[05:35:36] <PabloBusatto-PT->	 Hello, is there a tool that returns all items from a list of possible values for a given external identifier? e.g.: I would like to know all the items that have P356 = ("0261-3077" OR "0028-0836" OR "" 2535-7492 "OR ...) and it returns Q11148, Q180445, Q64692267 ...
[05:35:36] <PabloBusatto-PT->	 Through the search bar, I'm limited to 300 characters, Wikidata resolving only allows you to consult one value at a time, and through Petscan I couldn't.
[06:09:22] <melderick>	 PabloBusatto-PT-: https://w.wiki/Tj6
[06:10:13] <melderick>	 I don't know how many values you can put though
[06:11:17] <PabloBusatto-PT->	 melderick: Thank you so much =D
[06:19:57] <PabloBusatto-PT->	 melderick: It worked wonderfully, for more than 10,000 values. Thank you! = D
[06:20:11] <melderick>	 yw :)
[18:47:00] <icinga-wm>	 PROBLEM - wikidata-alerts grafana alert on icinga1001 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: Wikidata Alerts ( https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/TUJ0V-0Zk/wikidata-alerts ) is alerting: Edits: below 30 per minute (for 3 minutes). https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMDE/Wikidata/Alerts https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/TUJ0V-0Zk/
[18:50:04] <Alaa|away>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255179
[19:03:30] <icinga-wm>	 RECOVERY - wikidata-alerts grafana alert on icinga1001 is OK: OK: Wikidata Alerts ( https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/TUJ0V-0Zk/wikidata-alerts ) is not alerting. https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMDE/Wikidata/Alerts https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/TUJ0V-0Zk/
[20:20:27] <so_many_question>	 hi, how can a title of a wikipedia page be updated if it is not correct? in the specific case I am looking at it is missing a space.
[20:21:19] <so_many_question>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPGMail should be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPG_Mail
[20:22:18] <Reedy>	 Move it :)
[20:22:19] <Reedy>	 (done)
[20:22:46] <so_many_question>	 thanks Reedy
[20:23:19] <Reedy>	 You'll have to find someone on zhwiki to move it there I guess
[20:23:46] <so_many_question>	 not sure what zhwiki is. 
[20:27:05] <so_many_question>	 and a probably more complicated question: the german page of GPG Suite uses wikidata to receive the latest version info. that is a smart mechanism, but the en version of GPG Mail seems to ignore that info or I am not understanding the wikidata relationship between GPG Mail and GPG Suite. GPG Mail is part of GPG Suite. But the en WP page for GPG
[20:27:05] <so_many_question>	 Mail does not seem to update the latest GPG Suite info as the german GPG Suite WP page does.
[20:28:44] <Reedy>	 chinese wiki
[20:29:11] <andre__>	 so_many_question: See the links on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q164450 
[20:30:05] <andre__>	 that's not https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5514167
[20:31:17] <Reedy>	 Different wikis have different policies about populating infoboxes from wikidata
[20:32:38] <so_many_question>	 yeah I am aware of the two wikidata entries and that they are not the same. but wikidata for GPG Suite is uptodate and version for GPG Mail has been added. but it does not show in en WP page for GPG Mail.
[20:33:03] <Reedy>	 It won't
[20:33:04] <andre__>	 Why should it?
[20:33:06] <Reedy>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GPG_Mail&action=edit
[20:33:11] <Reedy>	 | latest_release_version = 4.0 (part of GPG Suite 2019.2)
[20:33:11] <Reedy>	 | latest_release_date    = {{Start date|2019|11|15}}<ref>{{cite website|url=https://gpgtools.org/releases/gpgsuite/release-notes.html|title=GPG Suite Release Notes|accessdate=November 21, 2019}}</ref>
[20:33:12] <AsimovBot>	 10[1] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:Start_date13 =>
[20:33:15] <AsimovBot>	 10[2] 04https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:cite_website
[20:34:02] <so_many_question>	 Reedy that seems a way to manually edit that info. wouldn't it be smarter to automatically grab that info from wikidata?
[20:34:13] <Reedy>	 It might, yes
[20:34:19] <Reedy>	 But not all wiki policies allow this
[20:34:38] <so_many_question>	 hm ok. not sure which policy prevents it in this case
[20:35:08] <so_many_question>	 seems much smarter as then no matter the language the article is in, the article would always have the correct info. that is quite a convincing mechanism.
[20:35:39] <Reedy>	 Some projects don't like wikidata
[20:35:45] <Reedy>	 Unfortunately, it's just how ti is
[20:36:13] <so_many_question>	 what do you mean with project?
[20:36:25] <Reedy>	 english wikipedia in this case
[20:36:34] <Reedy>	 IIRC, the french wikipedia is very anti wikidata
[20:36:35] <Reedy>	 Or was
[20:36:56] <so_many_question>	 that sounds like a very bad idea. can you share why they came to that conclusion?
[20:37:05] <so_many_question>	 do they like outdated info?
[20:37:22] <Reedy>	 Wikidata isn't guaranteed to be up to date though :)
[20:37:25] <so_many_question>	 I mean US voted for trump so nothing surprises me...
[20:37:37] <so_many_question>	 well the same holds true for the separate articles right?
[20:37:41] <Reedy>	 Right
[20:37:47] <so_many_question>	 so that is an invalid argument
[20:37:48] <Reedy>	 I'm not saying that we shouldn't load stuff from wikidata
[20:37:51] <Reedy>	 No it's not
[20:37:57] <so_many_question>	 how so?
[20:38:26] <Reedy>	 One wiki could have the right version when wikidata doesn't
[20:38:35] <Reedy>	 As above, I'm not saying it's correct. But it's how it is
[20:38:37] <Reedy>	 People don't like change
[20:38:39] <so_many_question>	 again, that concept does not scale well
[20:38:47] <so_many_question>	 people have to adapt
[20:38:49] <Reedy>	 Great. Go argue that with each wiki
[20:38:50] <Reedy>	 I'll wait
[20:39:11] <so_many_question>	 heh :)  well if I knew how to change the box I probably would
[20:40:02] <Reedy>	 Not just how, it's having the rights
[20:40:10] <Reedy>	 It's locked to admins and template editors
[20:40:10] <so_many_question>	 wp is quite funny. iirc germany wp even removed GPG Mail due to irrelevance. that's quite amazing
[20:40:14] <so_many_question>	 oh boy
[20:40:25] <so_many_question>	 so how can I reach the elite?
[20:40:25] <Reedy>	 Oh look
[20:40:26] <Reedy>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_software#Wikidata_website_info
[20:40:49] <Reedy>	 That basically illustrates the people complaining
[20:41:00] <so_many_question>	 you mean the attack site / can't remove malware link thing?
[20:41:00] <Reedy>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_software#Taking_more_data_from_wikidata
[20:41:57] <so_many_question>	 so I just give up?
[20:42:36] <so_many_question>	 what about https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPGTools is that manual?
[20:43:00] <Reedy>	 I don't know, look at the source
[20:43:07] <Reedy>	 I suspect there's things you can spend your time on that are more fruitful
[20:43:52] <so_many_question>	 yeah it's also using wikidata
[20:44:05] <so_many_question>	 well so it is uptodate. now isn't that just fascinating
[20:45:52] <Reedy>	 Wiki politics
[20:46:17] <so_many_question>	 y have heard those are frustrating. glad I am not involved too much, sounds like lots of wasted time.
[20:47:29] <so_many_question>	 ok thanks for helping me out Reedy, I do appreciated that a lot.
[20:47:56] <Reedy>	 np :)
[20:47:59] <Reedy>	 Like I say, I don't disagree
[20:48:09] <Reedy>	 But the argument isn't worth the effort
[20:48:38] <so_many_question>	 I got that. happy to argue with someone representing the en community as I am quite convinced wikidata is the better concept. it's very simple: it scales.
[20:49:13] <Reedy>	 It does sound like it's coming from that second talk page link
[20:49:24] <so_many_question>	 hehe
[20:49:33] <Reedy>	 It's only taken 7.5 years
[20:49:46] <Reedy>	 Though, at wikidata creation, this wasn't possible ;)
[20:49:56] <so_many_question>	 🙉