[00:07:23] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988246 (10Luke081515) Ok, so if nobody has anything against this, I will change the documentation and decline the existing open task via bulk. [00:11:18] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988258 (10Luke081515) a:3Luke081515 [00:25:39] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988435 (10Legoktm) Um, what? Please re-open all those tasks. Open tasks that aren't moving anywhere right now are fine, someone will get to them in the future, eventually. There's no deadline. [00:31:01] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988449 (10Luke081515) But why we have more and more open tasks in future? If there is no consensus, this is definitely a blocker. So the backlog grows and grows, and this spams workboards. Th... [00:38:31] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988460 (10Vogone) This doesn't make any sense. Why do we need duplicate requests? And why would we want to wait until there is "no consensus"? [00:40:42] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988470 (10Danny_B) I totally agree with Legoktm. Please reopen. [00:41:30] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988471 (10Legoktm) >>! In T124354#1988449, @Luke081515 wrote: > But why we have more and more open tasks in future? If there is no consensus, this is definitely a blocker. No it's not alway... [00:43:11] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988476 (10matmarex) > Why do we have open tasks with #community-consensus-needed? Most of them will not get consensus in near future, so why are they open? I believe many of them "just" need... [00:51:40] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988529 (10Luke081515) >>! In T124354#1988471, @Legoktm wrote: >>>! In T124354#1988449, @Luke081515 wrote: >> So the backlog grows and grows, and this spams workboards. > > Please explain wh... [00:52:56] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988533 (10Legoktm) >>! In T124354#1988529, @Luke081515 wrote: >>>! In T124354#1988471, @Legoktm wrote: >>>>! In T124354#1988449, @Luke081515 wrote: >>> So the backlog grows and grows, and thi... [00:53:57] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988535 (10Luke081515) And why? [01:43:41] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988639 (10bd808) >>! In T124354#1988535, @Luke081515 wrote: > And why? I see only disadvantages, or are there any advantages? The Phabricator backlog (and the Bugzilla backlog before it) is... [01:59:45] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988659 (10MZMcBride) Please be cognizant of the large amount of e-mail that's generated when you perform bulk actions. :-) [02:05:11] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988666 (10Luke081515) >>! In T124354#1988659, @MZMcBride wrote: > Please be cognizant of the large amount of e-mail that's generated when you perform bulk actions. :-) Sorry... I did the firs... [02:14:48] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988692 (10Dereckson) Yes, please reopen all that. If you wish to process or close these tasks, ping the requesters and help them to get consensus, or let a message on the local project. [02:15:53] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988696 (10Dereckson) >>! In T124354#1988666, @Luke081515 wrote: >>>! In T124354#1988659, @MZMcBride wrote: >> Please be cognizant of the large amount of e-mail that's generated when you perfo... [02:19:43] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988706 (10Luke081515) >>! In T124354#1988692, @Dereckson wrote: > Yes, please reopen all that. Already done, see above. @bd808: I don't want to close them, because there are "stale"... that... [02:31:05] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988748 (10bd808) >>! In T124354#1988706, @Luke081515 wrote: > @bd808: I don't want to close them, because there are "stale"... that is not a decline reason in my opinion too. I just think tha... [03:43:19] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988831 (10Danny_B) >>! In T124354#1988666, @Luke081515 wrote: > Sorry... I did the first action because there was no one who said anything against this for more than two weeks... Did you dis... [07:30:57] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1988976 (10Nemo_bis) 5Open>3declined Most of those bugs are desirable, some can be closed (the discussion found issues but nobody bothered to wrap it up). The main problem is that many of... [07:37:23] 6Phabricator, 6Developer-Relations: Create google-summer-of-code-2016 project in Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125490#1988987 (1001tonythomas) 3NEW [12:18:39] 6Phabricator, 6Developer-Relations: Create google-summer-of-code-2016 project in Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125490#1989479 (10Aklapper) 5Open>3Resolved a:3Aklapper https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/1748/ [13:13:44] 6Phabricator: Restructuring of tasks with project community-consensus-needed - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124354#1989626 (10Ricordisamoa) The only thing here that needed "community consensus" were the bulk declinations... [14:47:27] 6Phabricator: Cannot highlight a Phabricator ticket number for copy/paste - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125518#1989816 (10maiden_taiwan) 3NEW [14:49:29] 6Phabricator: Cannot highlight a Phabricator ticket number for copy/paste - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125518#1989824 (10maiden_taiwan) This also happens in Chrome 48.0.2564.97 m. In Internet Explorer 11, in contrast, you can easily highlight the ticket number with the mouse. [14:50:19] 6Phabricator: Cannot highlight a Phabricator ticket number for copy/paste - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125518#1989827 (10valhallasw) Workaround: double-click the bug number in the URL bar to select, copy, paste. [15:28:54] 6Phabricator, 10Phabricator-Upstream: Cannot highlight a Phabricator ticket number for copy/paste - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125518#1989934 (10Luke081515) [16:27:25] 6Phabricator, 5Release, 7WorkType-Maintenance: Next Phabricator Upgrade - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120013#1990107 (10Luke081515) [16:29:33] 6Phabricator, 7Documentation: Figure out what upstream "Can Edit Task Policies" policy deprecation means for our Spaces/ACL setup - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T122556#1990113 (10Luke081515) [16:29:51] 6Phabricator, 7Documentation: Figure out what upstream "Can Edit Task Policies" policy deprecation means for our Spaces/ACL setup - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T122556#1907479 (10Luke081515) I think the main problem is solved by D113, so we can close this?