[10:55:26] tgr, addshore: if you have time, please review https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/441045 [10:55:42] anomie: if you have time, please have another look at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/429421 [11:10:46] tgr: do you think you will be working on T194731 this week? Otherwise, I could take that on. It's the last thin in the backlog... [11:10:47] T194731: Show diffs for all slots [MCR] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T194731 [11:42:39] DanielK_WMDE: yeah, will do that tomorrow [11:42:49] the diff patch, I mean [17:20:33] DanielK_WMDE, anomie: Should T174030 be marked as Resolved? All its children tasks are Resolved, as is T196172… [17:20:34] T174030: Implement DB schema migration tools for MCR - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T174030 [17:20:34] T196172: Test schema migration script - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196172 [17:30:07] James_F: yes, thank you! [17:30:44] DanielK_WMDE: So T183488 is now ready to go? [17:30:44] T183488: MCR schema migration stage 2: populate new fields - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T183488 [17:32:05] James_F: no - before we can populate the new tables on the live systems, we need to start writing the new fields on the live systems. The code for this is merged, but not yet enabled. Doing that (after some more testing) is the next step. [17:34:15] OK. Should there be a task for that? [17:37:57] James_F: i just made three :) [17:38:20] James_F: first beta, then testwiki, then live. [17:38:32] * James_F nods. [17:38:33] then run the script on these three, in that order. [17:38:36] Thanks! [17:38:45] Thank you for following up! [17:55:30] DanielK_WMDE: should we have an MCR section for SoS? [17:55:44] a bit unclear now who should report on it [17:56:11] or just clarify which team does it [17:57:04] DanielK_WMDE: FYI, T161647#4303621 appears to be the same thing mentioned in T161647#3852558 [17:57:04] T161647: RFC: Deprecate using php serialization inside MediaWiki - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T161647 [18:04:49] as an interested person: yes to MCR section in SoS :) [18:04:52] anomie: probably, thanks! [18:05:53] tgr: good idea. not sure. the platform team could, but who attends for the platform team? [18:06:11] no one this time [18:06:20] hm, right [18:06:21] Cindy usually, I think [18:06:47] so she could report for MCR, too. She manages the board, afterall. [18:07:07] and we all could make sure relevant stuff goes on the etherpad beforehand