12 15:01:11 <Amir1> Welcome to the technical advice IRC meeting
2018-09-12 15:02:44 <Nemo_bis> I propose a minute of mourning for copyright ;)
2018-09-12 15:03:16 <Amir1> lol. Indeed
2018-09-12 15:03:24 <Der_Keks> Did everything work till now with the server change?
2018-09-12 15:04:26 <Amir1> Der_Keks: Yes, there was a short down time before the datacenter switchover due to varnish misbehaving
2018-09-12 15:04:30 <Amir1> but that was unrelated
2018-09-12 15:04:31 <d3r1ck> o/
2018-09-12 15:05:00 <Amir1> d3r1ck: Hey
2018-09-12 15:05:14 <d3r1ck> Amir1: Hey, seems you've been really busy lately :)
2018-09-12 15:05:26 <d3r1ck> Nemo_bis: :(
2018-09-12 15:06:05 <Amir1> Yeah :(
2018-09-12 15:06:08 <ShakespeareFan00> Okay so
2018-09-12 15:06:20 <Krenair> ok
2018-09-12 15:06:21 <_joe_> Nemo_bis: indeed :(
2018-09-12 15:06:23 <ShakespeareFan00> A Datacenter move
2018-09-12 15:06:26 <ShakespeareFan00> Thanks
2018-09-12 15:06:30 <apergos> this was a planned switchover
2018-09-12 15:06:39 <ShakespeareFan00> I also wanted to ask if something technical was feasible?
2018-09-12 15:06:41 <apergos> we'll leave traffic in the new datacenter for a few weeks
2018-09-12 15:06:45 <apergos> then switch back
2018-09-12 15:07:20 <apergos> the technical advice meeting is in here happening right now, so maybe you can ask that question
2018-09-12 15:07:29 <apergos> I think Amir1 is facilitating
2018-09-12 15:07:47 <ShakespeareFan00> Oh sorry to intrude
2018-09-12 15:07:54 <apergos> no, you're welcome here
2018-09-12 15:08:08 <Amir1> Yes, How can I help?
2018-09-12 15:08:31 <ShakespeareFan00> My question would be whether it's possible to disable certain functionality in Mediawiki for a very wide range of IP's?
2018-09-12 15:09:00 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: That really depends on what functionalities AFAIK
2018-09-12 15:09:06 <Reedy> Block the range
2018-09-12 15:09:11 <Reedy> That stops a lot of funcationality
2018-09-12 15:09:27 <ShakespeareFan00> Such as for example preventing uploads from an entire renage of schools
2018-09-12 15:09:32 <apergos> side-eyes Reedy
2018-09-12 15:09:34 <Amir1> True, also ratelimit but it's a global thing
2018-09-12 15:09:39 <ShakespeareFan00> due to problematic uploads for example?
2018-09-12 15:09:50 <ShakespeareFan00> (Or in extermis an entire geogrpahical region)
2018-09-12 15:10:07 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: if you're hosting your own wiki, maybe you can use abuse filter
2018-09-12 15:10:19 <ShakespeareFan00> I'm not
2018-09-12 15:10:29 <ShakespeareFan00> This was to do with English Wikipedia
2018-09-12 15:10:33 <Amir1> I don't know if we expose IP range to abuse filter for third party installation
2018-09-12 15:10:52 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: hmm, What you're saying will be possible soon
2018-09-12 15:10:53 <DaBPunkt> ShakespeareFan00: can’t abuse-filter help?
2018-09-12 15:11:05 <Amir1> due to implementation of partial blocks
2018-09-12 15:11:08 <ShakespeareFan00> Amir1: Also IP range-blocks wouldn't affected registered accounts?
2018-09-12 15:11:15 <Krenair> You could almost certainly write such code into the config
2018-09-12 15:11:35 <Krenair> use some hook relating to uploads, check IP range, stop stuff working if bad
2018-09-12 15:11:38 <ShakespeareFan00> Currently I think on English Wikipedia you need an account to upload anyway
2018-09-12 15:11:43 <Amir1> To second what Krenair said, this has been done in WMF before in severe cases
2018-09-12 15:11:54 <ShakespeareFan00> Thanks
2018-09-12 15:12:11 <ShakespeareFan00> What I'm about to say may be controversial
2018-09-12 15:12:39 <ShakespeareFan00> Generally on Wikipedia and WMF projects, blocking or function disabling is done reactively
2018-09-12 15:12:41 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: yes, also you can limit upload to autoconfirmed users or define a new user group that automatically is added
2018-09-12 15:13:01 <Amir1> for example some wikis gives out the uploader right after you have done N edits
2018-09-12 15:13:05 <Amir1> (autoamtically)
2018-09-12 15:13:08 <ShakespeareFan00> As some people may heard the EU Parliment voted to approve certain copyright changes.
2018-09-12 15:13:40 <ShakespeareFan00> I was wondering therefore from a technical perspective if it's possible to bar the whole of the EU region from uploading or adding external links
2018-09-12 15:14:00 <Krenair> no people will just use a US IP
2018-09-12 15:14:19 <Amir1> technically it's possible but community-wise, I'm not so sure of that
2018-09-12 15:14:24 <ShakespeareFan00> Or as with the "Chinese Firewall" a VPN
2018-09-12 15:14:47 <chiborg> ShakespeareFan00 And I fear it's not about where the user sits who uploads the content but more about the platform. You'd have to block wikipedia in the eu.
2018-09-12 15:14:53 <ShakespeareFan00> I'm not saying it's sound on policy grounds
2018-09-12 15:15:03 <Krenair> ... yes a VPN can give you an IP in a different country
2018-09-12 15:15:24 <ShakespeareFan00> chiborg: Which is the crux of the issue
2018-09-12 15:15:45 <ShakespeareFan00> WMF being blocked in the whole of the EU, would be catastrophic PR
2018-09-12 15:15:55 <Krenair> look
2018-09-12 15:15:59 <Reedy> I think we're getting ahead of ourselves
2018-09-12 15:16:00 <Krenair> this is not a technical decision
2018-09-12 15:16:11 <andre__> ShakespeareFan00: it's not "WMF".
2018-09-12 15:16:35 <Amir1> Yes, let's talk about technical issues
2018-09-12 15:16:58 <apergos> yep, this is a 'technical advice meeting' :-)
2018-09-12 15:17:02 <ShakespeareFan00> Krenair: Okay... my next technical question... would be whether it's feasible to have geo-aware templates?
2018-09-12 15:17:21 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: technically it's almost impossible
2018-09-12 15:17:23 <ShakespeareFan00> That display different content based on a percived location
2018-09-12 15:17:28 <Reedy> woo, caching
2018-09-12 15:17:31 <Amir1> due to how our caching works
2018-09-12 15:17:33 <Krenair> that would be a varnish caching problem
2018-09-12 15:17:36 <Reedy> plus lol geoip
2018-09-12 15:17:42 <Krenair> ^
2018-09-12 15:17:46 <Amir1> ParserCache, Varnish and everythin
2018-09-12 15:18:04 <Krenair> yeah that too
2018-09-12 15:18:15 <mutante> that being said, we do have banners based on location
2018-09-12 15:18:23 <ShakespeareFan00> My intended use-case for geo-aware templates would be the edit-notice for BLP articles as the UK has different libel laws to the US
2018-09-12 15:18:29 <Krenair> yeah but I think those work client-side?
2018-09-12 15:18:48 <chiborg> Banners are loaded client-side after the main page content has loaded.
2018-09-12 15:18:53 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: you can "replace" it later based on javascript
2018-09-12 15:19:02 <Amir1> after the page is loaded
2018-09-12 15:19:10 <ShakespeareFan00> Okay so it's a template coding issue
2018-09-12 15:19:17 <Amir1> that's how banners work. Is it correct chiborg ?
2018-09-12 15:19:36 <ShakespeareFan00> Thanks for having the patience to respond
2018-09-12 15:19:50 <ShakespeareFan00> In the US the warning would have one wording...
2018-09-12 15:19:51 <chiborg> Yes, banners can have JavaScript in them that could theoretically replace any content on the wiki page.
2018-09-12 15:19:58 <DaBPunkt> May I ask if the db-switch is completly over?
2018-09-12 15:20:03 <Amir1> there wasn't any need for patience. That's why we are here
2018-09-12 15:20:09 <[1997kB]> Is it really read-only? I can see edits in recent changes.
2018-09-12 15:20:16 <Krenair> DaBPunkt, well they're talking about getting rid of the banner
2018-09-12 15:20:25 <Krenair> [1997kB], it was for a few minutes, not anymore
2018-09-12 15:20:26 <Amir1> DaBPunkt: It's moved to the new datacenter now and it will switch back next month
2018-09-12 15:20:29 <DaBPunkt> [1997kB]: the read-only-phase is over
2018-09-12 15:20:34 <DaBPunkt> Amir1: ok.
2018-09-12 15:20:44 <Amir1> so everything is stable like we are in a plane in sky, not landing yet
2018-09-12 15:20:47 <ShakespeareFan00> In the UK the edit-notice for a BLP, would have an additional wording, pointing out that the UK has strong libel laws and thus if you put in lies you could get sued...
2018-09-12 15:20:52 <[1997kB]> ah ok..
2018-09-12 15:20:55 <Amir1> [1997kB]: it's not, anymore
2018-09-12 15:21:13 <ShakespeareFan00> If geo-aware edit-notices aren't feasible... I'll shut up
2018-09-12 15:21:14 <tgr> enwiki has geoaware sitenotices via JS, adapting that to templates should not be hard
2018-09-12 15:21:34 <Amir1> ShakespeareFan00: you can add it via Mediawiki:Common.js
2018-09-12 15:21:54 <ShakespeareFan00> tgr: And a simmilar approach could be applied to other edit-notices and UI components?
2018-09-12 15:21:55 <Amir1> it'll be added after the page is loaded and it's more of a hack but it works
2018-09-12 15:22:06 <ShakespeareFan00> Like Special:Upload
2018-09-12 15:22:13 <Amir1> Yes
2018-09-12 15:22:26 <tgr> in general though edit warnings about malicious intent scare away well-intentioned contributors and are unlikely to convince ill-intentioned ones
2018-09-12 15:22:42 <tgr> at best they will try harder to hide their tracks
2018-09-12 15:22:45 <ShakespeareFan00> Okay... It's technically feasible, so I'll take this to Village Pump as it's a project issue not a global one?
2018-09-12 15:22:59 <Reedy> For the EU stuff?
2018-09-12 15:23:02 <Reedy> Or just blocking schools?
2018-09-12 15:23:38 <ShakespeareFan00> Reedy: As a region wide block wouldn't necssarily pass WP:POINT
2018-09-12 15:24:28 <apergos> reminder, tech questions pelase
2018-09-12 15:24:42 <ShakespeareFan00> Reedy: Yes this was about putting a warning on upload if an account was uplaoding from an IP subject to a range block
2018-09-12 15:24:42 <apergos> this meeting is only one hour
2018-09-12 15:24:57 <tgr> note that EU laws have not changed
2018-09-12 15:25:21 <ShakespeareFan00> I'll move this discussion elsewhere as the technical aspects were answered.
2018-09-12 15:25:23 <ShakespeareFan00> out
2018-09-12 15:25:41 <Amir1> #wikpedia-en would be a good venue
2018-09-12 15:25:53 <tgr> the Parliament voted on what suggestion tosubmit to the Council as the next step of the copyright reform
2018-09-12 15:26:28 <tgr> it's a long process that's nowhere near the end yet, any blocking or interface change would be terribly premature even if it is warranted otherwise
2018-09-12 15:27:17 <legoktm> tgr: so what's the next steps for the bill? I'm not familiar with EU lawmaking
2018-09-12 15:29:29 <ShakespeareFan00> legoktm: I was advise to keep this channel on technical issues... there are other channels for 'policy' related disscussions
2018-09-12 15:29:38 <Amir1> "Sometimes you lose an argument. Sometimes you lose an election. The path that this country has taken has never been a straight line. We zig and zag, and sometimes we move in ways that some people think is forward and others think is moving back. And that's okay. " I like this quote by Obama. It seems fitting here
2018-09-12 15:30:11 <Amir1> True
2018-09-12 15:30:26 <Amir1> Any technical questions so far?
2018-09-12 15:30:32 <chiborg> legoktm : See this thread for opinion and what the next steps are: https://twitter.com/doctorow/status/1039845484431519744
2018-09-12 15:30:49 <chiborg> Any technical questions:
2018-09-12 15:30:52 <chiborg> ?
2018-09-12 15:31:05 <tgr> legoktm: the parliament and the council negotiate changes, then there will be a final vote on the end result, at which point the new law is either accepted or discarded entirely
2018-09-12 15:31:28 <tgr> Julia Reda's site is always a great resource on EU copyright stuff: https://juliareda.eu/2018/09/ep-endorses-upload-filters/
2018-09-12 15:31:59 <paravoid> that's my understanding as well, but for extra clarity s/law/directive/
2018-09-12 15:32:06 <[1997kB]> When labs will support IPv6?
2018-09-12 15:32:31 <paravoid> sorry, just saw the "please keep it technical" comment, my apologies
2018-09-12 15:33:02 <legoktm> Sorry for the distraction, and thanks for the links :)
2018-09-12 15:33:05 <Amir1> [1997kB]: hmm, what do you mean by IPv6 support exactly?
2018-09-12 15:33:33 <Amir1> isn't it possible to login to labs via an IPv6 connection?
2018-09-12 15:34:08 <Krenair> Amir1, no, there's no IPv6 networking in labs right now
2018-09-12 15:34:27 <[1997kB]> Amir1: like in ACC we can't see requester's IPv6, it shows IPv6, and due which we can't see blocks too..
2018-09-12 15:34:38 <Krenair> you mean it shows IPv4
2018-09-12 15:34:49 <[1997kB]> yeah, sorry..
2018-09-12 15:34:54 <Krenair> possibly after the neutron migration they can add IPv6 support
2018-09-12 15:35:10 <Krenair> that's being worked on
2018-09-12 15:35:23 <apergos> here's a mediawiki-vagrant question (is this a good time for it?): I've gotten a timeout from composer in trying to apply the wikidata role, is this sort of thing common and is there a known/easy workaround? this happens when trying to provision the role
2018-09-12 15:35:24 <Krenair> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167293
2018-09-12 15:35:32 <Krenair> and you want https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T37947
2018-09-12 15:36:15 <legoktm> apergos: https://getcomposer.org/doc/03-cli.md#composer-process-timeout
2018-09-12 15:36:32 <apergos> yeah that's modifying the role
2018-09-12 15:36:47 <apergos> but it seems that it times out (or it did yesterday) in trying to get some psy something from github
2018-09-12 15:37:00 <Amir1> that ticket looks ancient
2018-09-12 15:37:03 <apergos> it's a tiny repo
2018-09-12 15:37:05 <legoktm> Maybe because github was down yesterday?
2018-09-12 15:37:24 <apergos> hm. maybe, I have not tried again today, just a few times yesterday with the same result
2018-09-12 15:37:36 <legoktm> https://status.github.com/messages
2018-09-12 15:37:49 <Krenair> it is a five digit ticket
2018-09-12 15:38:30 <Krenair> and yeah, the request has been open since pretty much when labs was opened for public use AFAIK
2018-09-12 15:38:33 <Amir1> [1997kB]: To recap, It would be great if you follow https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T37947 and ping people
2018-09-12 15:38:43 <apergos> intersting, thanks
2018-09-12 15:39:42 <legoktm> That would be my guess mostly, it really shouldn't hit the timeout in normal operation IMO
2018-09-12 15:40:45 <apergos> certainly not for the small amount of stuff in that repo
2018-09-12 15:49:12 <[1997kB]> ok, I'll.. thanks. Thought mentioning it here would speed up little bit.
2018-09-12 15:50:49 <Amir1> Unfortunately it's hard offer help on this matter as it's big and way outside of my knowledge
2018-09-12 15:51:02 <Amir1> *it's hard for me to
2018-09-12 16:00:11 <chiborg> And that's the end of the Technical Advice Meeting. Thank yo all for your questions and engagement!
2018-09-12 16:01:47 <apergos> thanks for hosting, that was very convenient
2018-09-12 16:02:29 <Amir1> See you next week o/
2018-09-12 17:29:49 <legoktm> andre__: how many GCI tasks do we need ahead of time?
2018-09-12 18:01:44 <andre__> legoktm: I don't know yet - last year it was 75 at the start
2018-09-12 18:01:51 <andre__> the more, the better :-/
2018-09-12 18:02:21 <legoktm> alright, I'll find some more :)
2018-09-12 18:02:50 <andre__> legoktm: thanks so much!!
2018-09-12 20:02:29 <legoktm> "Risk Rating N/A" - that's new in Phabricator
2018-09-12 20:05:07 <paladox> legoktm https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204138
2018-09-12 20:08:16 <legoktm> paladox: thanks, commented there
2018-09-12 20:08:23 <paladox> your welcome :
2018-09-12 20:08:24 <paladox> :)

This page is generated from SQL logs, you can also download static txt files from here