[00:27:28] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 6Triagers, 6operations: Requests for addition to the #project-creators group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1815740 (10JAufrecht) I would like to join Project-Creators as a Team Practices Group Agile Coach who creates projects for teams doing work tr... [00:30:32] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 3DevRel-December-2015, 7Documentation: Make Phabricator "Creating and renaming projects" documentation page less confusing for people who want to have a project - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118304#1815782 (10Aklapper) [00:32:50] is it true that one can simply create a "release" phab project, but one must formally submit a request for a "goal" phab project? That's what https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Types_of_Projects says, but with no explanation of why [00:33:18] oh, was asked elsewhere...will read there first [00:34:14] no, i guess it wasn't asked elsewhere. andre__ if you're around ^ [00:40:35] zz_meeple27, that's not what the wikipage says [00:41:24] Goal says "Creation must be documented." It does not say "must be proposed and discussed before being created". If I don't get your question wrong [00:43:29] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815874 (10awight) I cannot access T118032 via the web UI, but I do vaguely remembering being able to access it on Nov 6, sounds right that I was trying to unsubscribe at that point.... [00:46:33] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815885 (10Bawolff) There has been no comments on the bug after the point you were unsubscribed(?) [00:47:08] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815886 (10Aklapper) Sorry, I was not clear in my last comment: The web UI states that you unsubscribed from the task on Nov 18, 23:29 (today). [00:49:51] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815920 (10awight) @Aklapper No, I didn't! Maybe that was a "feature" that fixes the permissions if a subscriber attempts to access a restricted task? Side question: How can I sear... [00:51:13] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815922 (10Krenair) >>! In T119013#1815920, @awight wrote: > Side question: How can I search for all tasks with visibility restricted to WMF FR? I'm trying to audit... I don't thin... [01:01:31] phabricator upgrade coming right up [01:03:56] nice [01:05:12] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815977 (10awight) Thanks for looking at this! Lemme make sure I'm being clear about my interactions with this private bug: * I started getting email notifications about T118032 on... [01:12:36] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1815990 (10Krenair) 5Open>3Invalid a:3Krenair >>! In T119013#1815977, @awight wrote: > * I started getting email notifications about T118032 on Nov 6, I'm not certain why. You... [01:22:24] 6Phabricator, 5Release: Next Phabricator Upgrade - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114994#1816011 (10mmodell) 5Open>3Resolved [01:30:11] all done [01:36:38] "merged 1 task(s): " [01:36:47] I thought they had plural support :/ [01:39:04] 6Phabricator, 6Security: Inconsistency to be aware of in Phabricator task visibility - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1816033 (10awight) Interesting. There is definitely a bug, but it might be different than I had thought. I've verified by my browser history that I did not unconsciously unsubscrib... [01:40:35] 6Phabricator: Phabricator unsubscribed me from a task? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1816034 (10Krenair) 5Invalid>3Open a:5Krenair>3None [01:43:42] 6Phabricator: Phabricator unsubscribed me from a task? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1816040 (10Krenair) >>! In T119013#1816033, @awight wrote: > I've verified by my browser history that I did not unconsciously unsubscribe from the bug. Well, it says you did it 'Via Web'. I imagine there's some log... [01:45:25] twentyafterfour, what sort of info can you see in the way of IPs? [01:45:54] phabricator client IPs? I can't see anything AFAIK. [01:46:10] they are masked by the proxy and we haven't fixed it to use the x-forwarded-for header [01:47:05] do we have a task for that? [01:47:16] I wanted to point the user above to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/activity/ [01:48:24] But it's mostly useless because it only shows cp1*.eqiad.wmnet IPs [01:50:13] 6Phabricator: Phabricator unsubscribed me from a task? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1816056 (10Krenair) Also, you recognise everything on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/activity/ and https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/sessions/ right? (The IPs there aren't particula... [01:50:21] Krenair: the task seems to be closed, or I'm just not able to find it [01:51:24] 6Phabricator: Phabricator unsubscribed me from a task? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119013#1816060 (10awight) /me pinches self I could have done this. Turns out, my browser (FF) history actually collapses multiple visits to the same URL, so there would be no way to tell if I were going crazy or not. [01:52:45] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T840 [01:53:04] Krenair: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114014 [01:53:26] Is the 'hacked' thing on http://javelinjs.com/ some sort of weird joke? [01:53:48] I don't know [01:54:07] I don't remember seeing it before.. [01:54:17] I'd say ask epriestley in #phabricator [04:46:41] Krenair: yes [04:48:53] 6Project-Creators: Create Upload-to-Commons-Android-App project - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118930#1816335 (10josephine_l) Thanks @Aklapper ! [15:34:25] twentyafterfour: did we pull in that fix for the upstream cleanup for T114014 then? [18:16:38] chasemp: I assume so? I pulled everything up to yesterday [18:17:35] we've got all the garbage collection policy stuff now for ensuring we don't retain data too long [18:55:13] 6Project-Creators, 6operations: create #ops-eqdfw & #ops-eqord projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117585#1818102 (10RobH) 5Open>3Resolved I've created both #ops-eqord and #ops-eqdfw. I then logged into the admin account and added both of those to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/herald/rule/15... [19:11:28] twentyafterfour: thanks i wasn't sure where prod was at -- I could have just looked :p it was early and I wasn't thinkiing [19:12:32] chasemp: no prob. btw I've got the deployment repo updated and I'm going to make sweeping changes to the puppet infrastructure so that a puppet run on a fresh machine will end up with working and current phabricator [19:12:46] cool [19:12:51] will test with labs and then try to figure out how to transition production to use it [19:13:13] problem with production is we have /srv/phab/repos which can't be recreated [19:13:25] and /srv/phab/ isn't based on my deployment repo at all [19:13:57] I might move /srv/phab/repos to a different location and replace it with a symlink that can exist in the deployment repo [19:14:19] there will be a chicken and egg problem once phabricator takes over git hosting [19:14:41] right [19:14:45] (realistically we should have a hot spare git server) [19:14:57] if not full phab mirror [19:14:59] that too [19:15:13] you sould say the github copy is the spare ...for now [19:15:16] not a good plan really but a plan [19:15:22] yeah [19:16:00] a private mirror of the git data would be easy enough to set up, security concerns would be lessened if it was on a private vlan [19:16:14] and it could use http hooks to update in real time [19:16:41] well actualy so CI has a full git-daemon that runs for labs things to pull repos [19:16:44] for CI things [19:16:47] I wonder how hard to just mirror their [19:16:51] there even [19:17:32] 6Phabricator: Phabricator has reverted to ugly default favicon - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119106#1818210 (10matmarex) 3NEW [19:33:42] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 6Triagers, 6operations: Requests for addition to the #project-creators group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1818287 (10Krenair) > IMPORTANT: all project creators are responsible of maintaining the [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Creatin... [19:37:29] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 6Triagers, 6operations: Requests for addition to the #project-creators group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1818300 (10Krenair) Actually, I just noticed 4 others from the same user. I suggest their permissions be removed. [19:49:27] chasemp: yeah, though I don't know if it's accessible outside of the CI project? [19:49:40] it's not in a labs project it's actually on a physical host in prod [19:49:45] scandium now I think it is [19:50:20] ohh? I was not at all aware of this [19:50:38] so this is different from the zuul-cloner cache that CI uses for fast clones? [19:51:00] I think this is the zuul-cloner thing but that is just a git-daemon instance on a host in prod [19:51:03] (a dedicated host at that) [19:51:08] could easily host mirrors I would think? [19:51:14] as well as specific revisions for CI [19:51:18] and ...maybe even should [19:51:22] worht a thought [19:51:56] hmm, yeah I'll keep that in mind. we definitely need a reliable mirror, at least internally, if only to bootstrap phabricator in case of a complete meltdown [19:52:50] in the back of my mind I was kind of thinkinga bout this too [19:53:08] seems like the obvious internal mirror (already accessible by all of labs too) [19:55:02] +prod [19:55:27] awesome [21:02:02] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 6Triagers, 6operations: Requests for addition to the #project-creators group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1818565 (10greg) >>! In T706#1818300, @Krenair wrote: > Actually, I just noticed 4 others from the same user. I suggest their permissions be r... [23:28:46] 6Phabricator, 6Project-Creators, 6Triagers, 6operations: Requests for addition to the #project-creators group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1819236 (10Krenair) After a brief discussion with the user involved, #Gadgets-2.0 has been reopened as a release project. I am going to propos...