[16:03:09] Heh; tried to use a random revid number to test ORES and I got an error. Now I know how I need to handle errors :) [16:05:38] guillom boo [16:05:43] dont make ores server kitties weep [16:05:51] http://ores.wmflabs.org/scores/enwiki/?revids=344258&models=reverted [16:06:07] it is a problem ATM if the revision is deleted [16:06:35] and your random rev is 344258 :p [16:06:58] heh [16:07:35] Oh, is it because it's the first revision of the page? [16:07:36] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=344258 <- first edit to article so diff cant find a prior verison I suspect [16:07:42] Yeah. [16:07:43] well. That is what I said. :p [16:07:53] the two conditions are known to us. [16:08:27] Thanks to you I know a little about Bindarri National Park [16:08:29] Sure; I didn't mean that it was an error with ORES; I meant that it was an error I needed to account for in my client. [16:08:36] héhé [16:22:19] Is x-tools ever not broken? [16:23:06] "The new xTools environment is being set up now. We estimate uptime in about 1 week." <-- A time estimate without a reference point. Argh. [16:45:05] guillom: do check in a week to see if they made any progress :) [16:45:43] heh [16:46:36] I wish I could take a sabbatical, do hackerscool and then spend 3 months building tools [16:46:42] Stupid visas [16:53:17] morning, folks [17:02:49] YuviPanda|brb: Why would you need to do hackschool? [17:03:01] guillom: I want to! [17:03:13] Oh; but you don't /need/ to, right? [17:03:27] Probably not, depends on how you define need :) [17:03:33] heh [17:43:29] harej: Are you the one who was concerned about the fact that user_touched "resets when a user is left a talkpage message"? [17:43:34] yes [17:43:51] but it was moot because i didn't have access to that information anyway [17:44:21] I wonder if anyone has reported that as a bug. [17:44:32] I don't understand the rationale for that behavior. [17:45:45] is it a bug if it's a documented behavior? [17:46:18] Ok, let's call it a request for a feature change, then :p [18:28:45] DarTar: FYI: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Active_editor_spike_2015_(July_update) [18:29:00] w00t [18:29:18] oh I thought it was done already :) [18:29:41] :P [18:29:45] thanks, I’ll send out the note to Lila / Katherine in a sec [18:30:52] * guillom watchlists. [18:32:23] Wait, did we figure out what the spike was about? [18:32:29] Couldn't have been Art+Feminism because that was in March. [18:33:24] harej, lots of hypotheses, nothing conclusive I know about yet [18:33:26] harej, we’re updating the early analyses and opening up the question of digging into these trends to the community [18:45:56] halfak: if you want another demo, I just finished skinning WikiProject Ghana: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ghana/New [18:46:28] MySpaceTom, ಠ_ಠ [18:47:15] I don't remember "category" being one of the predicted classes. [18:47:17] ;) [18:49:23] It's correct, is it not? [18:49:32] Sure. :) [18:52:44] assessment.py, the script that generates the report, treats categories and articles differently. [18:52:59] articles are fed through ORES, categories are sorted as categories. [18:54:08] see: https://github.com/harej/wikiproject_scripts/blob/master/assessment.py#L162 [18:54:24] Makes sense. [22:34:28] hey guillom, can we talk at 5.30 about the active editor data Lila requested? [22:35:34] DarTar: I have no idea what that request is. I usually leave the office around 4 but I can stay if it's urgent. [22:36:33] it’s a bit urgent since we’re coordinating work with Aaron that needs to wrap up by the end of the week, if you can stay it’d be appreciated (I can also call you later if you prefer) [22:37:04] DarTar: No problem. I'll be there. [22:37:18] thanks [22:37:21] sure