[03:47:48] hey bearloga. Are you around? [05:14:47] lzia: ish? I use IRCCloud so kinda but not really? :) [05:15:15] :D ok, i say something for when you have time for it. [05:15:52] I'm looking for some basic code that can get me started with counting queries per second (in search) and I thought you may have looked at this or similar problems before, bearloga. If you have any code you can point me to, I'd appreciate it. [05:16:37] if you also know how much search traffic we have, bearloga, please let me know. [05:20:56] lzia: Oh totally! Yeah, I'll take a look and email you some stuff tomorrow morning. The data is in https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Analytics/Data_Lake/Traffic/Cirrus#Current_schema [05:22:02] sounds good, bearloga. thanks! (I did go over the schema, and am playing with the data, but I have a few questions that I think looking at a working code can help. may bug you beyond just the code as well. thanks!;) [05:22:09] have a good night bearloga. [05:22:21] Oh! I can link you to working code [05:23:55] \o/ [05:24:44] lzia: https://github.com/wikimedia/wikimedia-discovery-golden/blob/master/modules/metrics/search/cirrus_aggregates.R#L24--L77 [05:25:12] ok, this keeps me busy for a bit, bearloga. ;) [05:26:27] :D I hope it helps! Email me if you have questions :) have a good night too! [14:12:44] o/ [16:03:44] 10Quarry: Quarry should remember my login - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T164390#3231927 (10Dvorapa) [16:59:59] halfak: Do you have a preference on how we approach additional WikiProjects? Should I gather data and build a model and go “hey, here’s this model we think you might find useful”, or should I go “we’d like to add you to this project” first? (but gather data and build the model anyway) [17:00:43] Nettrom, I like the former. [17:00:58] I don't think you're doing anything disruptive enough to have to ask permission first. [17:01:14] Also, I saw your summary table of how importance is implemented and drooled a little bit. [17:01:17] Nice work :) [17:01:55] halfak: yeah, I have a preference for that too, building everything and saying “here, you can use this if you like” seems more impactful than saying “we’re thinking about doing X” [17:02:36] Thanks! I wasn’t 100% sure it was worth doing while I was working on it on Friday, but once I sat down with it on Monday and analyzed it the trends became clear and very meaningful [17:02:36] +1 [17:02:45] I'm heading out to lunch. [17:02:49] back in 20 mins or so [17:02:50] cool, enjoy food! [17:03:44] For when you get back: I found it really useful to see that several projects have this description of what the “average reader of Wikipedia is likely to look up” as an argument for labelling importance, since it maps so clearly to article views [18:10:38] Lunch conversation was fun :) [18:10:59] +1 for considering the reader. That's a good arguement. [21:18:41] bearloga: thanks for the email. Going over it and will get back to you there. [23:07:41] hey Nettrom, do you have bandwidth for another CSCW review? [23:07:57] J-Mo: if you’re the one asking, yes :) [23:08:00] feel free to say 'no way' if that's what your heart tells you [23:08:08] \o/ [23:08:17] thank you sire, robo email inbound [23:08:33] \o/ [23:13:31] J-Mo: {{accepted}} [23:13:51] for half a second I was writing {{done}}, but that’s a bit premature [23:14:32] hey, the sooner the better (kidding). Thank you!