[01:34:30] AaronSchulz: Notice: Array to string conversion in /srv/mediawiki/php-1.31.0-wmf.21/includes/libs/rdbms/database/position/MySQLMasterPos.php on line 41 :\ [04:34:59] does anyone understand T154552 "ApiLogin should not open master connection to centralauth DB" or have IRC logs which contain the quoted discussion? [04:35:01] T154552: ApiLogin should not open master connection to centralauth DB - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154552 [05:14:05] no_justification: already fixed in master incidentally [05:14:21] harmless aside from log noise though [05:16:45] Good enough for me, thx [05:37:14] Reedy: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/mediawiki-phpunit-php70-jessie/61/console [05:37:51] can we even support phpunit 4 and 6 at the same time? [05:38:26] or maybe we just create our own back-compat aliases for whatever is missing? [05:48:23] TimStarling: Relates to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150506 I think [05:48:31] (for the bot: T150506 ) [05:48:31] T150506: Run lazyImportLocalNames() on creation and run script to backfill them - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150506 [06:06:50] Reedy: so, currently php70 with phpunit 4.x is failing because libtidy changed (https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/409432/ would fix that), everything else passes. Maybe we should try and get php70 voting first, then bump phpunit? [06:26:43] <_joe_> TimStarling: yes, I'll just use meta=siteinfo [06:28:44] <_joe_> I'd just use a review of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/411286/ from either you or legoktm who was added as a reviewer :P [06:29:25] > Yes, the probability that someone runs a 32bit installation and uses and etcd backend with more than 2 trillion changes in it is pretty close to none. [06:29:39] lol [06:33:27] <_joe_> legoktm: pedantic ops discuss unimportant details in a CR :P [13:59:16] Krinkle: The test is *for* MWDebug, so you don't want to mock it too much. And static methods are hard to mock. [13:59:38] Krinkle: A good question would be to figure out why it's being enabled outside of that one test class in the first place. [14:00:18] Looking at the one call to MWDebug::init() in Setup.php, it seems like it shouldn't be. [20:44:40] anomie: Yeah, I'm not sure. [20:44:54] anomie: I recall more tests calling it though, to e.g. verify things like calls to wfDeprecated [20:45:01] But I can't find it anymore [22:08:45] RoanKattouw: [22:08:57] oops. [22:12:12] RoanKattouw, subbu: I'm trying to decide which of your RFCs we should discuss next week. We already kind of announced the change tags RFC, but the tidy RFC issue sounds kind of urgent. What do you think, which one should go first? [22:12:34] I'm happy for Tidy to go ahead of change tags if there is urgency [22:13:05] But I'll let subbu judge that (and whether he's ready to discuss it as early as next week) [22:13:25] thanks .. RoanKattouw yes, useful to have that be done earlier since I want to get it implemented and deployed sooner than later. [22:14:13] ok, excellent, i'll announce it like that then [22:18:34] didn't realize multiple wikis (including ruwiki which already has remex) are affected by it -- my mistake for not submitting it earlier. but, thanks RoanKattouw for letting me cut ahead. [23:34:27] subbu: So have we / are we reverting ruwiki back for the time being, or is that decision still pending? [23:36:14] Pending. I am torn about it. [23:37:03] let me post on ruwiki vp and ask. [23:46:41] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9#Question_about_temporarily_reverting_Remex_on_ruwiki