[18:49:15] <legoktm>	 new librarization; https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/405914
[19:05:12] <James_F>	 legoktm: Just to be difficult, but is there a reason we don't create those via a `git filter-branch`?
[19:05:45] <James_F>	 It'd preserve authorship/blame and give some context to "why is this line like this?" head-scratching in future. :-)
[19:05:53] <legoktm>	 No reason besides we've never tried I think
[19:06:05] <legoktm>	 For ObjectFactory it would work
[19:06:07] <James_F>	 I can try to do it if you want.
[19:06:10] <legoktm>	 sure
[19:06:20] <James_F>	 (We did it for VE-core and OOUI.)
[19:06:59] <legoktm>	 I'm curious to see how well it would work for things like bagostuff which has been moved all around MediaWiki
[19:07:48] <James_F>	 Yeah, --follow can only go so far. ;-)
[19:31:13] <Krinkle>	 bd808: legoktm: Should be properly archive https://github.com/wikimedia/generator-wikimedia-php-library ?
[19:31:28] <Krinkle>	 (and point to its replacement)
[19:31:53] <Krinkle>	 also, it seems the cookiecutter tool repo isn't replicated to Phab nor GitHub
[19:31:56] <Krinkle>	 getting 404
[19:33:23] <legoktm>	 yes
[19:33:30] <legoktm>	 I thought I set up Phab replication?
[19:37:46] <Krinkle>	 legoktm: Hm.. yeah I see the repo
[19:37:49] <Krinkle>	 from the mediawiki.org doc link
[19:37:55] <Krinkle>	 but diff links from Gerrit do't work
[19:37:57] <Krinkle>	 eg. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/rMCCL92d86aa23d86d740682ee334d78fa25ab6be6a9d
[19:38:03] <Krinkle>	 from https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/405919/
[20:12:41] <James_F>	 legoktm: BTW, "Rewrite 0da76794566d5e4a9990b186e3bc8a9ac98d9979 (12038/80609) (1608 seconds passed, remaining 9159 predicted)" (on the first re-write to move the two files into a new subdirectory called ObjectFactory, then I have to re-run to collapse down to just that one. Yay. 
[20:13:48] <legoktm>	 woot
[20:17:43] <James_F>	 It's almost like MW-core has a lot of commits. :-)
[20:36:11] <SMalyshev>	 Krinkle: do you want to make RFC for the user agents thing? Or should I make one?
[20:42:17] <Krinkle>	 SMalyshev: About whether to do it, or about how to do it?
[20:42:27] <Krinkle>	 I think the how can be resolved within CR
[20:42:50] <SMalyshev>	 how to do it. I don't think whether is questionable?
[20:43:43] <SMalyshev>	 I think it should be documented *somewhere* how one should do the user agents
[20:44:01] <SMalyshev>	 as for where the somewhere is, I don't have much clue
[20:44:56] <SMalyshev>	 as we add more stuff to mediawiki, we probably will have more http client things, and having them using consistent agents is good
[23:15:42] <legoktm>	 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/topic:missing-covers+status:open easy reviews :)
[23:19:18] <James_F>	 legoktm: Now "Rewrite 0d03983dfa906b2da7bc0e53c667978e960ddad2 (53933/80609) (12850 seconds passed, remaining 6355 predicted)" :-(
[23:20:34] <legoktm>	 oh gosh
[23:21:01] <James_F>	 Yeah.
[23:21:04] * James_F sighs.
[23:37:51] <legoktm>	 MaxSem: the test for ApiQueryExtracts::getAllowedParams looks really silly
[23:59:36] <MaxSem>	 phew, not mine :P
[23:59:37] <MaxSem>	 https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-TextExtracts/commit/6bfe60508a7782b04a7db38782af208b61e65e0f#diff-8815bf7e8909b73686ec8442f4b6c731