[15:56:36] Hallo [15:58:10] thank you, @foks [16:02:02] mcruz is this the chan for questions? [16:02:09] yes, it is [16:02:54] kewl [16:15:05] Did the survey have a non-binary gender option? [16:15:42] good question [16:16:00] thanks for the question, we are going to address it at the end of the presentation [16:16:09] Thanks :-) [16:16:29] interestingly/disappointingly, 16% is exactly what Hill and Shaw estimated from the 2008 data. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065782 [16:16:44] Can you please explain in few words what do you mean in "Affiliates" - are there people from CC for example? [16:16:46] so we may have gone exactly… nowhere in the past decade [16:17:53] by affiliates, we mean Wikimedia movement affiliates. There are currently 3 active affiliate models: user group, chapters and thematic organizations [16:17:54] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_movement_affiliates [16:19:06] Oh. OK. Understood. Thanks. [16:19:07] last two comments were in response to Ldorfman [16:30:34] you can find the report here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights/2016-17_Report [16:30:55] that is what Edward was showing just now [16:32:03] I see now that 1% identified as a non-binary gender, so good that there was an option for that [16:33:58] Thanks for being inclusive of non-binary folks like myself :-) [16:33:59] TL;DR: the gender gap does not appear to have changed [16:35:44] :( [16:36:24] what is interesting is that, while it hasn't changed for the audience group "editors", we observe there are more women in leadership positions, like program leaders, and affiliates [16:37:06] (two other audience groups that were included in the survey) [16:37:11] that is cool to hear [16:37:32] mcruz: I think there are questions in the Hangout chat as well [16:38:10] mcruz: You already covered it, sorry! [16:38:11] yes, I am following that, and Youtube [16:38:16] cool! [16:38:24] any other questions here? [16:38:58] I heard it mentioned that CentralNotice couldn't do proper random sampling. I was not in any of those conversations. Depending on what you wanted to measure, you can get representative samples of specific populations. I would like to help anyone interested in this in the future. [16:39:48] that would be really helpful, dstrine Thank you for the offer! can you email eval@wikimedia.org, so we can contact you later? [16:39:56] I just noticed that that scatter plot starts at "somewhat satisfied", I misread it the first time [16:40:08] mcruz: sure [16:40:20] thank you! [16:43:59] Thank you [16:44:19] thank you all for joining! [16:58:24] Wow, someone put in a lot of work to make that report wiki-friendly. Looks really nice. [17:02:14] tgr: yes, really. looks great. [17:04:46] Just for the logs, that meeting link again is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoXpL-OUdNU [17:05:00] I imagine it'll be an accessible video after the fact :)