[00:02:38] <Reedy>	 $licenses = file_get_contents( 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spdx/license-list-data/master/json/licenses.json' );
[00:02:38] <Reedy>	 $lic = json_decode( $licenses );
[00:02:38] <Reedy>	 foreach ( $lic->licenses as $l ) { echo $l->licenseId . "\n"; }
[00:02:40] <Reedy>	 easy as that
[00:03:09] <legoktm>	 ish
[00:03:14] <legoktm>	 there are also modifiers
[00:03:21] <legoktm>	 + for example
[00:03:29] <legoktm>	 or -with-openssl-exception
[00:03:43] <legoktm>	 and then you can have compound statements so AND / OR (e.g. Scribunto)
[00:05:48] <Reedy>	 We need to do further processing before shoving it in extension.schema.json?
[00:06:20] <Reedy>	 alphasorting I guess
[00:06:46] <legoktm>	 that's about it
[00:11:59] <Reedy>	 legoktm: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/416193/2/docs/extension.schema.json
[00:12:34] <Reedy>	 We don't want to include isOsiApproved == false?
[00:16:11] <legoktm>	 I think we need to
[00:16:17] <legoktm>	 e.g. CC zero is not OSI approved
[00:16:52] <legoktm>	 also technically GPL v2 is not OSI approved, only v3 is
[00:17:16] <legoktm>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T152581#2859128 has the fun list
[00:18:05] <Reedy>	 I guess just sorting in the same order would help
[00:18:09] <Reedy>	 to save extra diff noise :P
[00:20:20] <legoktm>	 I don't think it matters much, like I said the old list was bad :p
[00:20:39] <Reedy>	 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/416193/3/docs/extension.schema.json
[00:20:48] <Reedy>	 RELEASE-NOTES and ship it? ;)
[00:24:14] <bd808>	 GPLv2 is not OSI approved?
[00:24:26] <bd808>	 or do you mean it is superceeded?
[00:27:06] <Reedy>	 https://github.com/composer/spdx-licenses/blob/1.3.0/res/spdx-exceptions.json
[00:29:17] <legoktm>	 bd808: superceeded yeah. well, what you wrote on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T152581#2859210 :)
[00:32:13] <Reedy>	 1.28 isn't supported now is it?
[00:33:03] <Reedy>	 yup, EOL
[00:34:49] <legoktm>	 Reedy: uh wrong section for 1.30
[00:35:20] <Reedy>	 heh
[01:06:36] <no_justification>	 legoktm: When you restored the REL* branches for vendor, did you go behind and drop stuff we don't need?
[01:06:45] <legoktm>	 no
[01:06:54] <legoktm>	 I'm not sure how breaking that would be
[01:14:36] <Reedy>	 There's only Wikipedia isn't there...
[01:14:44] <Reedy>	 Implement something they've wanted for years
[01:14:49] <Reedy>	 Do it, and then they don't want it
[01:15:16] <no_justification>	 I love the insinuation that devs should *only* work on things enwiki explicitly asks for