[19:36:06] halfak: I spy you and dario on a meeting called the case for labs :) [19:36:48] :) o/ YuviPanda just got done [19:36:55] halfak: :) [19:36:59] Trying to Carry the torch. [19:37:08] let me know if there’s anything I can do to help :) [19:37:11] now to give you accounts [19:37:16] I'm consolidating notes from Dario & J-Mo now. [19:37:20] w00t [19:37:43] Once we've got that together, I think that we should get into a meeting to discuss how we're going to "pitch" this and when. [19:37:47] yeah [19:37:49] also for what. [19:38:31] +1. [19:38:35] What resources and when. [19:42:06] halfak: yeah [19:42:47] halfak: see PM for postgres [19:47:55] o/ J-Mo [19:48:06] Did you have a chance to look at the "Business case for labs" doc? [19:56:50] oh! right. let me do that now, halfak… ;) [19:58:10] Thanks dude. [19:58:19] See notes here as well: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/toollabs-impact [19:58:22] J-Mo, ^ [20:01:28] halfak: can I haz too? [20:06:22] YuviPanda, can you haz wut? [20:06:43] halfak, YuviPanda, I put in a bullet under "services" about how essential labs tools are for programmatic work. otherwise, looks great right now. You might want to start thinking about what the "ask" is. More people? Shiny new servers? Time/budget for a major re-infrastructuring project? My hunch is that Execs will understand the value of labs (in an abstract way anyway), but they'll immediately want to know what this sensible plan will cost them [20:06:52] halfak: ‘business case for labs’ doc [20:07:08] YuviPanda, same one we looked at together. :) [20:07:15] That you shared with me [20:07:18] halfak: aah ok :) [21:03:34] test [23:01:44] * halfak flies away on a bicycle [23:01:47] back in ~ an hour