[06:31:17] ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/publish/master/squashed (no common ancestry) [06:31:42] that's right, we made an initial commit... [15:23:34] anomie: thoughts on risk of rolling forward to group1 given https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T207288 ? [15:23:39] cc twentyafterfour [15:25:41] greg-g, twentyafterfour: Our choices are to either go forward or block the train forever waiting for someone to magically figure out how to reproduce it, IMO. [15:26:24] If it does reoccur, it'd be helpful to debug it as it's happening since reproducing after the fact wasn't successful before. [15:26:46] anomie: ok thanks! [15:33:50] ack [15:54:22] now seeing: [15:54:24] Argument 2 passed to Wikibase\Lib\Store\Sql\WikiPageEntityMetaDataLookup::__construct() must implement interface Wikibase\Lib\Store\Sql\PageTableEntityQuery, MediaWiki\Storage\NameTableStore given in /srv/mediawiki/php-1.32.0-wmf.26/extensions/WikibaseQualityConstraints/src/ServiceWiring.php on line 254 [15:54:29] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T207394 [19:30:59] anomie: Seen http://tools.wmflabs.org/heritage/api/api.php ? [19:31:09] 2010 called, it wants its API doc pages back [19:33:23] I think that's even more horrible than the actual old API docs. [19:34:38] lol [19:39:06] I love it [20:08:53] addshore: Did you want to do further testing on https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/464029 , or are you happy for it to be merged? [20:23:24] RoanKattouw: I'm totally happy for someone else to merge it :) [20:23:37] I have not had time to look at it unfortunately :( [20:24:41] OK, then I will merge it now [20:25:14] Woo! [21:09:53] Reedy, I think the MW API action=help pages were like that up until late 2014? [21:10:10] Sure [21:11:35] I remember anomie proposing a bunch of API improvements at wikimania that year and I think that was one of them [21:15:27] TimStarling, https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/ParsoidBatchAPI/+/468335 should hopefully be an easy review [21:43:36] Any thoughts on breaking b/c in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/avro-php/+/466838/ ? [21:48:34] Who actually uses it? [21:49:59] Us! [22:03:02] +1 from me as long as it still works and the data from search and the action api get to hadoop [22:03:31] that patch is definitely commit us to forking :) [22:08:11] We already committed to it when we had to make it work with PHP 7.0