[00:21:48] <legoktm>	 James_F: have I ever shown you https://git.legoktm.com/legoktm/bin/src/master/add_codesniffer.py ?
[00:28:35] <James_F>	 legoktm: No! That's rather neat.
[00:32:34] <James_F>	 legoktm: Ideally it'd init the repo with the git commit hook so it sets change IDs, but I'm just fussing now. ;-)
[00:36:08] <James_F>	 legoktm: So my local command is `git remote rm origin; git remote add origin ssh://jforrester@gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/mediawiki/extensions/(basename "$PWD"); git fetch; git master; nuke; set gitdir (git rev-parse --git-dir); scp -p -P 29418 jforrester@gerrit.wikimedia.org:hooks/commit-msg "$gitdir"/hooks/; ../../add_codesniffer.py` which definitely isn't insane. ;-)
[00:36:36] <legoktm>	 wow
[00:36:39] <legoktm>	 what does nuke do?
[00:37:14] <James_F>	 Oh, yeah, that's `alias nuke "git clear; and git remote update; and git checkout master; and git pull"`
[00:37:47] <legoktm>	 also instead of scp'ing to get the hook, you can just keep a copy of it lying around and copy it in as needed
[00:37:49] <legoktm>	 https://git.legoktm.com/legoktm/grr/src/master/grr/__init__.py#L181
[00:38:32] * James_F nods.
[00:45:01] <James_F>	 legoktm: Also, is there a plan to get rid of wikibase-codesniffer?
[00:50:16] <legoktm>	  not really
[00:50:27] <legoktm>	 I have some ideas but haven't discussed them or written them down anywhere
[00:50:57] <James_F>	 Kk.
[15:25:38] <davidwbarratt>	 since the revision slots re in the database, it is possible for someone to change `main` to something else right?
[15:25:49] <davidwbarratt>	 *are
[18:24:42] <Krinkle>	 davidwbarratt: do you mean whether 'main' will always be wikitext?
[18:25:11] <davidwbarratt>	 Krinkle no I mean what happens if someone renames "main" to something else?
[18:25:53] <Krinkle>	 I don't know offhand whether 'main' is mandatory to exist. But, I do know that slotnames must be registered programmatically, so the someone = developer, but not a user.
[18:26:33] <Krinkle>	 I also don't know whether an existing blob of content can be re-purposed for another slot, e.g. "moving" it.
[18:26:54] <Krinkle>	 although I imagine it can't be, I mean, logically anyway. In essense, there is no history though. Each revision and content blob is on its own.
[18:27:23] <davidwbarratt>	 intereting
[18:27:27] <davidwbarratt>	 Krinkle thanks!
[18:27:46] <Krinkle>	 So one could, if a UI were made, make an edit whereby a slot is added containing the content previously in "main", and put something else in "main" or remove it (if and only  if "main" is optional, which I'm not sure of).
[18:28:03] <Krinkle>	 The move would likely not be recognised though, just copy/paste, "happens" to be similar.
[20:02:50] <James_F>	 Krinkle: Yeah, slot order replacement isn't currently planned behaviour.