[10:54:01] Dispatch could be lower, but we have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ValterVBot [10:54:14] Your dream is still true, nikki [10:54:31] 75 edits per minute [10:54:50] looks like dispatch pending is going up again :( [10:55:00] :/ [10:58:22] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Topic:Tuurt1bfx8tzo0ql [11:30:10] WikidataFacts: Are you open for new standard contraints? :-) [11:30:48] multichill: you’re free to open a task on Phabricator :) [11:30:58] but there are already a few unimplemented constraint types [11:31:05] Not sure how feasible it is [11:31:06] and a few other things planned before I tackle those [11:34:27] WikidataFacts: shocking results! english is 4th https://pastebin.com/raw/DhR3358T [11:34:41] that should be all of them, assuming I didn't mess something up [11:34:47] whoa! thanks [11:35:00] Take for example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27036653 . It has RKDimages (P350) on it. This property should have creator (check). But the extra contraint would be that the creator (or one of the creators) needs to have RKDartists (P650) [11:35:36] Currently I have it at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/Complex_constraint_violations/P650#Works_with_creator_missing_link [11:36:33] Actually also on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/Complex_constraint_violations/P350#Items_with_creator_not_linked_to_RKDartists [11:38:40] WikidataFacts: Worth making it standard? Not sure [11:38:55] hm, not sure [11:39:09] it’s like item requires claim + target requires claim, right? [11:39:29] might be a good idea to collect examples of constraints we'd like but can't do yet, see if there's any which would be useful more generally [11:40:38] WikidataFacts: Exactly, the two of them combined [11:41:03] Agree nikki, the complex constraints are probably a good start for that [11:42:32] * nikki nods [12:17:55] Interesting. https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-datamodel-statements [12:18:01] The Instance of counts one. [12:18:25] huh [12:19:00] is that direct P31 statements or does it also use P279? [12:20:03] Good question. [12:21:13] must use P279, there’s only two direct instances of artificial entity http://tinyurl.com/yb8us3mp [12:21:46] and then this jump might be caused by a single P279 statement having been added [12:21:55] Something must have been added to the tree then.. [12:39:13] 4 million is a lot, wonder if it's something like "category" being counted twice [12:59:23] If the primary sources tool got his attention, I wish VIAF would donate their matches. [13:19:02] "TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluating 'data.entities.hasOwnProperty')" when trying to use the move gadget. [13:31:33] it's not possible to say a constraint is mandatory if it has any exceptions, is it? [13:36:51] nikki: IMO it is, and at least the constraints extension won’t complain [13:37:01] not sure what KrBot thinks about that though :) [13:37:07] let's see then [13:37:33] though the extension doesn’t know about the constraint status yet, that’ll come with the next deployment [13:37:41] 'cause I know every entry in this dataset has coordinates, except one, so except for that one exception, coordinates should be mandatory [13:38:52] technically even that one has coordinates, but I'm not going to consider 0, 0 real data :P [13:41:33] it complains on the talk page [13:41:43] ""exceptions" is incompatible with "mandatory" parameter" [13:42:14] hrm [14:14:58] I wish I could add titles to sparql queries [14:15:14] I lost a query I did recently, trying to find it in the history but haha no chance [14:36:35] why is it, that I can't edit/add statements to [[Q253936]]. It's the only item which appears to me like that. Page is not protected [[Special:Log/Q253936]]. [14:36:35] 10[3] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25393613 => [14:36:38] 10[4] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Log/Q253936 [14:37:28] Ptolusque: purge the page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Item_pages_not_loading_fully [14:39:15] WikidataFacts: Thanks! adding "?action=purge" works. [16:03:15] No me deja editar este elemento ---> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18338406 [16:04:32] ? [16:04:47] I guess he asks why he can't edit the item [16:04:52] (not using translator) [16:05:04] quimper200: try https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18338406?action=purge [16:05:39] Search is even more broken than that, try for example "George". The female given name (what?) is listed first, the male one is somewhere deep down. [16:06:48] sjoerddebruin: never heard of the The Fameous Five? ;) [16:06:51] *Famous [16:07:41] oh, but apparently that George doesn’t even have a Wikidata item, boo :D [16:08:11] try "Michael", the first result is a badminton player without sitelinks [16:40:47] I get the male name first for george and michael, probably depends on the interface language [16:42:16] WikidataFacts: but it wasn't her real name and from what I remember (been a long time XD) she liked being mistaken for a boy, so I'd say that's a bit of an exception :P [16:43:06] yeah :D [18:30:51] Is there documentation somewhere for the page wikidata.org/wiki/Special:SetSiteLink ? [18:33:35] what kind of? [18:34:46] Perhaps most importantly, the page does not explain what a sitelink is. [18:40:47] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Glossary#Sitelink ? [19:49:30] ohh the glossary page looks nice! I used to the old ugly version [20:44:31] dispatch pending is *barely* going down :( [20:47:12] I don't see any really hight editing rates. http://wikidata.wikiscan.org/?menu=live&filter=all&sort=weight&date=6&list=users [21:07:36] at least it is going down and not up