[16:10:44] anu [16:10:50] created 250 pages today [16:10:51] :D [16:11:07] now working to add refereces to all of them [16:12:37] is there a way to add all pages i created into my watch lsit ? [16:12:47] i am adding manually but its too many [16:34:51] ok added all [16:34:54] anup [16:35:12] watch list on WP is different than on wikivoyage [16:35:20] i mean it shows here every edit made to a page [16:35:34] how can i set it so that it only shows last edit to a pag [16:35:40] Aw! [16:35:47] 250 a day? [16:35:52] yes [16:35:54] Are you kidding me? [16:35:57] with in 24 hours [16:36:10] I've not created 250 in my entire my wiki career.. :D [16:36:13] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=250&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Saqib&namespace=&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&year=2015&month=-1 [16:36:56] Awwwwww [16:36:58] but you know all one linter [16:37:00] hahaha [16:37:04] Okay, here it is.. [16:37:06] will develop them . dont worry [16:37:23] You may set all pages you edit or create to automatically added to your watchlist... [16:37:24] hope its fine > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aasiya_Nasir [16:37:34] in "Preferences" section, [16:37:38] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-watchlist [16:37:44] i hve added all pages to watclist [16:38:29] well i was there in the prefernece. coudnt found the option which only show last edit made to a page [16:39:03] They should be named by their last name, however, in rest of the article.. [16:39:13] Last edit? [16:39:18] CLick above link.. [16:39:23] i am there [16:39:41] Tick -- [16:39:42] Add pages and files I edit to my watchlist [16:39:42] Add pages and files I move to my watchlist [16:39:42] Add pages I create and files I upload to my watchlist [16:39:55] Dont you see these options on there? [16:40:11] you not getting me [16:40:47] i am saying that [16:40:56] Um.. what's exact problem? You've to manually add pages to your watchlist? Is it? [16:41:03] my watch list currently showing this : [16:41:13] (diff | hist) . . Iqbal Qadri‎; 15:28 . . (+254)‎ . . ‎Saqib (talk | contribs)‎ [16:41:14] (Page curation log); 15:17 . . Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) tagged Iqbal Qadri with one source tag ‎ [16:41:14] (Page curation log); 15:17 . . Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) marked Iqbal Qadri as reviewed ‎ [16:41:42] is there a way i can only see one last edit made to this "Iqbal Qadri" page ? [16:41:43] And, what do you expect for on there? [16:42:11] looking.. [16:42:14] i mean so that it only shows for [16:42:14] (diff | hist) . . Iqbal Qadri‎; 15:28 . . (+254)‎ . . ‎Saqib (talk | contribs)‎ [16:42:33] otherwise you know 250 pages in my watchlist. it will make things diff for me t.. [16:42:39] Untick this one, --- Expand watchlist to show all changes, not just the most recent [16:43:05] Unticking this one, will only show recent (last) edit to your pages on your watchlist.. [16:43:09] its un tick [16:43:19] untick already [16:44:04] wait. [16:44:06] i think [16:44:26] due to "(Page curation log)".. it wont disable [16:44:55] i got it.. sorry for incovincience [16:45:22] anyways . see this > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aasiya_Nasir&oldid=641873962 [16:45:25] Ugh.. I was editing my preferences.. [16:45:38] i hope this version is somewhat okay > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aasiya_Nasir [16:45:40] :D [16:45:43] gng? [16:45:48] wtf! [16:45:58] gng ? [16:46:35] The article is tagged with "General notability guideline" tag, it is rubbish.. some people enjoy tagging pages making them look ugly.. [16:46:50] hmm [16:46:50] ok [16:46:53] MPs are not required to meet GNG standard, they are notable per [[WP:NPOLITICIAN]]. [16:46:59] oh ok [16:47:00] great [16:47:05] thanks for letting me know of it [16:47:20] An elected member is always notable... [16:47:32] Tags look ugly on top of articles... [16:47:32] these are memner of national assembly [16:47:36] hmm [16:47:42] Yes, they are all auto-notable.. [16:47:49] 80% pages were missing [16:48:00] i have created all of them.. hope will develop them one by one [16:48:09] Did you use some script? [16:48:11] no [16:48:15] manually [16:48:17] was pain [16:48:19] but fun too [16:48:37] Why didnt you create a demo version and replaced names with subject one.. [16:48:52] @link [[User:Anupmehra/Demo]] [16:48:52] http://enwp.org/User:Anupmehra/Demo [16:48:52] yes i did like ths [16:48:57] For indian villages.. [16:49:00] :D [16:49:05] actually no.. [16:49:10] that was not possible [16:49:23] well this is funny [16:49:27] your demp [16:49:27] It is... [16:49:33] see for example [16:49:34] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iqbal_Qadri [16:49:48] i had to change "ticket of Muttahida Qaumi Movement from NA-241 (Karachi" [16:49:56] I gave my demo to people I find interested in creating articles on populated places.. [16:50:05] hmm [16:50:22] i had to change CATs [16:50:43] Yes, you've there only to change, the Name, Party Name, Constituency, -may be Year of election. That's it. [16:51:09] CATs? There are tons of people handling AWB on new pages, they'll add cats for you. :D [16:51:29] hmm.. [16:51:34] anyways it done :) [16:51:54] Or you should get AWB permission.. and run it on your watchlist..... [16:52:48] btw can you please check or give me link of indian mps list [16:53:05] i am talking about national level parlament [16:53:10] lok subha [16:53:12] A link of Indian MPs? [16:53:18] yes [16:53:21] On Wiki or Off Wiki? [16:53:33] I may get both.. [16:53:35] :D [16:53:39] offc on wiki [16:53:44] let me C how many of them have pages [16:54:00] I think, many of them have.. [16:54:21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_Lok_Sabha [16:54:26] whats the page name ? [16:54:48] got https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_16th_Lok_Sabha [16:54:56] I think, it's a category, [16:55:25] this page looks good [16:55:36] can you please help me and make our page look like this one too [16:55:40] will take few mins only [16:56:18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Members_of_the_Lok_Sabha [16:56:42] heres the list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_16th_Lok_Sabha [16:56:45] There's 1st to 16th category-wise list of mps.. [16:56:50] yes [16:57:07] Okay, what to do with that page? [16:57:21] party colours only [16:57:47] What do you people call, "Lok Sabha" there? [16:57:55] Peoples Assembly [16:58:09] no [16:58:25] our media refer the same "lok sabha" [16:58:33] or sometime parliament [16:58:47] A link to yours page? [16:59:15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pakistan_National_Assembly_seats [17:00:42] our parties have 2 colour each [17:00:48] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_Tehreek-e-Insaf [17:00:54] greed and red [17:00:58] of this PTO [17:01:34] and that too dark colour [17:02:08] I think, you may decide what color to assign them on wiki.. may be their official or something of your choice based on community consensus.. [17:02:48] You may choose one that'd also be unique for each politicial party,, [17:02:53] ok [17:03:15] However, having their official colors make thing easy.. [17:03:34] ok [17:03:54] In cases, many politicial parties share a color or have too-similar color.. we need to assign our own.. to make things easily readable and differentiable.. [17:04:12] hmm [17:04:37] hmm [17:04:48] PTI red color too dark [17:04:57] will make invisible the text [17:05:13] anyways lets work on it later [17:06:17] I think, one needs to first to decide what color have to assign what party... [17:06:30] Have you got a list of colors for all politicial parties? [17:06:42] yes [17:06:48] thats why decided to leave it for a while [17:06:51] will work on it later [17:07:06] will ask sm pakis to work on it [17:07:16] i mean about the colour [17:07:43] Why not initiate a thread on "WT:WikiProject Pakistan"? [17:08:21] sure.. will do it [17:08:59] Ask editors suggestion on WikiProject talk page, there should be more participation and that could also be cited as consensus in cases if in future someone comes from party and challenges color for their party.. show them community consensus.. [17:09:20] hmm ok [17:10:19] since morning .watching CNN [17:10:30] Paris [17:10:35] and they report on paris [17:10:45] not going to take a break for a sec [17:10:53] M still watching.. [17:10:59] i am not understandign what they saying [17:11:01] they are looking for lady terrorist missing... [17:11:15] but …. enjoying their reporting.. [17:11:19] yes [17:11:35] She looks cool.. how could she be a terrorist? :D [17:12:24] Appearances indeed are deceiving..