[00:27:07] <ostriches>	 Would anyone be able to have a look at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/323982/? Or may I add you to look later?
[00:27:42] <Reedy>	 zomg
[00:27:55] <Reedy>	 Do we have any existing extensions that don't match $name.php or extension.json?
[00:28:02] <Reedy>	 I'm guessing not, for WMF purposes at least
[00:29:19] <ostriches>	 Well, nice thing is you can support both
[00:29:22] <ostriches>	 If you merge this patch
[00:29:38] <ostriches>	 Then we can do --extension-dir to pick up *most* and --list-file to catch the weird leftovers
[00:29:50] <Reedy>	 yeah
[00:29:53] <Reedy>	 but that's what I'm saying
[00:29:56] <Reedy>	 I don't think we have any :P
[00:30:16] <Reedy>	 like, none :)
[00:30:34] <ostriches>	 Either way, patch should land heh
[00:30:40] <Reedy>	 Not even wikitech shit
[00:30:58] <ostriches>	 Wikidata? It did some weird stuff with $wgExtensionMessagesFiles
[00:31:37] <Reedy>	 Well, yeah, that's the only then..
[00:31:40] <Reedy>	 Cause it does it's weird meta repo
[00:31:51] <Reedy>	 $wgExtensionEntryPointListFiles[] = "$IP/extensions/Wikidata/extension-list-wikidata";
[00:32:09] <ostriches>	 Yeah, that's why
[00:32:23] <Reedy>	 damn it wikidata
[00:32:24] <Reedy>	 :D
[00:32:42] <ostriches>	 Hey, clearing out 90% of the lists will make me happy
[00:32:46] <ostriches>	 Makes my life easier
[00:33:22] <Reedy>	 :)
[00:33:36] <Reedy>	 surely it's 75%? :P
[00:34:05] <ostriches>	 Whateverrrr
[00:34:16] <ostriches>	 extension-list makes deploying hard.
[00:34:24] <ostriches>	 Have to deploy to both branches at once for l10n to not break
[00:34:32] <ostriches>	 extension-list makes that go away
[00:34:39] <ostriches>	 (and keeps useless l10n from a branch)
[00:34:40] <Reedy>	 yeah, I don't disagree ;)
[16:35:04] <anomie>	 bd808: meeting?
[16:35:22] <bd808>	 crap, on my way
[17:46:00] <MatmaRex>	 anomie: hide-if is horrible.
[17:46:43] <anomie>	 MatmaRex: How so?
[17:47:00] <MatmaRex>	 anomie: i've solved the issue with cloners and javascript, i'll update the patch soon. but then i noticed that without javascript, hide-if is basically completely incompatible with html5 form validation attributes (which are used by OOUI forms, and which will be used by normal forms after https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/323408/3)
[17:48:21] <MatmaRex>	 (and so are cloners, but that's just a bug and it's fixable, and not fundamental incompatiility)
[17:49:44] <MatmaRex>	 if you have a checkbox field A, and field B that is required, but hidden if A is unchecked – that's impossible to express with html5 form validation. the only thing you can do is remove the validation on B (or on the entire form).
[17:57:49] <legoktm>	 ori: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T152222
[18:28:06] <anomie>	 MatmaRex: In ooui, is there a standard way to explain why a TextInputWidget's value failed validation?
[18:28:51] <MatmaRex>	 anomie: wrap it in FieldLayout and set the 'errors' config option to something (or use setErrors())
[18:29:02] <MatmaRex>	 anomie: i think HTMLForm uses that