[13:47:12] nuria: thanks, I'll pin you [13:47:25] g [14:40:21] leila: o/ [14:40:33] is it ok if I update Florian's contact in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/operations/puppet/+/476861/ ? [14:40:34] elukey: yup [14:41:36] super quick answer, thanks :) [14:42:02] elukey: o/ it was meant for your o/ but I noticed it applied to your question, too [14:42:15] hahahaha okok [14:42:20] elukey: ;p [14:42:24] it went right after my question so I thought it was the answer :) [14:42:54] elukey: re T200875 can you give me a deadline? [14:43:17] elukey: it's been quite crazy on my end and it's not getting better, so I'm going to start working by deadline for a few months. ;) [14:45:43] leila: there is also a follow up to that task, namely reviewing what's left on stat* by researchers not working for wikimedia anymore.. it is not super urgent, I don't want to steal time from other work, but we can say one month? Would it be crazy? Otherwise before all hands? [14:48:44] elukey: both sound great. I would love to start 2019 without this task. ;) [14:49:06] elukey: thank you for your understanding. and I honestly think you pamper us too much sometimes, but hey: I don't mind it. [14:53:27] all right let's do before the end of the month then! I'll update the list of homes on HDFS and on stat boxes so we'll do everything in one pass [14:53:30] :) [14:53:45] yuuuuup [14:54:46] bmansurov: question. i'm trying to decide where to put research code for the Why We Read Wikipedia papers (and hopefully future surveys). I know there are several options but not really sure how to choose amongst them. You have thoughts? Ideas right now were a repo on https://github.com/wikimedia-research or something like https://github.com/wikimedia/research-why-we-read-wikipedia but I'm open to suggestion [15:16:24] isaacj: o/ [15:16:48] isaacj: I can add you to the research team on github, and you can create a repo under that team if you'd like. [15:17:07] isaacj: you can also put your code in gerrit, but creating a gerrit repo usually takes a day or two. [15:17:27] isaacj: depends on what you're trying to achieve. if it's a one off thing, then I'd go with github. [15:17:39] isaacj: let me know what you prefer [15:24:00] bmansurov: thanks! I wouldn't say one-off but i don't think it'll be a simple API that can be called so will likely require cloning and adjusting for a given analysis. so maybe still leaning towards research team on GitHub based on my understanding of Gerritt [15:24:32] isaacj: ok, cool, what's your github username? [15:25:02] btw, you need to have two factor authentication enabled on Github before I can add you to the team. [15:26:01] joh12041 [15:26:13] I'll check on 2FA and get back to you [18:39:29] bmansurov I think we should halt deployment of the survery [20:04:16] j-mo: ok [20:50:45] halAFK: o/ [21:49:17] HaeB: o/ [21:49:52] HaeB: We're finalizing the camera-ready version of the why the world reads Wikipedia, and I remember you mentioned you had some feedback, or at least identified typos. ;) [21:50:25] HaeB: If you have them handy, pass them my way, please. Otherwise, no worries at all. The deadline is Sunday and I'm doing the final touches (no need for you to do extra work right now at all, just if you have them ready.) [21:51:04] HaeB: and if it makes you feel better, I am doing spell-check, though grammar is still a challenge.