[07:51:42] good morning DBAs, not sure if you've seen it yet, db1054 has an Icinga alert for "must have write cache policy WriteBack, currently using: WriteThrough" [07:52:20] moritzm: yeah, we are aware [07:52:24] we have planned a failover for it [07:52:31] it is s2 primary master [07:52:34] the BBU is broken [07:52:56] ok, sorry for the noise :-) [07:53:07] no, thank you for double checking if we noticed it! [09:00:42] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10Multi-Content-Revisions, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-Addshore: Change DEFAULT 0 for rev_text_id on production DBs - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190148#4235714 (10Marostegui) [09:01:03] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10Multi-Content-Revisions, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-Addshore: Change DEFAULT 0 for rev_text_id on production DBs - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190148#4209452 (10Marostegui) 05Open>03Resolved This is all done [09:06:51] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-Ladsgroup, 10Wikidata-Ministry-Of-Magic: Schema change for rc_namespace_title_timestamp index - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191519#4235733 (10Marostegui) [09:07:11] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-Ladsgroup, 10Wikidata-Ministry-Of-Magic: Schema change for rc_namespace_title_timestamp index - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191519#4209570 (10Marostegui) This is all done [09:07:19] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-Ladsgroup, 10Wikidata-Ministry-Of-Magic: Schema change for rc_namespace_title_timestamp index - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191519#4235735 (10Marostegui) 05Open>03Resolved [09:10:55] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Platform-Team (MWPT-Q4-Apr-Jun-2018), 10Patch-For-Review: Schema change for refactored actor storage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T188299#4209552 (10Marostegui) [09:11:54] 10Blocked-on-schema-change, 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Platform-Team (MWPT-Q4-Apr-Jun-2018), 10Patch-For-Review: Schema change for refactored actor storage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T188299#4209571 (10Marostegui) Only the master is now pending, which will be done probably on Wednesday EU morning. I have... [13:12:22] <_joe_> jynus, marostegui so regarding the multi-dc goal, did you need my feedback on something specific or just on the overall current architecture? [13:12:41] <_joe_> (re: connection pooling) [13:13:19] you saud you wanted to comment [16:23:51] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10Goal, 10Patch-For-Review: Convert all sanitarium hosts to multi-instance and increase its reliability/redundancy - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190704#4236872 (10Marostegui) The definitive hardware for codfw is now in place and replicating: db2094: s1, s3, s5, s8 db2095: s2, s... [16:24:12] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10Goal, 10Patch-For-Review: Convert all sanitarium hosts to multi-instance and increase its reliability/redundancy - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190704#4236873 (10Marostegui) [16:26:24] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10Goal, 10Patch-For-Review: Convert all sanitarium hosts to multi-instance and increase its reliability/redundancy - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190704#4236874 (10Marostegui) [17:43:47] Is doing things such as /*+ MAX_EXECUTION_TIME(1000) */ in our sql statements a possible option? [17:44:09] is that allows? / does it even work on mariadb? [17:47:25] or something similar. [17:49:00] it looks like you can do something similar, SET STATEMENT max_statement_time=100 FOR (STATEMENT HERE...), in 10.1.2 of mariadb [17:49:39] and it actually works, ooooh [17:49:50] (thinking about wb_terms table here) [18:16:02] 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Database: Create Mediawiki DB abstraction for individual query timeouts - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195792#4237149 (10Addshore) [18:16:08] ^^ :) [19:21:06] 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Database: Create Mediawiki DB abstraction for individual query timeouts - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195792#4237149 (10jcrespo) This is a duplicate (sort of) T149421 T64615 T60985 T113552 which in the past, I got a lot of push back. > In WMF production we appear to be using mariadb...