[12:20:09] Skizzerz: I'm amused at how many people at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#A_different_suggestion_for_implementation seem to think you either work for WMF or did any work on Monobook. [15:36:02] I'm just being amazed how they don't seem to grasp that we're volunteers same as they are. [16:47:57] Isarra: Welcome to the club :P [16:48:16] of .. they will yell at us no matter what we do or who did it. [16:48:22] The fact that I do work for WMF makes no difference. [19:13:35] for the discussion a day or two ago: innodb in older versions of mysql had godawful crash recovery for certain scenarios [19:13:49] now that innodb_file_per_table is defaulted to on, it's a lot better [19:14:25] (I remember spending a good couple of days trying to recover data from a corrupted mw instance after the server died in the middle of a write on innodb, it wasn't fun) [19:14:46] nowadays, I see no reason to use myisam over innodb [19:14:52] the ACID compliance alone makes it worthwhile [19:25:14] lol [19:25:22] Wiki is public, can't share link... [20:27:28] Krinkle: Good point. The policies etc should apply no matter what people are. O_o [20:27:53] ...should I just start throwing acronyms at people and go request dispute resolution or something? [21:29:58] legoktm: Do you want deprecation for https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196185 to go out in 1.31? Or 1.32? [21:30:14] We could still backport if you want, otherwise we can tag it for mw-1.32 to remember for later [21:31:40] Krinkle: I'd like to remove it in 1.32, policy wise since it was clearly marked as experimental, we don't have to deprecate it first, but since we still have some time to do so it would be best to backport a deprecation to 1.31 [21:32:27] legoktm: cool.