[00:53:18] hello, is it ok to have an item just for wikinews articles? [00:53:42] this for example is for a 2013 explosion https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17599292 [00:53:57] but we have wikipedia articles on that too: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11333034 [00:54:10] UAwiki: yes it(s totally ok [00:54:16] ah [00:54:18] hello Harmonia_Amanda [00:54:30] I'(ll see your example [00:54:36] ùmaybe we should merge [00:54:37] because those are instance of "Wikinews article" [00:54:50] and "language of work or name" [00:55:09] mmmh [00:55:13] if I merge them, that "language of work or name" would be odd, right? [00:55:49] yes but in this case, I would scrap the "instance of" and the language of work [00:56:09] because there is only one wikinews article in each Wikinews about the subject [00:56:29] usually, when there is a Wikipedia article, there are several corresponding wikinews ones [00:56:37] so we can't merge [00:56:42] oh [00:56:48] but here a merge wouldn't shock me [00:56:54] I see [00:57:24] ok, I will do it like that, thank you very much [00:57:30] UAwiki: :) [00:58:44] like https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q19455277 one Wikipedia article but 33 Wikinews articles... https://fr.wikinews.org/wiki/Dossier:Iditarod_2015#Articles_publi.C3.A9s_: [00:59:25] ohhhh [00:59:30] then, you link the dossier [00:59:34] yes [00:59:58] and each Wikinews article has "instance of : WN articl" [01:00:24] but in your case, seems like there is only ever one article in all the Wikinews [01:00:27] so you can merge [01:00:42] cool [01:01:02] thanks, I didn't know those dossier [01:01:37] no problem [01:05:13] PROBLEM - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1001 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: 100.00% of data above the critical threshold [300000.0] [01:09:03] RECOVERY - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1001 is OK: OK: Less than 5.00% above the threshold [120000.0] [02:17:03] PROBLEM - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1002 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: 100.00% of data above the critical threshold [300000.0] [02:18:55] RECOVERY - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1002 is OK: OK: Less than 5.00% above the threshold [120000.0] [08:04:33] is there a way to specify a date of birth as "before 1850" instead? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24014310 [08:06:45] a range like 1800-1850 would be fine too [08:07:36] XIXe century ? [08:09:47] salut Harmonia_Amanda [08:10:10] 19e, ce n'est pas assez précis [08:10:20] or a floruit if you have one [08:10:53] we know he wrote he was judge in 1870 [08:11:13] then a floruit should do [08:11:18] so he was certainly born before 1845 [08:11:40] which is much better regarding the copyright status [08:11:46] of his work [08:13:06] I think I've found a way [10:49:12] hmm... that new icon for ranks looks like a drag to reorder icon to me [11:20:56] PROBLEM - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1002 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: 100.00% of data above the critical threshold [300000.0] [11:26:55] RECOVERY - Response time of WDQS on wdqs1002 is OK: OK: Less than 5.00% above the threshold [120000.0] [13:41:41] * aude waves [14:05:34] so quiet... [14:06:11] * aude wonders if today is one of those evil german holidays :P [14:07:18] yup [14:07:18] ah [14:07:38] Ascension day, 40 days after Easter [14:07:45] ok [14:07:59] next evil holiday in 10 days [14:08:03] oh noes [14:08:09] and then we're done with the Easter ones. [14:10:04] Christian calendar asked to celebrate 3 things: 1. the Christ death and resurrection 2. the fact the Christ comes back to heavens. 3. the Holy Spirit joins the apostles [14:10:22] ah, ok [14:11:15] I'd like we switch the calendar more secular and nationwide holidays in Europe countries, as we're not going to add Muslim, atheist, etc. days. [14:11:25] That would create a more neutral space. [14:11:49] OR better: replace official holidays by days off people can take if they want to celebrate or spend time with their family/friends? [14:12:09] official holidays is brainwashing... [14:12:14] * aude always hated the supermarkets being closed [14:12:27] and it's imposed on everyone [14:13:20] in Belgium tomorrow every bank, administration, etc. will be closed too [14:13:57] When an holiday is a Thursdays, the public and financial sectors like to close also the Friday to create a 4 days weekend [14:14:09] :/ [14:17:57] aude: I hate the supermarkets being closed too :( [14:19:41] sundays are bad enough, but at least sundays are regular and predictable and don't just suddenly appear when I'm not expecting them [14:24:05] yesterday I went to the supermarket, like everyone else it seems, because the queue was so long, it reached almost halfway round the shop [14:38:46] aude: nikki: Here it's also Liberation day! [14:51:23] multichill: :o [14:51:53] here it's cinco de mayo, which means free tacos :) [14:53:33] multichill: Had a similar coincidence a while ago on a May 8th while visiting Germany with a friend who thought that the Germans celebrated end of WW2 that day. I replied "No, they don't, it's only a religious holiday today. The Germans don't celebrate the end of their war." :P [14:54:01] lol [14:54:22] :P [14:55:27] Liberation Day is only a national holiday once in 5 year of if it happens to be on Ascension day ;-) [15:17:39] SMalyshev: Is the query service load balanced and is one of the two lagging a bit? [15:29:58] multichill: Yes and yes [15:30:06] See https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-query-service [15:30:34] wdqs1001 has recently been rebuild and has been pooled recently, while still catching up to Wikidata [15:30:48] wdqs1002 can't stand the load alone, thus this was necessary [15:31:32] Ah, is the load balancing weighted or just round robin? [15:31:55] I don't know [15:32:08] At least that explains the differences on https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User:Multichill/Zandbak&action=history [15:33:29] yeah, probably [15:37:43] Grafana looks good btw hoo! Slick :-) [15:38:37] Yeah, it's quite fance [15:38:41] * fancy, even [18:30:32] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q3945503 <- do we have a bot running around that solves double redirects? [18:57:46] multichill: I've heard there is such bot, but don't remember which one [20:32:43] hi [20:33:13] I got a problem with adding a claim to item Q64976