[04:22:44] 10Traffic, 10Operations, 10Phabricator, 10Release-Engineering-Team (Kanban): Verify that the codfw lvs is configured correctly for Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168699#3373930 (10mmodell) [04:23:17] 10Traffic, 10Operations, 10Phabricator, 10Release-Engineering-Team (Kanban): Verify that the codfw lvs is configured correctly for Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168699#3373930 (10mmodell) [06:38:44] 10Traffic, 10DBA, 10Operations: dbtree: make wasat a working backend and become active-active - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T163141#3374067 (10Dzahn) [06:39:03] 10Traffic, 10DBA, 10Operations: dbtree: make wasat a working backend and become active-active - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T163141#3187493 (10Dzahn) a:05Dzahn>03None [10:47:55] 10Traffic, 10Operations, 10Patch-For-Review: Explicitly limit varnishd transient storage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T164768#3374447 (10ema) I've queried prometheus as follows to find the maximum transient storage usage per cache_type/layer over the past 30 days: `max by (job,layer) (max_over_time(v... [14:37:00] 10Traffic, 10Operations, 10Patch-For-Review: Explicitly limit varnishd transient storage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T164768#3374918 (10ema) >>! In T164768#3374447, @ema wrote: > When it comes to upload and misc, instead, we should try to find out why transient storage usage grows up to > 50G in cert... [14:47:02] 10Traffic, 10Operations, 10Patch-For-Review: Explicitly limit varnishd transient storage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T164768#3374941 (10BBlack) >>! In T164768#3374447, @ema wrote: > On text, transient storage usage seems pretty reasonable; we could cap as follows, leaving plenty of room for spikes: >...