[11:40:45] <tinajohnson__>	 Hi qgil tonythomas
[11:46:22] <qgil>	 hi tinajohnson__
[11:46:38] <qgil>	 Will we meet in Ramallah?  :)
[11:47:22] <tinajohnson__>	 Not in Ramallah.. but Jerusalem, yes!
[11:47:55] <qgil>	 Also good.  I'm looking forward.
[11:48:15] <tinajohnson__>	 I checked with my university and I've my project reviews on Ramallah dates :\
[11:48:50] <qgil>	 When University gets in the way of actually learning something new...  :/
[11:49:15] <tinajohnson__>	 I know right :\
[11:49:21] <qgil>	 Any progress in Newsletter?
[11:49:27] <tinajohnson__>	 any updates from csteipp ?
[11:49:44] <qgil>	 No, but I am still trusting his word
[11:49:53] <qgil>	 (We should trust the Security devs, right)
[11:50:08] <tinajohnson__>	 hehe yes
[11:50:17] <tinajohnson__>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/mediawiki-extensions-newsletter/
[11:50:19] <qgil>	 Slightly related, I have added https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124288 to my backlog
[11:50:36] <qgil>	 That is the task that should plug this extension with the Product Development Process
[11:50:54] <qgil>	 hence making it a hard requirement
[11:51:03] <tinajohnson__>	 ah I see
[11:52:19] <tinajohnson__>	 in  the feature complete section, there's one more task which needs a patch
[11:52:27] <tinajohnson__>	 which is the logging one
[11:54:44] <qgil>	 About caching, I think Glaisher had mention (on IRC?) that it is not a blocker for deployment
[11:54:47] <qgil>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119060
[11:55:28] <tinajohnson__>	 yeah, it's under the Needs Discussion column right ?
[11:56:10] <tinajohnson__>	 shouldn't be a blocker
[12:00:49] <qgil>	 tinajohnson__, moved (sorry, was away)
[12:01:58] <tinajohnson__>	 thank you!
[12:04:16] <qgil>	 tinajohnson__, several tasks in Feature complete have patches. I winder what is missing to resolve them...
[12:04:38] <qgil>	 All in all I think we need this security review in order to reciover the incentive of going for deployment
[12:04:45] <qgil>	 we seem to have lost a bit of push....
[12:04:46] <tinajohnson__>	 some tasks are not one-patch tasks
[12:05:02] <qgil>	 (which I cannot complain about, since I cannot code / review at all)  :)
[12:05:16] <tinajohnson__>	 like the https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T110491
[12:05:26] <tinajohnson__>	 yeah, I agree
[12:05:35] <tinajohnson__>	 you have been doing your part :)
[12:06:05] <tinajohnson__>	 I think the security review could be that push we require
[12:06:09] <qgil>	 Validation, I would close it as resolve, and then open bugs for any case that should be included or not working as expected
[12:07:00] <qgil>	 tinajohnson__, that task is assigned to you and you are asking whether it can be resolved.
[12:07:08] <qgil>	 Let's have a meeting decision and let's resolve it.  :)
[12:07:34] <tinajohnson__>	 yeah because Glaisher was saying there are some more validation he wanted to do
[12:08:11] <tinajohnson__>	 alright, let's resolve it then.. I'll comment saying further bugs can have separate tasks
[12:08:19] <qgil>	 Good.
[12:08:58] <qgil>	 More validation is surely good, but we need to distinguish deployment blockers from the rest.
[12:10:11] <qgil>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108301 got a new patch today, good.
[12:11:15] <tinajohnson__>	 commented
[12:11:35] <qgil>	 Then we have two tasks about Design review (MZ and violetto), but it is unclear to me what really is blocking deployment at this point.
[12:12:44] <qgil>	 I guess I need to sit down and spend some time testing the extension throughly myself. It has been a while since the last time,
[12:13:29] <tinajohnson__>	 okay :)
[12:13:38] <tinajohnson__>	 you always bring out good bugs
[12:13:55] <tinajohnson__>	 so review newsletter whenever you get time
[12:14:40] <qgil>	 OK. And if csteipp hasn't said anything by next Thursday, I will ping him again.
[12:15:01] <tinajohnson__>	 okay, great.
[12:16:06] <qgil>	 Ideally, the "old blocking tasks" should be resolved before the end of the month (before Jerusalem)
[12:16:35] <tinajohnson__>	 which ones do you mean ?
[12:16:43] <qgil>	 The security review will point to issues that need fixing asap (hopefully before Jerusalem, so we can use the time there)
[12:16:57] <qgil>	 The Feature Complete ones
[12:16:58] <tinajohnson__>	 you mean the feature complete tasks ?
[12:17:01] <tinajohnson__>	 ah okay
[12:17:37] <qgil>	 So, ideally, in April we could then start the actual deployment process in test, then mediawiki.org
[12:18:14] <tinajohnson__>	 yeah, that'd be great if things fall into place
[12:18:43] <qgil>	 (I took this task again as one of my quarterly goals, and I hope this is the last quarter this task remains open)  :)  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128448
[12:19:14] <qgil>	 OK, anything else?
[12:19:44] <tinajohnson__>	 I hope the task closes soon :)
[12:19:50] <tinajohnson__>	 nope, nothing from me
[12:20:02] <qgil>	 Alright, then. Thank you!
[12:20:30] <tinajohnson__>	 Thank you too.
[13:05:36] <tonythomas>	 qgil: tinajohnson__ : oops. sorry, I missed it again :(
[13:56:04] <tonythomas>	 addshore: hey! you around ?
[13:56:09] <addshore>	 hey yeh!
[13:56:46] <tonythomas>	 I was just wondering if we can merge https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120478 and  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120738 -- the list of contributors thing !
[13:57:12] <tonythomas>	 so you and samtar can join up in mentoring it out, making one featured, instead of two missing mentors !
[14:06:17] <addshore>	 yeh that basically seems like the same thing!
[15:00:48] <tonythomas>	 addshore: alright. I am merging them, now.
[15:01:14] <tonythomas>	 keeping the parent task = https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120738