[20:15:24] I have been wondering about this for a looong time. Can someone enlighten me? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T175745 [20:19:34] DanielK_WMDE__: My *guess* would be "try to avoid an edit conflict response whenever possible" [20:19:44] Given how long ago it was, I'd ask brion or TimStarling if they remember. [20:19:56] They're ridiculously annoying to unwind for the average user. [20:20:38] no_justification: just overwriting the previous edit is better? and leave it to the user to notice, and then somehow merge after the fact? that seems a lot worse. [20:20:44] So [20:20:51] DanielK_WMDE__: I said, guessing :) [20:20:55] Back in the day if you used the edit form and saved [20:20:57] Yay, uncle brion here for story time :D [20:21:01] * no_justification settles in [20:21:02] \o/ [20:21:05] And then clicked back and made a further change and save again [20:21:09] It would edit conflict [20:21:14] I think this was a hack for that [20:21:32] But yeah if it fucks you up it's... not pretty [20:21:59] ah... that would work because "back" took you back to a text field that still had the modified text, which you could then adjust? [20:22:08] this was before tabbed browsing, yes? [20:22:16] this seems to be doing more harm then good... [20:22:22] Yeah Netscape 4 days [20:22:31] It may be,,. Unwise now. [20:22:39] brion: would you put that on the task, for posterity? or should i just copy what you just said here? [20:23:11] Copy paste, I'm afk and on crappy iPhone kbd 🙀 [20:23:40] the relevant query is nasty and unreliable, i'd love to kill it! [20:23:52] ...instad of porting it to the new RevisionStore [20:24:32] :) [20:25:54] brion: done, thank you! [20:26:36] brion: i spend like half an hour to find the commit that introduced this. only to find that it was introduced by the *first" commit ever. [20:27:02] fun times ;) [20:32:32] I'm sure people do still use the back button [20:33:12] I think I hit this as a feature before I ever heard about it being a bug [20:33:43] I think we broke it by accident once, and people complained [20:34:35] of course it could be more specific, you could easily detect separate tabs/windows [21:12:13] Warning: Using deprecated fallback handling for comment rc_comment [Called from CommentStore::getCommentInternal in /srv/mediawiki/php-1.30.0-wmf.17/includes/CommentStore.php at line 200] in /srv/mediawiki/php-1.30.0-wmf.17/includes/debug/MWDebug.php on line 309 [21:12:22] Yay, more of those [23:03:07] bd808: can't complain about that CR turnaround time :) [23:03:43] tgr: :) it was the kind of change that would conflict really fast [23:04:00] also its something I've thought about doing a dozen times [23:06:43] no_justification: CommentStore is logspamming?