[00:01:44] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS3) 10Legoktm: SpaceyParenthesisSniff: Don't remove last argument or array element [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/288043 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134857) (owner: 10PleaseStand)
[00:03:02] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer: Adapt MW-CS test framework to support testing sniffs that support auto-fixing (phpcbf) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108458#2335818 (10Legoktm) a:03EBernhardson Fixed in {80210fe43e1defc01745871dff9bb1bf3b1c1a9a}.
[00:03:17] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer: Adapt MW-CS test framework to support testing sniffs that support auto-fixing (phpcbf) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108458#2335821 (10Legoktm) 05Open>03Resolved
[00:06:11] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10Legoktm: [C: 032] "PS3: Added and updated now-failing tests." [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/288043 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134857) (owner: 10PleaseStand)
[00:07:50] <grrrit-wm>	 (03Merged) 10jenkins-bot: SpaceyParenthesisSniff: Don't remove last argument or array element [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/288043 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134857) (owner: 10PleaseStand)
[00:41:50] <James_F>	 legoktm: Worth doing a new release just for SpaceyParenthesisSniff? I'd lean towards yes.
[00:42:14] <legoktm>	 Yes, but first I'm writing a script to identify repos that were potentially broken
[01:06:42] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer, 13Patch-For-Review: phpcbf: MediaWiki_Sniffs_WhiteSpace_SpaceyParenthesisSniff removes array elements - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134857#2335903 (10Legoktm) I wrote a script to identify extensions that would have been affected by the SpaceyParenthesisSniff bug. The only extens...
[01:07:01] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer, 13Patch-For-Review: phpcbf: MediaWiki_Sniffs_WhiteSpace_SpaceyParenthesisSniff removes array elements - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134857#2335904 (10Legoktm) 05Open>03Resolved a:03PleaseStand
[01:08:11] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[01:08:12] <wmf-insecte>	 Project mediawiki-core-code-coverage build #2041: 09FIXED in 3 hr 25 min: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/mediawiki-core-code-coverage/2041/
[01:09:10] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS1) 10Legoktm: Release 0.7.2 [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291389 
[01:11:15] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10Legoktm: [C: 032] Release 0.7.2 [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291389 (owner: 10Legoktm)
[01:12:19] <grrrit-wm>	 (03Merged) 10jenkins-bot: Release 0.7.2 [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291389 (owner: 10Legoktm)
[02:18:17] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[02:18:18] <wmf-insecte>	 Project selenium-QuickSurveys » chrome,beta,Linux,contintLabsSlave && UbuntuTrusty build #37: 09FIXED in 5 min 16 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/selenium-QuickSurveys/BROWSER=chrome,MEDIAWIKI_ENVIRONMENT=beta,PLATFORM=Linux,label=contintLabsSlave%20&&%20UbuntuTrusty/37/
[02:20:06] <wmf-insecte>	 Project beta-update-databases-eqiad build #8839: 04FAILURE in 6 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-update-databases-eqiad/8839/
[02:25:20] <legoktm>	 > Database is read-only: The database has been automatically locked while the slave database servers catch up to the master.
[02:33:46] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer, 05Google-Summer-of-Code-2016: Improving an static analysis tools for MediaWiki - Weekly reports - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134225#2335932 (10Lethexie)
[03:20:36] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[03:20:37] <wmf-insecte>	 Project beta-update-databases-eqiad build #8840: 09FIXED in 35 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-update-databases-eqiad/8840/
[04:05:27] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[04:05:27] <wmf-insecte>	 Project selenium-MultimediaViewer » safari,beta,OS X 10.9,contintLabsSlave && UbuntuTrusty build #28: 09FIXED in 9 min 26 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/selenium-MultimediaViewer/BROWSER=safari,MEDIAWIKI_ENVIRONMENT=beta,PLATFORM=OS%20X%2010.9,label=contintLabsSlave%20&&%20UbuntuTrusty/28/
[04:18:18] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[04:18:19] <wmf-insecte>	 Project selenium-MultimediaViewer » firefox,beta,Linux,contintLabsSlave && UbuntuTrusty build #28: 09FIXED in 22 min: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/selenium-MultimediaViewer/BROWSER=firefox,MEDIAWIKI_ENVIRONMENT=beta,PLATFORM=Linux,label=contintLabsSlave%20&&%20UbuntuTrusty/28/
[04:43:55] <ori>	 !log depooling integration-slave-trusty-1015 to profile phpunit runs
[04:43:58] <qa-morebots>	 Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Release_Engineering/SAL, Master
[05:20:33] <wmf-insecte>	 Project beta-update-databases-eqiad build #8842: 04FAILURE in 32 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-update-databases-eqiad/8842/
[06:20:27] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer, 05Google-Summer-of-Code-2016: All new methods should document their parameters and return values - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136464#2336015 (10Lethexie)
[06:20:36] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[06:20:37] <wmf-insecte>	 Project beta-update-databases-eqiad build #8843: 09FIXED in 36 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/beta-update-databases-eqiad/8843/
[06:30:12] <wikibugs>	 10MediaWiki-Codesniffer, 05Google-Summer-of-Code-2016: All new methods should document their parameters and return values - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136464#2336033 (10Lethexie)
[07:12:03] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS1) 10Lethexie: Add function commenting sniff. [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291489 
[08:59:13] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10Wikimedia-General-or-Unknown: lrcwiki stats are wrong - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T109635#2336054 (10Mjbmr) I actually fixed that long time ago, when no one paid attention, by running null edits all over the wiki, thanks anyways for running that command after 10 months whe...
[10:32:01] <wikibugs>	 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure, 10Tidy: HTML Tags are stripped from extension output - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68516#2336172 (10Danny_B)
[10:50:32] <wikibugs>	 10Beta-Cluster-Infrastructure, 10Tidy: HTML Tags are stripped from extension output - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68516#2336291 (10Danny_B)
[12:12:32] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10Paladox: "recheck" [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291489 (owner: 10Lethexie)
[12:15:41] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10jenkins-bot: [V: 04-1] Add function commenting sniff. [tools/codesniffer] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291489 (owner: 10Lethexie)
[12:27:20] <paladox>	 legoktm: Hi
[12:32:20] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS1) 10Paladox: Migrate mw-tools-codesniffer-mwcore-testrun to trusty nodepool [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291501 
[12:32:39] <paladox>	 legoktm ^^ :)
[12:33:42] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10Paladox: "Theres a bit of duplicating which I will clean up if this test passes." [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291501 (owner: 10Paladox)
[12:35:23] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS2) 10Paladox: Update phabricator/* tests [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291283 
[12:35:50] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10Paladox: "Needs re c+2 please since it needed a rebase." [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291283 (owner: 10Paladox)
[13:25:39] <jzerebecki>	 From https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/integration/jenkins-job-builder + 816e1c1...cd63874 master     -> origin/master  (forced update)
[13:26:20] <jzerebecki>	 *sigh*
[13:30:26] <paladox>	 jzerebecki: I think that project was deleted ^^
[13:30:58] <paladox>	 mutante found a gerrit link and we were wondering why we were blocked from viewing it yesturday and found it was that and that project was deleted.
[13:32:17] <jzerebecki>	 paladox: no it is still there, the above is a git url not consumable by a browser. For the later see https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/integration/jenkins-job-builder
[13:35:10] <paladox>	 jzerebecki: Sorry i got conffused wrong one
[13:35:14] <paladox>	 its https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/CIJC/manage/basics/
[13:36:15] <jzerebecki>	 paladox: yes that was merged into integration/config.git
[13:36:23] <paladox>	 oh ok
[13:47:51] <grrrit-wm>	 (03CR) 10JanZerebecki: "See phabricator ticket for response." [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/290822 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136176) (owner: 10Jdlrobson)
[13:48:31] <wmf-insecte>	 Yippee, build fixed!
[13:48:32] <wmf-insecte>	 Project selenium-VisualEditor » firefox,beta,Linux,contintLabsSlave && UbuntuTrusty build #34: 09FIXED in 4 min 31 sec: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/selenium-VisualEditor/BROWSER=firefox,MEDIAWIKI_ENVIRONMENT=beta,PLATFORM=Linux,label=contintLabsSlave%20&&%20UbuntuTrusty/34/
[13:53:41] <paladox>	 jzerebecki: Hi could you review https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/291501/ and https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/288819/ and https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/290791/ please
[14:03:37] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS1) 10Paladox: Migrate composer-validate to trusty nodepool [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291505 
[14:06:11] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS2) 10Paladox: Migrate composer-validate to trusty nodepool [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291505 
[14:12:37] <grrrit-wm>	 (03PS1) 10Paladox: Migrate composer-package-validate to trusty nodepool [integration/config] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/291506 
[15:42:14] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336704 (10matmarex) Are the contents of the release really wrong, or is the version number wrong?
[15:42:42] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10MediaWiki-General-or-Unknown, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336706 (10matmarex)
[15:47:09] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10MediaWiki-General-or-Unknown, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336708 (10WayneSallee) I don't know if it is really wrong, but every single file that I saw that stated the version said 13 with no mention of 14.  Wayne Salle...
[16:08:10] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10MediaWiki-General-or-Unknown, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336722 (10Danny_B) p:05Triage>03High
[21:43:00] <wikibugs>	 03Scap3, 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service: Scap3 checks should not be random - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136253#2337078 (10Ladsgroup) @thcipriani: What do you think of [[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5121931/in-python-how-can-you-load-yaml-mappings-as-ordereddicts/21912744#21912744 | this solution]]?
[22:16:35] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10MediaWiki-General-or-Unknown, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336690 (10Legoktm) The version numbers are wrong per <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2016-May/085687.html>
[23:08:23] <wikibugs>	 06Release-Engineering-Team, 10MediaWiki-General-or-Unknown, 05MW-1.23-release: 1.23.14 is really 1.23.13 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136484#2336690 (10Ciencia_Al_Poder) Looks like it happened also for 1.26 and fixed without releasing a new version: [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:T4i9jjg8asq...
[23:27:35] <wikibugs>	 05Gerrit-Migration, 10Diffusion, 10GitHub-Mirrors, 06Repository-Admins: Have Phabricator take over replication to Github - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T115624#2337159 (10Paladox) @demon and @mmodell I contacted GitHub and they said yes they do have a limited they didn't say what the limit is only tha...
[23:42:11] <wikibugs>	 10Continuous-Integration-Infrastructure, 06Release-Engineering-Team, 06Operations, 10Ops-Access-Requests: Allow RelEng  access to labnet servers (was: Allow RelEng nova log access) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133992#2337167 (10Paladox)
[23:50:12] <wikibugs>	 10Continuous-Integration-Infrastructure, 06Release-Engineering-Team: doc.wikimedia.org should be running PHP 5.5+, not 5.3 -> demos etc. don't work - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T127504#2337168 (10Paladox) >>! In T127504#2159391, @Aklapper wrote: > If that was a question (not sure as no question mark at...