[00:00:11] (because all preferences are saved for all options) [00:00:13] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgDefaultUserOptions [00:00:19] ok I look Splarka , thanks [00:01:02] you might have to physically disable skins or something to force it for older users [00:10:40] 03(mod) Compare selected versions should be a link, not a button ( JavaScript) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16165 (10siebrand) [00:11:17] Mike_lifeguard: I tested the patch. Added a screenshot and comments to the bug. [00:12:09] yes... I didn't know htmldiff existed until earlier today :) [00:12:16] hehe [00:12:36] (zzz...) [00:16:02] wow, htmldiff is cool ^_^ [00:16:36] String substitution is never recursive, right? [00:16:50] (in PHP that is) [00:17:14] *davidmccabe is about to use create_function() for the first time. [00:18:16] str_replace()? no, it does a single pass [00:18:28] beware of create_function(), though, it's the devil's work ;) [00:19:42] hi brion. [00:20:17] brion_: Does anybody actually use $wgEnotifImpersonal? [00:20:32] brion_: I am greatly refactoring UserMailer. [00:20:40] Splarka , $wgDefaultUserOptions['skin'] = false; <=== ? [00:20:58] i'll kill any code containing eval() or create_function() on principle :) [00:21:13] (function() {...}) ftw! [00:21:15] brion_: There's some code that's outputting annoyingly many wfDebugs. Do I need to keep those? [00:21:22] $wgDefaultSkin = 'StellarBook'; [00:22:04] brion_: in particular: http://pastie.textmate.org/private/ejbempogmzswffknxyej6a [00:22:07] if they provide useful informtaion they shoul dbe kept [00:22:37] ok [00:24:54] Escobar: there's a maintence script to change user preferences for existing accounts as well [00:25:53] whos the script ? [00:26:05] sorry my english is verry bad [00:26:24] I think there is... [00:27:31] brion_: http://pastie.textmate.org/309945 but that's so cute, how could you oppose it? [00:28:47] oh christ, the evil :D [00:28:53] Escobar: userOptions.php [00:29:00] i love lambdas, but i hate eval()s [00:29:06] too much danger of kaboom :D [00:29:13] brion_: it is a lambda, just a really broken one. [00:29:17] hehehe [00:29:24] brion_: There's no danger if the values going in are static, not user-supplied. [00:29:38] it also memory-leaks; created functions aren't garbage collected until the php script ends ;) [00:30:12] ok MrZ-man I look [00:33:06] brion_: (intended usage, although it's not big enough of a win to get in an argument over.) http://pastie.textmate.org/private/26aw34klaisyx14cnziyq [00:34:36] eww? :) [00:34:45] putting code in strings is always nasty [00:34:53] yeah, not that big of a win. [00:34:54] fucking php. [00:35:05] :D [00:35:08] anyone here using fckeditor? [00:35:23] i've uncommented the paragraph alignment and text color [00:35:27] but i still don't get em [00:36:06] brion_: we can at least agree that this is obnoxious and some sugar should be found? http://pastie.textmate.org/private/9i3wt7tboxykt9tlujmkg [00:36:41] hmmm, actually that's a good case for horizontal scrolling. [00:39:47] *brion_ looks [00:40:36] not sure a prettier way to do that, honestly [00:40:48] i think originally it was just a big pile of ||d clauses [00:40:58] which sucked when you didn't get any mail cause it wans't clear what the fuck was happening [00:41:07] the debug messages clarify what the hell happened [00:41:08] right, I can see that. [00:41:51] looks like we're headin out [00:41:52] catch ya later [00:48:35] davidmccabe: http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/9500/evailyv5.jpg [00:52:18] 03(mod) Compare selected versions should be a link, not a button ( JavaScript) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16165 +comment (10matthew.flaschen) [00:56:15] 03(mod) Compare selected versions should be a link, not a button ( JavaScript) - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16165 (10matthew.flaschen) [00:57:12] Splarka: wow, did you just make that? [00:57:34] I've never had a 'shop just for me. [01:03:42] *Splarka hides [01:09:05] 03dale * r43287 10/trunk/extensions/MetavidWiki/ (18 files in 9 dirs): more code for archive.org external repository support [01:23:36] Does anyone know of a wiki where I can test the flagged revisions extension? [01:24:21] http://en.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page [01:25:34] ah, forgot about that one [01:26:19] hmmm. [01:26:37] by "test", I mean do all the sighting and stuff, does that need a special user permission? [01:26:52] 03(NEW) s:cs: settings - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16277 15enhancement; normal; Wikimedia: Site requests; (danny.b) [01:27:58] oh I see, it lets you set them yourself. odd system but I guess it works [01:33:34] gurch: obviously in the deployed versions you can't set them yourself [01:34:23] yes I get that [01:36:06] dear me this is all a bit fiddly [01:36:31] and there's about a million different ways to configure it [01:36:50] yeah, how different is de.wikipedia's setup from the demonstration one? [01:37:27] even with the interface language set to english it's a little hard to grok how it works there [01:41:04] gurch: you should see it with deletedrevs [01:41:17] the UI looks like godmode_heavy (ick) [01:42:28] well fortunately I don't have to implement that [01:47:53] how do I make it so only registered users can edit/create pages [01:49:32] hmm, seems there's a "detailed" interface as well. so the one I was using was the simple one! :/ [01:51:17] !access | DrJ [01:51:17] --mwbot-- DrJ: For information on customizing user access, see . For common examples of restricting access using both rights and extensions, see . [01:51:34] been there, read that [01:51:36] tried that [01:51:38] didn't work [01:52:03] I added $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] = false; [01:52:08] to AdminSettings.php [01:52:19] did not work [01:54:07] you don't have a LocalSettings.php ? [01:54:25] hmm, I thought it should go in AdminSettings [01:54:40] *DrJ is very new to this (only have a few hours with it thus far) [01:55:47] hmm [01:55:49] that worked [01:55:52] but one question [01:55:59] can I make it so the edit button still appears? [01:56:09] that way they can click on it and be told they need to register to edit [01:56:20] it should be there as [view source] [01:56:33] which you could just reword in the language config, see Special:Allmessages [01:56:48] hmm [01:56:56] why is it denying them from viewing the source [01:57:14] what version are you using? [01:57:44] I installed it with plesk [01:57:48] so ... not really sure [01:57:52] any quick way of finding out? [01:58:19] thanks Splarka my skin is good for default :) http://www.bullteam.net/mediawiki/index.php/Accueil [01:58:21] Special:Version [01:58:31] 03aaron * r43288 10/trunk/phase3/includes/filerepo/LocalFile.php: Make sure the top rev is not hidden [01:58:44] 03(NEW) FlaggedRevisions extension: API "sighting" of revisions - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 15enhancement; normal; MediaWiki: API; (matthew.britton) [01:58:44] rar [01:59:19] 1.11.0 [02:00:54] mmm, I think at the time in that situation you couldn't view source, sort of a bug [02:01:09] if you protect the page then viewing the source becomes possible again, IIRC [02:01:27] they could also use action=raw I suppose [02:01:51] since 1.13 I think, */read = false, lets people view source: http://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Staff&action=edit [02:02:25] hmm, yea [02:02:30] I'll probably upgrade [02:02:32] Escobar: looks a lot like monobook, heh [02:04:33] yes just a color changes, for my users is perfectlly, begginners linux [02:07:54] if you are the skin on upload, i'm interresing [02:09:22] I little to give my official site ? [02:21:27] 03aaron * r43289 10/trunk/phase3/includes/Linker.php: Code space tweaks [02:29:55] AaronSchulz: go to bed! [02:31:58] it's not even late [02:33:38] anyone here good with php? (the people in ##php aren't very helpful) [02:36:24] What's the best way to add two special pages in an extension? [02:37:02] <^demon> chuck: Write SpecialWhatever classes that extend SpecialPage. [02:37:32] <^demon> Then add them to $wgSpecialPages :) [02:37:57] ^demon, File naming schemes though? [02:47:17] 03(mod) rcid cannot be easily retrieved - implementation seems patchy - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12394 +comment (10matthew.britton) [02:48:02] <^demon> chuck: Check out my InterwikiList extension in svn, it's a really simple example with one specialpage, nothing fancy. [02:50:28] 03aaron * r43290 10/trunk/extensions/FlaggedRevs/FlaggedArticle.php: Don't bother showing notice for deleted revs [02:52:40] ^demon, I'm talking about what I should call the file names if I have more than one special page [02:53:24] <^demon> SpecialWhatever, SpecialSomethingElse, etc? [02:55:42] is there any good editing applications you can run on your computer to edit mediawiki pages [03:24:35] 03(mod) Enable Special:Nuke on en.wiki - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15783 +comment (10rjd0060.wiki) [03:24:47] hi [03:24:54] can i change the layout of AllPAge? [03:37:43] Hi gang, just a quick question: How do I (un)suppress error messages in mediawiki? [03:38:29] I've downloaded a mediawiki install for local & need to make some edits. Currently, a lot of errors bring up a blank white screen, where I could probably use some error msgs. :-) [03:41:46] thebaggage, There's a page about debugging on mediawiki.org, one mo [03:42:23] thebaggage, http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_debug [03:42:42] Many thanks chuck - much appreciated. :-) [03:42:48] yw [03:43:35] *chuck <3 MediaWiki Profiler [03:43:44] so useful for figuring out why pages take 30 seconds to load [04:16:54] i'm trying to find smthing to convert 1436.1 minutes into 23:59:00. i try {{ #time: G:i:s | 0.00 +1436.1 min }}, but it returns odd results [04:18:05] ...like 9:25:00 [04:19:16] if i do it like 0:00 +0 +1436.1 min, i get 0:01:00 [04:26:21] harpette: seems to have probs with decimals? [04:26:51] ah, indeed, i haven't tried w/out the .1 suffix [04:27:08] silly me [04:27:30] {{#expr:{{{1]}}} round 0}} [04:27:44] oops, typo, but also a fallback is good: {{#expr:{{{1|0}}} round 0}} [04:27:57] then it should be happy [04:28:52] you mean i run the 1436.1 through your code 1st? [04:29:53] right, if it is a user-input parameter [04:30:40] but then it returns 23:56:00, which is not accurate [04:31:35] 1436.1 minutes into 23:59:00 [04:31:36] neither is that [04:32:06] how much do you get? [04:32:15] well, lets math it out [04:32:27] 86166 seconds [04:32:40] oh wait, perhaps that 56 is accurate indeed, i'm confused [04:32:55] 23:56:06 [04:33:03] {{#time: G:i:s | 0.00 +86166 sec}} [04:33:09] in fact, maybe you should do that [04:33:24] +{{#expr:{{{1|0}}} * 60 round 0}} secs [04:34:13] hmm [04:35:02] yah, that works [04:35:07] {{#time: G:i:s | 0.00 +{{#expr:({{{1|1436.1}}} * 60) round 0}} secs}} [04:35:30] Hi gang. Just wondering, is it possible to upgrade MediaWiki 1.9 --> 1.13 without command line access? (cPanel, FTP only) [04:35:51] Splarka: yes, of course. Thank you much. [04:36:35] enjoy [04:36:46] will do [04:48:26] 03river * r43291 10/trunk/tools/ts-specs/ (TSmbuffer.spec patches/mbuffer-01-destdir.diff): TSmbuffer: new spec [04:52:27] Splarka: eventual solution: http://pastie.textmate.org/private/yfbndbty4yop76lngrrnq [04:59:56] hmm [05:00:27] lemme venn diagram for ya [05:01:02] davidmccabe: http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/9282/vennsy7.jpg [05:01:25] 03(NEW) Hidden categories should appear below textarea when previewing - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16279 15enhancement; normal; MediaWiki: General/Unknown; (public) [05:01:59] That bug is strange. I probably should've elaborated on it more... [05:02:02] Splarka: ah, I didn't realize that. [05:05:25] davidmccabe: I resist most urges in that vein, listening to all the devs whine about it constantly [05:05:36] fucking php. [05:05:46] which is the most common^ [05:05:56] <_mary_kate_> hmm, it's like archeology: https://wikitech.leuksman.com/view/Server_admin_log/Archive_1 [05:06:20] MZMcBride: you should have made the bug summary " Hidden categories should appear below textarea when previewing (n/t)" [05:06:47] <_mary_kate_> log entries from jwales ;) [05:07:19] Splarka: Wut? [05:07:23] Splarka: Well just so you know, this particular PHP doesn't spawn a host of diabolical fiends. [05:08:31] MZM: nt for no-text, when the whole point of the post/email/whatever is in the topic [05:08:44] Oh. [05:08:51] Splarka: I'm happy for you that you stay away from these things. Sorcery endangers the soul of the practitioner. [05:08:53] Yes, well... bug summaries change. [05:08:53] mmm, fiend_fork() [05:09:07] davidmccabe: well, think about JS for a second [05:09:29] instead of having to support a few hundred types of versions and servers... [05:09:44] Splarka: when I do that, I get the urge to kill, is that normal? [05:09:45] you have to support a billion individual browsers, configurations, operating systems, and users [05:09:57] client side execution for the pain [05:10:00] It was an elf once. Then the Dark One twisted it to his evil designs... [05:10:25] Splarka: MW should use a toolkit instead of making our own sucky mini toolkit. [05:10:52] Agh... [05:11:13] :/ That common misconception is fairly annoying [05:11:18] luckily js is usually an enhancement [05:11:38] Dantman: That we don't use a toolkit? ;) [05:11:41] A) It's not JavaScript that's the issue... it's browser side scripting, which may be either JScript or mozilla's JavaScript [05:11:43] so if it breaks in 1% of browsers to have collapsing content, they won't lose info, just have more to scroll [05:11:55] Both are dialects of ECMAScript [05:12:02] B) It's not [05:12:05] bleh [05:12:06] Dantman: Pedantics. Bah. [05:12:55] B) It's not the scripting language that causes people issues... For the most part both JScript and JavaScript 1.5 behave the same... The issue is the wide variety of implementation of the DOM [05:13:02] DOM is not JavaScript [05:13:36] Dantman: wanna help me refactor UserMailer? [05:13:52] davidmccabe: Sorry, I'm playing around with jslibs at the moment [05:14:19] ^_^ I think I'm going to try and implement the fastcgi protocol in JavaScript using jslibs and SpiderMonkey [05:15:06] My current project is helping turn JavaScript into the next booming web programming language. [05:15:19] SpiderMonkey is alright alone, but lacks libraries [05:15:45] ^_^ So I'm trying to help out on one of the projects that is building libraries to use with SpiderMonkey [05:16:05] ;) Or rather, the library is actually using TraceMonkey if you understand what I'm talking about, heh... [05:28:03] hey davidmccabe [05:28:13] davidmccabe: How's lqt coming? :) [05:40:44] werdnus: coming slow, making it shiny. [05:54:07] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/06/AR2008110603948_pf.html [06:02:30] if I don't have shell access on my hosting platform, are there any other ways to run maintenance/update.php ? [06:03:07] !shell | mboman [06:03:07] --mwbot-- mboman: Shell access (that is, SSH access, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSH) is highly recommended if you want to run MediaWiki. You can install without it, and basic operation will work, but even creating backups or upgrading will be painful without it. Some more involved maintenance tasks may even be impossible. MediaWiki is not designed for minimal environments. [06:03:16] !phpshell | mboman [06:03:16] --mwbot-- mboman: PHP Shell emulates shell access to a system. Read more about it and download it at < http:mgeisler.net/php-shell/ > [06:51:48] is the "did you mean: blah" feature of wikipedia a new feature of mediawiki, or an extension? [06:57:26] naught102: it's in an extension, because Wikimedia updated to Lucene 2.1 [06:57:39] I think it might exist in the default search setup. [06:57:50] werdnus: ok, thanks [06:58:45] any of you know how to setup MW to work with FastCGI? [07:13:39] vsrinivas: google is your friend. [07:13:59] Wow... that's the second coincidental topic today [07:15:03] get jslibs to work and start fooling around with cli driven js scripts... pop over here... and there is a big JavaScript topic going on [07:15:37] vsrinivas: You shouldn't need to do anything special. [07:15:46] Then, I start working on an implementation of FastCGI in JavaScript... I pop over here... and someone has a FastCGI question [07:15:46] Just set up PHP with fastcgi and MW will work fine. [07:15:57] FastCGI in JAVASCRIPT? [07:16:04] excuse me while I throw up :P [07:16:07] You might have short url issues [07:16:14] werdnus: Why's that? [07:16:27] Dantman: I hope you mean a fastcgi HANDLER for javascript. [07:16:42] I suppose... I think? [07:16:43] rather than an implementation of fastcgi in javascript. [07:17:04] You want to be able to go to http://my.site/some/file.js and have it executed server-side? [07:17:33] Well, I suppose I'd go for something more like .sjs, but something like that [07:17:43] yeah, .js would conflict. [07:18:08] I'm basically writing a bit for jslibs so that it can use FastCGI [07:19:20] Though, I'm of the party that would like to go to http://my.site/foobar and have some core .js script run and given the path info [07:19:50] I prefer web apps that handle their own paths, over a collection of scripts [07:20:21] s/, over/, rather than/ [07:20:55] *werdnus is on the opposite side. [07:21:14] well, I prefer collections of scripts to one monolith [07:21:24] but OTOH, I like the idea of a web app handling its own paths [07:21:42] Never said it would absolutely be one script [07:21:53] Just something that has a single entry point to start up [07:22:14] Similar to MediaWiki's /index.php which everything goes through [07:22:49] Cept, I prefer cleaner implementations than what PHP/apache allows [07:23:14] Mod rewrite and Aliases is yucky [07:24:01] ^_^ I like to treat MediaWiki as a whole web app, and setup fastcgi with nginx so that it runs /index.php like the entry point to a web app [07:24:26] ie: Any /wiki/ /edit/ or such request [07:24:48] I just need to figure out what the first 16 bytes of a request are [07:38:43] hello, how can I use a template and prevent it from adding the page it's being used in to a certain category? [07:38:58] did not do the job [07:45:18] How did you format that? [07:45:36] Putting the category tag inside of a noinclude is the correct way to do it [07:46:14] Dantman: What I'm doing is a templates catalogue, so when I use a say Stub template, the page get's added to the "Stub" categorie [07:46:24] I want to avoid that unwanted categorization [07:47:45] You don't want the page put in [[Category:Stub]] when you put {{Stub}} in the page? [07:47:55] 14(WFM) API needs an easier way to get section numbers - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16276 +comment (10roan.kattouw) [07:48:03] Dantman: right [07:48:53] My question here is, if you are using a {{Stub}} template, what purpose do you even have for putting the [[Category:Stub]] in the {{Stub}} template at all? [07:48:55] 03(mod) Provide preference-based autoformatting for unlinked dates - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582 (10cyp) [07:49:11] Dantman: http://es.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Usuario:TC-Rucho/CatálogoPlantillas [07:49:53] Dantman: Adding [[Category:Stub]] to the {{Stub}} template adds every page containing the stub box to the stub category which is really handy [07:51:18] Ok, this is probably a language barrier mixing up the conversation so one can't understand completely what the other is talking about [07:52:27] From what you've said I've read it as literal English and it appeared like "I want to put {{Stub}} in an article, but I don't what that article to be put in the Stub category, while I have [[Category:Stub]] inside the Stub template." [07:52:35] actually, I think you don't understand Spanish, but that's not a problem at all. I just don't want the [[Category:Stub]] in the [[Template:Stub]] to be applied to the page when using the {{Stub}} template since this is a catalogue. [07:52:55] yes, that's right [07:53:38] When users nominate an article as stub adding {{Stub}} it get's automatically included in the [[Category:Stub]] since it's _in_ the [[Template:Stub]] [07:54:40] I find it pretty convenient, but since this page is not a stub, but a templates catalogue, I need to avoid it from apearing in any template inherited category [07:54:53] ^_^ How about this... replace your [[Category:Stub]] with [[Category:Stub]] and if it turns out the way you want, then this would be categorized as a miscommunication caused by english grammar [07:55:23] ((or the fact that it's 11:55PM at night, heh...)) [07:55:23] Dantman: Actually, I've already tried but did not work [07:55:31] Oh... hmm [07:55:42] Dantman: don't worry about that 5:54 am here [07:55:51] ^_^ How about we drop out of English, and use lists... [07:55:58] 2:55 AM here... [07:56:01] you're not the only one that hasn't got enough rest [07:56:14] Dantman: uh? [07:56:54] Rather than entire English sentences, breaking this down into a case-by-case list of what is wanted vs. what is happening [07:57:13] ok, I'll give that a try [07:57:18] 1) You have a {{Stub}} template [07:57:50] 2) You want articles that users put {{Stub}} inside of to be put inside [[Category:Stub]]. (Correct?) [07:58:28] let me do the list :) [07:58:30] 1. I'm building a templates catalogue where {{TemplateX}} is in one column showing what it produces, and

{{TemplateX}}

in the other column showing the code that generates the previous cell countent [07:58:31] Ok [07:59:09] Ohwait... [07:59:34] 2. I already have [[Category:TemplateX]] inside the {{TemplateX}}'s guts [07:59:35] You have "Articles", "Template:Stub", and "A template Catalogue" [07:59:48] yes [07:59:51] kind of [08:00:32] So you want [[Category:Stub]] inside of "Articles", I don't know what you want for Template:Stub, but you don't want [[Category:Stub]] inside the template catalogue [08:00:43] 3. When users use the {{ArticleX}} template, the article is automatically included in the [[Category:TemplateX]] (which is good) [08:01:03] Dantman: seems you got the idea :) [08:01:25] Dantman: but it's still incorrect, let me finish the list [08:01:38] ^_^ the combination of things focused me on just Articles vs. Template:Stub [08:02:47] 4. This article is a templates catalogue, so using {{TemplateX}} is so that users get a nice idea of what it does, but it's not meant in any way to add the _catalogue_ to the [[Categorie:TemplateX]] [08:03:03] the game [08:03:15] I think it's clearer now, isn't it Dantman? [08:03:27] ^_^ That's basically what I just said [08:03:36] Ok [08:03:49] So this template cataloge, is it in any special namespace? [08:04:14] 5. So, what I need is to avoid the [[Category:TemplateX]] inside {{TemplateX}} from being applied to the current article (catalogue) [08:04:34] Dantman: what do you mean? [08:05:02] Sometimes people put the template catalogues inside a namespace like Template: or Project: [08:05:23] Dantman: sure, it's http://es.gentoo-wiki.com/w/index.php?title=Plantilla:Fragmento [08:05:32] it's in the Plantilla: namespace [08:05:49] well, no, sorry, misunderstood the question [08:06:05] Really, the topic here is on what conditions do we want to exclude the category [08:06:18] the catalogue it's not in any namespace right now, it's under my User page [08:06:34] Dantman: yes [08:06:58] excludes the template itself, using parserfunctions we can also exclude entire namespaces, or exclude specific pages [08:07:14] Or we can use a parameter to prevent categories [08:07:25] I thought there were some tag to avoid the category thing [08:07:53] No, all that kind of stuff is done with sticking something inside something like a parser function [08:08:16] Avoiding categories with some sort of tag doesn't really fit in with the parser [08:08:35] Well, now that you mention it, ading a parameter to the template would be good enough so that when called with |catalogue=yes the category part is discarded [08:09:04] Well, normally I see people use something like |nocats=true}} ^_^ [08:09:16] *tc-rucho checks that out [08:10:16] But all you do in that kind of case is {{#if:{{{nocats|}}}| |[[Category:Stub]]}} [08:12:31] ok, that did the trick :D [08:12:59] Dantman: thanks a ton for the help, and sorry for making you troubles with some broken statement I wrote that lead to confusion [08:13:20] I haven't slept sh*t so I'm wording things the wrong way sometimes [08:13:22] Whohoo... yay for overly long conversations about simple techniques [08:13:45] ironic [08:13:55] =/ [08:39:20] <_wooz> l [08:39:33] _wooz: what? [08:39:51] <_wooz> lo [08:40:06] <_wooz> nothing.. just hello! [08:40:12] ah [08:50:47] 03(mod) Provide preference-based autoformatting for unlinked dates - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582 (10s.r.e.turner) [09:12:34] 03siebrand * r43292 10/trunk/extensions/MetavidWiki/languages/MV_Messages.php: Message update [09:42:26] 03(mod) Provide preference-based autoformatting for unlinked dates - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582 (10cyp) [09:51:12] hello everybody [09:51:44] hi [09:51:47] is there a 'good and secure' way to leave an email on a page of my wiki ? to avoid spamming robots collector [09:52:06] pingouin: use builtin emailing [09:52:16] pingouin: hang, on a second [09:52:26] *pingouin stop moving [09:52:35] *pingouin stop thinking [09:52:42] *pingouin stop breathing [09:52:53] resume [09:53:12] :) [09:53:18] [[Special:EmailUser/pingouin|email]] [09:53:23] pingouin: that's what you want [09:53:32] and what I use ;) [09:54:00] hmmm miam i check that on the doc , many thanks tc-rucho [09:54:28] wtf is miam [09:55:15] :) [09:55:29] french sound for yummi/yummmy ? i guess [09:55:36] oh, I see [09:55:46] *tc-rucho is emerging wtf [09:55:53] oh yeah, i'm a frog ;) [09:56:09] if you say so... [09:56:11] :P [09:57:04] miam: nothing appropriate [09:57:08] hmm [09:57:10] lol [09:57:43] *pingouin lost the track ;) [09:57:59] !special [09:57:59] --mwbot-- I don't know anything about "special". You might try: !allmessages !bom !credit !dpl !export !extensiondistributor !import !info !interwiki !lockdown !mw !renameuser !rev !sidebar !specialpages !version [10:02:03] hi [10:02:25] could get anything briocken when I put a category in [[MediaWiki:Shareduploadconflict}} [10:14:15] Forrester: That may show a category at the bottom of the page when it's used, but otherwise I don't think so. Try it. [10:52:14] 03(NEW) Special page based on MediaWiki:Shareduploadconflict - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16280 normal; normal; MediaWiki: Special pages; (forrester.wikipedia) [10:52:32] 03(mod) Special page based on MediaWiki:Shareduploadconflict - 10https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16280 (10forrester.wikipedia) [11:15:33] is there any good editing applications you can run on your computer to edit mediawiki pages [11:18:25] Do you know AutoWikiBrowser or what do you mean? [11:31:31] DrJ, ! [11:31:57] ? [11:32:06] hi [11:32:09] hello [11:32:25] if you use windows [11:32:32] AutoWikiBrowser would probably suffice [11:50:02] Does anyone know where the "You have got new messages"-message is built? [11:57:07] tc-rucho: do you have any links on mediawiki doc about the [[Special:EmailUser]] syntax/explanation , can't find, sorry. [11:57:30] !Emailuser [11:57:30] --mwbot-- I don't know anything about "emailuser". [11:57:41] !Special:EmailUser [11:57:41] --mwbot-- I don't know anything about "special:emailuser". [11:57:53] !Syntax [11:57:53] --mwbot-- For help with MediaWiki's Wikitext syntax, please see . For an (incomplete) formal specification, see . [11:58:21] !jr-ewing [11:58:21] --mwbot-- I don't know anything about "jr-ewing". [11:58:34] oops [12:09:00] can anyone tell me witch extension is used to make the sections (users, system administrators, developers, ...) on the frontpage of www.mediawiki.org? [12:15:35] Zenith|at|home: none. See [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] in your wiki. [12:17:52] Zenith|at|home: oops, wrong answer. It's just a bunch of templates. See http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Main_page&action=edit [12:18:28] siebrand> I was already puzzled ;) I'll have a look, thanks [12:18:33] Zenith|at|home: the extension ParserFunctions is used for conditionals like #ifexist. [12:23:05] 03ialex * r43293 10/trunk/extensions/Collection/collection/ (jquery.js jquery.ui.js): svn:eol-style native [12:50:48] hey RoanKattouw [12:53:22] Hey [12:59:04] Hi. In an extension I want to pass a query result to wikitext. How can I do this? http://rafb.net/p/mupQI110.html I tried a lot, but always failed. Otherwise I wouldn't ask. [12:59:36] $wgParser->recursiveTagParse( $text ) [13:00:12] Subfader: You might wanna use Database::select() to run your queries rather than building SQL manually and running it through Database::query(). select() will handle all escaping for you [13:01:08] Subfader: What currently happens? Do you get unparsed wikitext, or nothing at all? [13:01:21] RoanKattouw: he'll get unparsed wikitext. [13:01:23] It will be on Main Page with disabledCache. So as light as possible for the db is good [13:01:28] Right [13:01:40] Then you need recursiveTagParse() just like werdnus said [13:01:43] so he should use $wgParser->recursiveTagParse() :) [13:02:04]