[05:42:44] 06Project-Admins: ESEAP Conference 2018 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T162229#3156192 (10Beeyan) [05:43:44] 06Project-Admins: ESEAP Conference 2018 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T162229#3156204 (10Beeyan) a:03Aklapper Hello, we would like to use Phabricator but for limited user only. Salam, [09:22:06] 06Project-Admins: ESEAP Conference 2018 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T162229#3156691 (10Aklapper) Hi Beeyan, please see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Creating_and_renaming_projects#Creating_new_projects for required information (description, link to more information). By default we don't set... [17:53:44] This is an odd herald rule: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/H226 [17:55:14] Also seems to have clicked some buttons changing the HHVM tag? [17:57:12] Seems we have a confused/testing user. [17:57:34] twentyafterfour: ^? how can I disable personal herald rule for someone else? [17:58:15] RainbowSprinkles: maybe using the cli ... /srv/phab/phabricator/bin/remove destroy [17:58:26] That'll work [18:54:26] twentyafterfour: looks like we got some phame comment spam -- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/phame/post/view/10/labs_openstack_upgrade_on_tuesday_2016-08-02_16_00_utc/ [18:56:24] looks like chase got it [18:56:33] (and disabled the account) [19:56:39] I disabled four more Phabricator accounts using the same IP addresses (one of them also the one of the previous spammer) and deleted two related file uploads [19:57:43] andre__: what's the IP? [19:58:20] chasemp, 196.72.93.241 and 196.90.97.149 [19:58:29] also see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/people/logs/ [21:02:50] twentyafterfour i wonder should we create a project like general-or-unkown and that all tasks that doint have projects added should have that project added. [21:09:56] Surely a TriageMe or something would be more appropriate [21:10:51] paladox: I cant think of anytime i've seen a task without an project unless a person thats new to phab created the task [21:11:15] It happens fairly frequently [21:11:23] Just people often get to them quickly and add tags [21:11:43] Reedy: thats what i mean have you seen a task though that has not ever been added to a tag [21:11:45] so, which begs the question: is it needed? :) [21:12:02] We have andre__bot for telling people to add them [21:12:11] aight [21:12:17] :) [21:12:46] I prefer people to not add General-or-Unknown if they don't know the taxonomy but instead leave it without a project [21:13:15] paladox: also, generally, questions like that (*how* we use Phabricator, what the customs/culture/processes are, etc) should go to andre, not mukunda :) (I mean, mukunda helps/etc, but andre is the keeper of that) :) [21:13:28] oh [21:13:41] sorry [21:14:13] I come up with random arbitrary rules to make everybody's life harder. Mukunda does dirty code work. (That's my understanding so far.) [21:14:29] andre__: ;) [21:15:07] paladox: what is the advantage of having some random project added to a task instead of not having a project added to a task? [21:15:25] It will prevent the task from getting lost into space if someone misses it. [21:15:42] paladox, how? [21:15:46] Andre seems to catch them within 24h [21:15:57] Because you have to know the name of the task to find it. [21:15:58] paladox: no task gets lost as no task gets deleted. [21:16:09] paladox, how does adding a random project help was my question. [21:16:26] you also need to know the name of any other task to find it if it's not in a proper project basket. [21:16:27] paladox: andre is auto subscribe to EVERY task that is created, and if he somehow misses it usually I or mukunda or reedy or someone else gets to it [21:16:44] andre__ oh i forgot your subscribed to every task [21:16:56] if I'm subscribed is irrelevant to my question though :P [21:17:11] andre__: i think he was refering to my comment [21:18:02] What i was going to say is you have to be on phabricator.wm.org all the time to know that there is tasks without projects. [21:18:11] no [21:18:20] Phabricator offers a search functionality. [21:18:31] yes but you need to know what to search for [21:18:34] That's why it's a database where things are saved and not lost. [21:18:39] paladox: for what? [21:18:45] Surely it has a way to search for tasks with no projects [21:18:51] IT DOES. [21:18:51] For tasks that doint have project [21:18:58] there is a search for that. [21:19:03] andre__: Amazing what technology can do, innit? [21:19:35] How can someone search for a task without project? [21:19:38] It's crazy! Before Phabricator I had a printed table on dead trees on my desk with all 76000 bugs listed. But now things are better. [21:19:45] RIP [21:19:54] paladox, by using Maniphest's advanced search and entering "none" in the project field. [21:20:00] oh ok [21:20:01] thanks [21:20:57] (that doesn't work for me) [21:21:15] hmm [21:21:15] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/query/JrajFG9GEREi/ [21:21:20] greg-g ^ [21:21:42] I think I forgot what exactly to enter. Maybe "none" was for the "assignee" field instead [21:22:20] is it this https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/search/query/3QvRjssLfB0r/#R ? [21:22:49] paladox, why would you think so if you looked at your search criteria? [21:23:05] You searched for any tasks. No other search criteria provided. [21:23:06] It looks for all tasks [21:23:15] Yeah. So why did you ask? [21:23:29] See the link I posted above. :) [21:23:30] yep. But i doint think that search from new to old [21:23:51] And I would not use the general search anyway. But Maniphest's advanced search [21:24:00] paladox: i think you can change the sort oder [21:24:05] order rather [21:24:11] in Maniphest's advanced search you can [21:24:31] The general search only offers fields that are shared among any kinds of objects [21:24:33] ah there we go [21:24:33] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/query/uAuN21us.WzP/#R [21:24:59] andre__: ah yeah, "none" brought up a couple random projects :) thanks [21:25:05] whoops