[16:35:54] <anomie>	 bd808: Do we want to try to merge $wgAuthenticationTokenVersion before wmf.12 (in case they get things fixed today)?
[16:36:42] <bd808>	 anomie: it would probably be nice. Did you and csteipp work out whatever he softly objected to?
[16:36:58] * bd808 is still slogging through emails and backlogs
[16:37:02] <anomie>	 He said he didn't object to it as-is.
[19:25:00] <robla>	 anomie: wouldn't be better to have an RFC for SessionManager and AuthManager before attempting a remerge?
[19:25:12] <bd808>	 we did have an RFC
[19:25:58] <bd808>	 I'm trying not to be crabby and contrary, but jeebus
[19:26:02] <ori>	 an RfC seems like overkill, the overall design went through quite a bit of review
[19:26:20] <ori>	 the only thing that is controversial at this point is the deployment strategy, and that isn't good fodder for an RfC discussion
[19:26:47] <robla>	 I disagree, but I'll drop it for now.
[19:26:47] <ori>	 (IMHO, etc.)
[19:27:18] <bd808>	 this multi-headed debate in multiple channels (irc, phab, email, hangouts) is why I felt that reverting was the nuclear option.
[19:27:31] <ori>	 no slack?!?!
[19:27:33] <ori>	 get with it, man
[19:28:10] <bd808>	 the plan of record agreed to with the releng team is to put it back as soon as .12 is branched
[19:28:53] <robla>	 bd808: where are you discussing the plan of record?
[19:29:06] <bd808>	 greg-g announced it yesterday
[19:29:48] <bd808>	 "[Engineering] Status and plan of SessionManager and 1.27-wmf.11 and wmf.12"
[19:30:22] * robla reads
[19:37:40] <robla>	 hmm...ok, I'll drop it
[19:53:27] <hashar>	 anomie: bd808: Chad is about to  cut the branch.  Would you mind hoping in #wikimedia-releng so we sync your requirements / get stuff merged ?
[19:56:24] <hashar>	 will double check   $wgAuthenticationTokenVersion stuff lands