[00:27:19] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Papaul)
[00:49:50] <wikibugs>	 10DBA: Decommission old coredb machines (<=db2042) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221533 (10Marostegui) Yeah: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T224456#5218280
[00:59:03] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations: db2091 rebooted unexpectedly - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T224393 (10Marostegui) I am running a compare on db2091 now to check its data consistency
[02:13:41] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Papaul)
[02:14:20] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Papaul) @Marostegui @jcrespo All your's you can take this task anytime.
[02:26:51] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Marostegui) 05Open→03Resolved Thanks! They all look good! ` 4 hosts will be targeted: dbproxy[2001-2004].codfw.wmnet Confirm to continue [y/n]? y ===== NODE GROUP ====...
[02:27:08] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Marostegui)
[02:28:16] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10Marostegui)
[02:29:37] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10ops-codfw, 10Patch-For-Review: rack/setup/install dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223492 (10Marostegui)
[02:29:39] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10Marostegui)
[07:21:53] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10jcrespo) CCing @Dzahn as he expressed interest for this to happen in the past, and finally the hardware is here (no actionable needed from you at the moment).
[11:13:17] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Wikimedia-Site-requests: Global rename of Fiona B. → Fiona*: supervision needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T224348 (10jcrespo) 05Open→03Stalled I suggested the user to wait and she agreed. I will keep track of the deployment progress and if it gets too delayed, suggest to do it in the old...
[11:50:42] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10Marostegui) @jcrespo what did you have in mind for those 4 new proxies in codfw? Maybe we can allocate 1 of them for m3 so we can unblock T190572?  Right now misc services act...
[13:06:25] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10jcrespo) >>! In T202367#5220374, @Marostegui wrote: > @jcrespo what did you have in mind for those 4 new proxies in codfw? > Maybe we can allocate 1 of them for m3 so we can u...
[13:07:10] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10Marostegui) Sounds good!
[21:19:09] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10wikitech.wikimedia.org: Rename database 'labswiki' to 'wikitechwiki' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T171570 (10Krinkle)
[21:32:07] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize dbproxy101[2-7].eqiad.wmnet and dbproxy200[1-4] - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202367 (10Dzahn) >>! In T202367#5219604, @jcrespo wrote: > CCing @Dzahn as he expressed interest for this to happen in the past, and finally the hardware is here (no actionable needed f...