[03:17:59] hello: we have a big problem here: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q25089&action=history [08:17:46] This proposal needs more reviews: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Polish_cultural_heritage_register_number [09:42:20] tobias47n9e: I've added a vote and comment :) [09:43:50] it looks pretty similar to germany's, which I've been wondering for a while how to enter [09:43:51] nikki: Thanks. [09:44:17] Well there is a lot of confusion about identifiers I think. [09:44:46] On Wikidata a lot of people think it is only an identifier if our items map to the authoritie's items 1:1 [09:45:02] And that is a very idealistic view of identifiers [09:45:44] We probably only have that for identifiers for people [09:45:55] not even then, I imagine [09:46:36] since people can change their name or use pseudonyms and have those treated differently by two different databases [09:46:51] True. That is a good example [11:40:00] Question for Multichill [11:42:31] [[:nl:Module:Wikidata]] is different from [[:en:Module:Wikidata]]. It seems that this version has more possibilities (like ''claim'', badges, etc) [11:42:32] Is that a newer version? [11:42:32] 10[4] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/:nl:Module:Wikidata13 => [11:42:35] 10[5] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/:en:Module:Wikidata [12:49:09] nikki: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/330145/ [14:00:36] Lydia_WMDE: that was quick :) [14:50:12] RODEJONG: Versioning of LUA modules is a bit of a nightmare [14:51:41] Yeah. I believe that. We're trying to get some of the modules working, and adding {{Wikidata}} to {{infoboks}} on DAWP [14:51:42] 10[6] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:Wikidata13 => [14:51:45] 10[7] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:infoboks [14:58:04] Would someone from Wikidata be able to help us understand the matter better? There isn't really a good explanation of how to implement Wikidata in infoboxes for example Multichill [15:35:57] RODEJONG: My plan was to have the other wikipedia's do all the hard work and once it works, copy it ;-) [15:39:46] RODEJONG, the English Wikipedia Telescope infobox templates uses Wikidata. Maybe that'll help you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_telescope [15:40:04] Thanks, I'll take a look [15:40:09] :) [16:31:18] addshore: I have a few more nasty things to speed up the mediawiki test suite :] [16:31:33] addshore: one sure thing: addDBDataOnce() is evil [16:31:39] i saw the 3 patches :) [16:31:54] doesnt let you reset the database :( [19:24:35] ANyone here want a LARGE bot job? [19:25:41] To change ALL Swedish item descriptions that are "grensida" to Wikimedia-förgreningssida" [19:26:00] bad name for Swedish disambiguation pages... [19:27:05] whoa, almost 1M items [19:27:15] yeah [19:28:07] Somo one, some time way back picked that as the Swedish transaltion, and I've always been meaning to act on that it just say "disambig page" [19:28:13] Some* [19:29:16] förgreningssida is even better than just grensida... [19:30:58] might be a nice opportunity to play with linked data fragments use in a bot: https://query.wikidata.org/bigdata/ldf?subject=&predicate=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2Fdescription&object=%22grensida%22%40sv [19:31:11] (though SPARQL also works: https://query.wikidata.org/#SELECT%20%3Fitem%20WHERE%20%7B%0A%20%20%3Fitem%20schema%3Adescription%20%22grensida%22%40sv.%0A%7D) [20:45:38] does https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q296260&diff=423838680&oldid=423488533 make any sense to anyone? who on earth is claiming a sport and a disambiguation page are the same thing? [20:47:19] nope, I’d remove that claim as well [20:51:04] I wonder if the russian description says something else, it's not the first time they've undone my edits for reasons I don't understand [20:58:58] Can somebody tell me, how I can get the pageID of a wikipage from the Wikidata-Q-ID via API? [21:06:07] lol I guessed the user before seeing the diff