[16:51:32] howief: You wanted article asssessment data and something with Frank's stuff, right? What was the latter exactly again? [16:53:32] RoanKattouw, I think it has to do with http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Article_feedback/Public_Policy_Pilot/Workgroup#Influence_on_account_creation_.26_editing [16:53:47] Oh that thing [16:53:54] I ran some queries for that at *some* point [16:55:29] Trying to look up exactly what [16:58:59] guillom: Oh that's just the account creation after review thing, I've got that automated already *phew*. Also, WTF's up with that student project question? ^^ [16:59:42] RoanKattouw, I just answered that. I think it's someone unhappy with the fact students and professors are self-promoting their work (i.e. it's a PPI question, not for us). [17:00:02] Oh OK [19:52:23] RoanKattouw: hows it going? [19:53:27] Pretty much packed up, leaving for AMS in the morning [19:57:56] did you notice my change to debug mode yet? [19:58:33] Read about it on wikitech-l [19:58:37] Have not seen the code yet [19:58:52] But it's very neat [19:58:56] Can't believe we didn't think of this :) [19:59:17] he he - well, we've had to invent like a thousand things [19:59:26] mdale was very helpful here [19:59:28] it's a nice hack, i like it :D [19:59:47] it could fail in pure xhtml mode though, as document.write may not work [20:00:07] but if you stick in an exception for when mime type's set to application/xhtml+xml that should be fine [20:00:10] I think RL uses document.write in the startup module too [20:00:30] brion: How would it fail exactly? Maybe we can call then detect the failure rather than guess if it will fail [20:00:44] not sure if it throws an exception or just sorta dies [20:01:16] but basically, in xml mode you can't do document.write() to add things into the document; you need to DOM it up [20:01:41] adding a