[16:09:30] sgoel: good morning. I will respond to your email about namespaces in 1.5 hour. [16:10:56] sounds good! [17:07:42] neilpquinn: hi. do you have a working definition for when an editor is considered to have left a project altogether? [17:09:09] neilpquinn: I'm asking since sgoel is looking at the impact of thanks on people staying or leaving, or perhaps the frequency of edits, and we need to consider inactivity (I guess across all namespaces in a project) for n days/months/etc. as the proxy for editor leaving the system. [17:09:16] system -> that specific project. [17:12:58] bmansurov: can you produce a report of translation labels we've received? This can be helpful for Trizek (and the rest of us;). [17:13:02] * leila anxiously waits. ;) [17:18:53] halfak: my team ;) wants to set up a Research+Scoring Platform hang time with your team. Would you all be interested? Context: our work is closely related and we want to make sure we have a monthly time allocated to dig deeper with your team. [17:30:47] 10Quarry: Query Quarry's own database and tools one - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151158#4267636 (10Framawiki) [17:31:00] leila: sure [17:33:20] 10Quarry: Query Quarry's own database and tools one - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151158#4267641 (10Framawiki) Added tool' users database per user request at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Quarry#Tool_labs'_user_databases?. [17:36:13] leila: uploaded to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195001#4267658 [17:36:27] * leila checks [17:42:44] thanks bmansurov. I had forgotten that we needed to have the messages for the other 5 languages translated, too. /facepalm. [17:42:51] just poked Diego. ;) [17:52:57] leila: np, I need to make some software changes to use those translations too. [17:53:08] bmansurov: ok. :) [18:05:08] leila, good idea! [18:05:10] I like it. [18:09:21] halfak: great. I'll set up something in the next few hours then. Thank you! [18:09:40] Sounds good. Thank you for thinking of this :) [18:10:03] leila, was thinking... maybe we could repurpose something like the research/analytics hangout time. [18:10:11] scoring/research/analytics hangout time :) [18:11:08] halfak: the thing is that our team wants to dig deep with your team in technical details to see how certain things are done on both sides. Think like a research meeting. The Analytics hang time is already compressed. [18:12:08] halfak: think like this: we need a space to ask your team, tell us everything you're doing on bias, and then we start brainstorming about possible collaborations, etc. or vise-versa, we give you a deeper update on image classification, and your team decides to do x,y,z based on it. [18:12:21] maybe hang time is not a good name for this. deep focus. :D [18:17:06] Ok sounds good to me then. [18:17:10] Separate meeting is fine [18:19:06] halfak: thanks.