[13:59:47] anomie: to you think the Article overhaul and its parent can go in today? I think we sorted out the remaining details yesterday. [13:59:58] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/452708/24 [14:54:00] legoktm: CindyCicaleseWMF : https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T203095 [14:55:10] I saw - THANK YOU! I really appreciate your work on this with the very tight deadline and much concurrent effort! I will follow up on your requests with Legal. [14:55:49] bawolff: ^ [15:03:46] CindyCicaleseWMF i wonder if a "step by step on how to contact your eu representative" should be added. Since im sure many users won't know how to contact there's like me. [15:06:00] paladox: the site will walk the user through emailing, tweeting to, and phoning their member of the EU parliament. [15:06:15] ah ok thanks :) [15:12:26] Reedy: " I wonder if we can make CI more smart about merging vendor patches" yes please [15:12:55] we should improve mediawiki-vendor in general [15:12:56] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T179663 [15:13:19] * addshore goes back to frying fish [15:33:31] addshore: Jan had a nice RfC for this :/ [15:33:45] JanZ? [15:34:39] it's only a matter of time until it violently explodes in someones face, probably will show up on group0 though.... [15:36:11] Yep! [15:37:01] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Streamlining_Composer_usage bit outdated now [15:38:13] I really appreciated how that has all the threats explicity listed [17:15:46] DanielK_WMDE_: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T203583 :-( [17:20:14] James_F: looking. I have about 40 minutes before i have to head out, to make it home in time for techcom. [17:20:49] DanielK_WMDE_: It may be that the answer is "tough, that was always unreliable and now it won't ever work, sorry". [17:21:28] James_F: i put a lot of time and thought into making this work, so it really should :) [17:21:36] also, anomie will kill me if it doesn't [17:21:45] Ha. [17:31:17] DanielK_WMDE_: It looks like during the pre-save transform your changes to Parser::getRevisionObject() are making it use the saved revision where previously it returned null because $this->mRevisionId was unset. [17:32:39] I guess your current revision callback isn't set up yet when PST is happening. [17:34:38] anomie: that's probably it. writing a test to reproduce the issue now. [17:53:28] anomie: the current revision callback was actually never set up on the ParserOptions used for PST. [18:03:21] DanielK_WMDE_: Timecheck that you have to leave to make the meeting. [18:05:21] James_F: thank you James :) [18:05:32] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/458251