[16:11:59] <hashar>	 so no browser test / ci meeting this week.  Vacations ongoing
[19:39:04] <rfarrand>	 this talk starts in 20 min
[19:39:13] <rfarrand>	 link to follow along in topic
[19:55:06] <rfarrand>	 this talk starts in about 5 min
[20:01:42] <rfarrand>	 we will be starting in just a moment
[20:01:45] <rfarrand>	 the stream has not started yet
[20:02:31] <robla>	 rfarrand: is it possible to join the live version of this at this point?
[20:02:46] <Negative24>	 robla: youtube or hangouts?
[20:02:54] <robla>	 hangout
[20:04:12] <guillom>	 robla: hangout is live so you should be able to join.
[20:04:23] <guillom>	 The broadcast to youtube however isn't live yet.
[20:04:47] <robla>	 guillom: could you PM the link to me?
[20:05:16] <guillom>	 I don't have a link to the hangout. brendan_campbell probably does.
[20:05:20] <rfarrand>	 it is in the topic
[20:05:28] <rfarrand>	 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPLA3ktaSbo
[20:05:34] <robla>	 rfarrand: Hangout link?
[20:05:54] <guillom>	 robla wants to join the party, not just watch :)
[20:06:19] <rfarrand>	 we just went live
[20:06:24] <brendan_campbell>	 we have about 10ish slots, one sec...
[20:06:43] <rfarrand>	 make sure to join muted if you join :)
[20:07:03] <rfarrand>	 anyone watching live, can you let us know when the stream works?
[20:07:08] <Negative24>	 you guys have a nice office :)
[20:07:15] <Negative24>	 rfarrand: its working
[20:07:20] * robla still doesn't have the hangout link
[20:07:44] <brendan_campbell>	 @rfarrand is about to send the link
[20:08:03] <brendan_campbell>	 excuse me... rfarrand will send it (so used to slack)
[20:09:36] <rfarrand>	 if anyone has questions let me know Matan does not mind being interrupted
[20:11:31] <rfarrand>	 you will see a blank screen for a second but it will get fixed
[20:11:33] <Negative24>	 Its when he goes fullscreen
[20:12:21] <guillom>	 We're still not seeing the right thing, correct?
[20:12:55] <Negative24>	 I'm not. I think his presentation is presenting on a different screen which hangouts isn't seeing
[20:13:37] <rfarrand>	 working on it
[20:13:40] <guillom>	 Yeah we're stuck on slide #4 in another window :)
[20:14:09] <quiddity>	 still can't see anything, just his profile picture, rfarrand
[20:14:09] <quiddity>	 (I agree it's probably when he goes fullscreen)
[20:14:11] <quiddity>	 brendan_campbell, ^
[20:14:20] <Negative24>	 It works now on YT
[20:14:29] <guillom>	 Awesome :D Thanks!
[20:14:29] <Negative24>	 (path of protest)
[20:15:05] <rfarrand>	 ok, its working as it should now
[20:15:09] <quiddity>	 ty!
[20:17:46] <Negative24>	 what application is he using? (not necessarily a question that should be asked right now :P)
[20:18:05] <guillom>	 link: http://www.iflscience.com/environment/short-animation-puts-time-span-earth-perspective
[20:18:42] <robla>	 we're not seeing what he's showing again....
[20:18:50] <robla>	 oh...here it is
[20:20:56] <guillom>	 Seeing the "making of" of this project is incredibly interesting.
[20:24:41] <rfarrand>	 Negative24: I can ask that whenever you like. We could wait until the end if you want :)
[20:27:06] <guillom>	 The parallel of zooming in/zooming out in maps is interesting. Maybe a question for later: did he consider using a logarithmic scale to get around the issue of most data being in the 'last dot" of the line?
[20:27:37] <rfarrand>	 since you are here you can ask at the mic stand guillom ;) if you don't want to - I can too
[20:27:59] <guillom>	 A non-log scale is of course more intuitive for many people.
[20:28:07] <guillom>	 rfarrand: Maybe I'll do that :)
[20:29:25] <robla>	 guillom: please do ask the log scale question  :-)
[20:34:02] <guillom>	 robla: after playing with the tool, I think he does use one already, or some version of it
[20:35:00] <guillom>	 Because the middle of the scale is ~11,000 years; so definitely not -7 billion years :)
[20:36:05] <guillom>	 He's addressing that now.
[20:36:39] <guillom>	 So instead of using a log scale, the sensitivity of the slder changes over time.
[20:36:43] <guillom>	 slider*
[20:39:34] <rfarrand>	 questions?
[20:40:40] <robla>	 I'd like to know how the simple categorization is handled.  how is "music" derived from the wikipedia article data?
[20:40:48] * robla can ask on hangout
[20:41:33] <rfarrand>	 Negative24: do you want me to ask about the application?
[20:42:18] <rfarrand>	 last chance for questions :)
[20:49:23] <subbu|lunch>	 that is interesting how he derived that taxonomy info.
[20:55:15] <guillom>	 rfarrand: This was great. Thank you for organizing!
[20:55:25] <rfarrand>	 glad it worked out :)
[21:08:00] <Negative24>	 rfarrand: sorry I stepped out for a bit. I'm going to rewatch it now but thanks anyways.