[01:11:45] Oh, thanks; will read tomorrow [18:25:13] halfak: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=10547237 [18:26:08] +1 good suggestions. I agree that having an optional "notes" field is a great idea. [18:26:20] I considered the auto-submit, but I was worried that mis-clicks might get recorded. [18:26:53] add an "undo" for a few seconds? [18:26:56] One thing we can do is provide keyboard bindings so that users won't even have to lift up their hands in order to categorize a revision. [18:27:18] yeah! that is certainly useful [18:27:29] Magnus does that for Wikidata Game [18:28:11] as for the undo button, there are a few comments related to the Game here: [18:28:11] https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/wikidata-game/issue/29/add-an-undo-button [18:52:32] added to the list ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=10547470 ) [18:59:02] Helder, I agree. The ability to go back is going to be critical. [18:59:25] In my mocks, I imagined that once could simply use the progress bar itself to go back to past "codings" [19:00:17] Note the highlighted rectangle with a tooltip here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Revision_handcoder_%28mock%29.svg [19:00:38] hmm... that could work :-) [19:00:57] another idea: "Better integration with existing workflows: [19:00:57] If the revision under review is the most recent version of the article, and the user marks it as "damaging", revert the edit" [19:01:01] https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=10547542 [19:01:18] That's going to be extremely unlikely. [19:01:31] Most edits that will ever get reverted are reverted in about 30 seconds. [19:01:52] Also, feature creep. Just click the [undo] link :P [19:03:17] indeed [19:04:56] halfak: what about changing the color of the vertical bars in the progress bar, to reflect the status of the revision? [19:05:11] E.g.: damaging = red; not damaging = gren [19:05:13] *green [19:06:26] Sounds good. But what about the "good faithiness"? [19:06:29] Two colors. [19:06:32] Maybe four? [19:07:20] red = damaging & bad-faith, yellow = damaging & good faith, green = not damaging and good faith [19:07:32] What color would we make not damaging & bad-faith? [19:07:56] What's the most confused color? [19:07:58] lol [19:08:15] * halfak tries to envision a non-damaging bad-faith edit. [19:09:21] non-damaging bad-faith edit = vandal fail [19:09:35] heh [19:09:46] I've got to run. I'll be back on in ~ 5 hours [19:09:48] maybe use up and down squares for each revision instead of a single rectangle [19:09:48] o/ [19:10:01] each of them with the red/green color for one feature [19:10:11] (this could generalize for N-features) [19:15:16] I think I won't be here then, so we continue the talk another day...