[00:05:51] <Reedy>	 musikanimal: Be awesome to get that documented on mediawiki.org somewhere.... :D
[00:07:18] <musikanimal>	 haha yes! Good idea. I wanted to add it to w:WP:SIG but I figured someone would revert me. They don't like fun facts
[02:26:04] <legoktm>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design_decisions_made_by_Magnus_Manske
[15:55:31] <Nemo_bis>	 legoktm, musikanimal, Reedy, added to https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Manual%3AMediaWiki_architecture&type=revision&diff=3047740&oldid=2988861 for now :)
[18:05:58] <tgr>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers and Phab have no component for the MediaWiki storage layer
[18:06:12] <tgr>	 would it make sense to add one?
[18:07:41] <tgr>	 there's ContentHandler, database and page editing, but I wouldn't associate any of those with the XxxStore classes
[18:08:08] * tgr is wondering how to tag T213478 better
[21:09:20] <anomie>	 tgr: T206284?
[21:09:21] <stashbot>	 T206284: Create MediaWiki tag(s) for page data (access, storage, updates) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206284
[21:24:43] <anomie>	 subbu: FYI, https://doc.wikimedia.org/Parsoid-PHP/master/ and https://doc.wikimedia.org/cover/mediawiki-services-parsoid/ !
[21:24:44] <anomie>	 (thanks legoktm)
[21:24:57] <legoktm>	 np :-)
[21:25:57] <legoktm>	 anomie: we're also discussing stuff in #mediawiki-parsoid
[21:26:16] <anomie>	 I should probably join that channel, at least for the quarter
[21:26:18] <subbu>	 ya .. code coverage on the js side is 85% .. but we need to exclude missing coverage for test, tracing, and debug fucntionality .. and it will go over 90% on the JS side .. so, I expect we should get 90%+ on the php side as code gets ported.
[23:45:51] <paladox>	 Reedy thank you!
[23:46:44] <Reedy>	 Slightly annoying this apparently didn't appear in testing before... But that's software development for you
[23:48:02] <paladox>	 heh yeh, i didn't catch it on our test servers until we deployed it to prod.
[23:48:46] <Reedy>	 c'est la vie
[23:49:02] <Reedy>	 Depending on how spammy it ends up being more widely, it might be worth a point release in a few weeks to clear a few of these issues up
[23:49:42] <paladox>	 yup
[23:50:04] <paladox>	 it's very spammy
[23:53:45] <Reedy>	 paladox: Will you be following the REL1_32 branch on git to bring in the fixes, incase there's any more similar stuff that should be fixed up too?
[23:54:31] <paladox>	 i think so
[23:54:53] <paladox>	 anything that shows up in the logs, i will search (in mw core (master)) :)