[13:19:33] 10Phabricator: Share the @Phabricator_maintenance account credentials (password) with at least one Phabricator Admin - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141641#2505701 (10Luke081515) Why you guys don't use https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/passphrase/? [13:24:13] 10Phabricator: Share the @Phabricator_maintenance account credentials (password) with at least one Phabricator Admin - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141641#2505701 (10Paladox) @Luke081515 they did. It is a private paste only a few have access too. Per @mmodell @Danny_B: please add credentials to this priv... [13:25:40] 10Phabricator: Share the @Phabricator_maintenance account credentials (password) with at least one Phabricator Admin - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141641#2507937 (10Paladox) Oh sorry your talking about passphase not paste. [17:10:57] 10Phabricator, 06Project-Admins, 07WorkType-Maintenance: New project: "Wikimedia Incident Response" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T929#2508575 (10Danny_B) [17:10:59] 10Phabricator, 06Operations, 06Project-Admins, 06Triagers: Requests for addition to the #acl*Project-Admins group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#2508576 (10Danny_B) [17:11:53] 10Phabricator, 06Multimedia: Migration of Multimedia to Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T827#2508578 (10Danny_B) [17:11:59] 10Phabricator, 06Operations, 06Project-Admins, 06Triagers: Requests for addition to the #acl*Project-Admins group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#1722432 (10Danny_B) [17:13:24] 10Phabricator, 06Project-Admins, 05acl*Project-Admins: Requests for addition to the #acl*Project-Admins group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#2508579 (10Danny_B) p:05High>03Lowest [17:15:27] 10Phabricator, 06Project-Admins: Requests for addition to the #acl*Project-Admins group (in comments) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T706#2508583 (10Aklapper) [17:16:27] andre__: reasoning welcome ^^ [17:17:27] Danny_B, we don't use ACL projects for tracking tasks, except for old "Security" [17:17:43] reasoning for adding also welcome :) [17:18:27] adding is obvious - it is request for access to that group [17:18:59] Danny_B, that group project is not used for tracking any tasks. [17:19:10] as I wrote, we do not use ACL projects for tracking tasks, except for old "Security" [17:19:24] Red ACL projects are not used to associate tasks with them [17:19:27] you asked me for the reason for adding, so i provided that [17:19:43] yeah, that's welcome, and I explained why I removed it again :) [17:20:44] i am not blind, i don't need the same explanation twice [17:21:11] Danny_B, and nobody stated that you are blind, hence no idea why you bring that up... [17:21:24] if my explanation wasn't clear, feel free to explain what I should elaborate. [17:24:39] 19:17:27 < andre__> Danny_B, we don't use ACL projects for tracking tasks, except for old "Security" [17:24:55] 19:17:43 < andre__> reasoning for adding also welcome :) [17:24:55] 19:18:27 < Danny_B> adding is obvious - it is request for access to that group [17:25:04] and that should have been end of this conversation [17:25:19] anyway, wmf-nda is used heavily [17:25:56] T129515 is tagged with acl*project-admins [17:26:24] T129515: Create a Policy Admins project and move all of the acl*various_policy_admins pojects under it as subprojects. - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T129515 [17:26:46] Danny_B: adding an acl to a task because it's a request to join that acl doesn't make sense. Then a request to join WMF-NDA would also have the NDA policy applied? [17:27:38] valhallasw`cloud: they have separate tag wmf-nda-requests [17:27:53] Yes. [17:28:19] plus i don't care. this is totally worthless discussion. i asked for reason. it was provided. enough. [17:30:06] Danny_B: I interpreted your 'and that should have been end of this conversation' as 'I'm right and it's absurd that there needs to be a conversation about this', but I think I misinterpreted it. [17:30:10] Sorry about that. [17:32:32] just agf ;-) i asked for reason. i got it. he asked for reason in exchange. i provided it. there was no need to repeat stuff round and round... ;-) [17:33:11] back to the core topic - that entire task shoud actually be replaced by something more reasonable. [17:33:21] there are basically two possibilities [17:33:57] either conpherence room, or tag (like wmf-nda-request and others) with separate requests as separate tasks [17:35:04] i actually inline more to the latter, since the past has shown that it can take some time if in one single task simply due to overlooking the request. plus the status of various requests can be different in time [17:35:22] while the single task has single status eternally [20:54:48] 10Phabricator, 07Performance: Herald rules causing delays to task edit saves - getting worse - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108586#2508768 (10Zppix) @Quiddity I've disabled my herald rule like requested.