[18:57:51] good evening/morning pacific time [19:12:53] (Ongoing CREDIT showcase: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxjSQ0TGXsw [19:12:57] ) [19:13:18] Responisive design Q: enhancements like these have been designed and prototyped before, and most of them seem like really straightforward improvements that don't have much downside. Why don't we have any of these things already? [19:14:03] personal opinion, because from here we have to go into a design by comittee stage with the affected sites (all of them) [19:14:50] Showcase notes/schedule: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/CREDIT [19:16:16] (mn is Mongolian, btw) [19:16:17] thedj: I love the responsive improvements. I actually have something like that (but much less sophisticated) running in my personal user CSS: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn/global.css [19:20:04] and I think ebernhardson is right about why we've never deployed something like that. I was actually inspired by a right-rail design that was briefly tried as part of the typography refresh beta feature, but it caused so much confusion among beta testers (because nobody expected that change from a typography beta feature) that it was quickly rolled back. [19:21:28] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Typography_refresh#Why_are_we_using_serif_fonts_for_the_headings.3F [19:26:06] this offline thing is awesome, I wonder if it's possible to control which articles are downloaded [19:27:28] SMalyshev: I'm envisioning that we provide a number of predefined collections, varying by size, or by use case. [19:27:53] yeah offline is awesom [19:27:53] e.g. all medical articles [19:28:32] neilpquinn: steal way from my .css :) [19:31:35] have a nice day !