[18:35:17] hey people, we’re hosting our showcase, I’ll be taking and relaying questions here [18:40:11] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZgqzVuRDRs for reference. :-) [18:41:17] thx quiddity :) [18:41:25] and hi! [18:58:21] That's a really interesting plot [18:58:33] (The % warned/blocked for personal attacks) [19:00:28] Is there a reason for the sharp spike at ~750 revisions on the Cumulative percentage of attacks by number of revisions slide? [19:00:39] I’ll relay that [19:00:42] thx [19:00:44] Thanks :) [19:02:57] Ha, wouldn't have guessed! [19:29:25] any question for Daisy? ping me here [19:32:23] > Were the 5 people in the dataset native english speakers? [19:34:14] jgirault: I’ll relay the q [19:36:11] jgirault: that should answer your q :) [19:39:26] > They answered how they reach the portal page. It seems they also said they use it quite frequently. But they also say they all use a search engine and add "wiki" to their query... They said they use wiki search for "exact terms"... Does it mean they would prefer the portal page over google to query specific words or technical terms? [19:40:59] > In other words, what make them move to the portal page for a query? [19:46:56] Something that I am catching from the research is "Sometimes they will use a search engine first, for specific words or technical terms that they feel might not exist on Wikipedia". [19:48:05] jgirault: daisy is not on IRC but you two should follow up offline :) [19:49:16] "they feel might not exist"... it seems there is an opportunity there, to make people feel Wikipedia has the answer, it seems Wikipedia (and also its sister projects) has more knowledge than people think. [19:50:31] let me rephrase that: it seems people think Wikipedia contains less knowledge than it actually does.