[14:01:53] <_joe_> hi :) do you have a timeline on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T130692 ? [14:02:22] "jcrespo moved this task from Backlog to Next on the DBA board." [14:02:41] <_joe_> yeah that I can see :P [14:02:49] So? [14:02:55] <_joe_> I was wondering if you have an idea how long it would take [14:03:19] <_joe_> because I have to time my work for https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T86096 based on that :) [14:03:47] <_joe_> tl;dr I have to rebuild hhvm for trusty with the newer libicu and when I do that it's an irreversible change [14:04:09] do you want me to delay or speed that? [14:04:28] <_joe_> just know when do you think you might be done [14:04:46] <_joe_> approximatively, like this week, next week, in a month [14:05:00] last week is the last estimation [14:05:43] that still stands [14:10:47] it says it is blocked on that, but that is false [14:11:13] even with that applied, appling that change to all wikis would fail without a script update [14:11:30] <_joe_> uhm [14:11:47] <_joe_> ok that was not clear at all :) [14:12:18] and even without it, if the update script was updated, it would not be an blocker [14:13:05] my change only makes it easier [17:22:22] jynus: Re T134136 what was the old name/new name there? [17:22:22] T134136: Heavy query from CheckUser extension caused replica lag on all S1 slaves - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134136 [17:22:33] Renames are publicly logged so it's not private data [17:23:12] not sure if volans_ will have that info more handy [17:23:27] if not, I can try to get it again from logs [17:26:03] ah [17:26:14] I think the 0 was sanitized data [17:26:46] so it was my wrong interpretation [17:27:27] or not? [17:27:51] no no, it is 0 [17:28:02] Glaisher: yes I have it [17:28:34] volans_, it is this one, right? https://tendril.wikimedia.org/report/slow_queries_checksum?checksum=4ae85c505b6b0e6fe4fe7bf7f8f57c98&host=db1057&user=wikiuser&schema=enwiki&hours=48 [17:28:47] if yes, I can continue, go back to your business [17:29:25] jynus, Glaisher yes confirmed [17:29:38] is that one [17:30:09] so, I can share the full query to NDA-signed people if you are interested [17:30:48] it actually happened twice [17:31:09] Does the other RenameuserSQL queries for that user have the same 0 id? [17:31:20] yes [17:31:28] although I think it is not an id [17:31:50] cuc_user is an foreign key or a flag? [17:32:21] It's a foreign key for user.user_id but there is no actual constraint on the db side [17:32:29] of course [17:32:33] I meant conceptually [17:33:19] at this point I would turn that into a security issue/UBN, but your call [17:33:48] let me paste the too instances on a resticted paste [17:33:59] I think legoktm is in a better position to decide on that :) [17:34:11] hi [17:34:14] (cc'd him) [17:34:16] as in any case it contains private info [17:34:18] link? [17:34:26] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134136 [17:36:42] I've shared the instances I found, I think now it is in your hands [17:37:43] jynus, Glaisher: I marked the task as security and commented [17:38:33] legoktm, thanks [18:57:52] db1040 new jessue/mariadb 10 host