[00:00:13] saved [00:00:30] Could an admin idling in here do the pointless official "closing" of each section? [00:00:43] I could do most of them I suppose. [00:00:56] Ajraddatz: here, here! [00:00:59] * hoo always wanted to close his own RfA :P [00:01:03] lol hoo :D [00:01:08] i can post at SRP, i don't think that needs someone uninvolved [00:01:37] nothing should need someone uninvolved, it's just number crunching :P - but as we've been over, maybe Sannita could do it. [00:02:02] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm_2013/2 right? [00:02:02] (nothing WRT these confirmations anyways) [00:02:04] yeah. [00:02:06] thanks! [00:02:19] I'll be done in a moment (cit.) [00:06:43] ok, i'm ready to go, just waiting on the closes [00:11:22] ok, saving to meta [00:11:50] Hey you edit conflict me [00:12:03] oh, you were doing it? sorry… :/ [00:13:17] skid... [00:13:54] awkward [00:14:01] rschen7754: skid and I did it (of course he conflicted me) [00:14:18] yeah, seems techman224 and i conflicted on meta :P [00:14:27] :D [00:14:39] anyway, last three aren't confirmed [00:14:48] yup [00:18:09] so we're at a -7 plus the resignations we've had [00:18:51] are we waiting for something to request the formal desysops? [00:19:03] Pink|AwayOrIdk: the stewards will do it once hte three months expires [00:19:06] no need to do that, they will be removed when the temp. adminship expires [00:19:09] ahh [00:21:18] * Jasper_Deng waves to Ajraddatz [00:21:23] hi [00:21:46] Ajraddatz: ensure that my French in my nom statement is comprehensible [00:21:59] so that puts us through all the november 8 admins [00:22:07] now we're doing november 9-10 [00:23:12] Jasper_Deng, it looks good to me, but I do not have very good French. [00:23:32] I understand it but don't know if it's all good grammatically 'n' such. [00:23:42] as long as we can comprehend it [00:25:57] Jasper_Deng: le nombre DE mes modifications [00:26:50] yeah I figured [00:26:56] and "selon" probably isn't the best word... i'm blanking on the right one [00:26:59] though [00:27:41] PinkAmpersand, es-tu canadienne? [00:27:53] / canadien [00:27:56] non... ni suis je canadiEN [00:28:03] oh haha [00:28:08] lol [00:28:28] * Jasper_Deng est né en Canada [00:28:33] * PinkAmpersand wishes there were a way the {{gender}} parser could work on IRC [00:28:52] * Ajraddatz wishes that genders didn't matter in French... sooo much easier D: [00:29:00] * techman224 wants to learn French [00:29:08] Ajraddatz: German is even worse - 3 genders [00:29:14] three?????????? [00:29:28] Ajraddatz: Male, female and things :P [00:29:30] Ajraddatz: je suis américain, mais j'ai vécu en France pendant une année quand j'étais petit, et on parle beaucoup de français à mon école [00:29:41] though the usage is totally incosistent [00:29:46] ಠ_ಠ wut [00:29:47] That's pretty cool. [00:29:51] hoo: isn't "girl" neuter or something? [00:30:06] hoo, are you a thing? xD [00:30:18] Ajraddatz: Well, for persons it's consistent, at least :P [00:30:20] hoo's a *man* ;) [00:30:27] PinkAmpersand: I don't get that question :P [00:30:50] i read that somewhere... that the German word for "girl" is neuter, not feminine [00:31:22] PinkAmpersand: That's true [00:31:24] and weird [00:31:27] yeah... [00:31:31] weird is right [00:31:43] or wyrd, since we're being Germanic [00:32:44] PinkAmpersand: As you see... German totally makes sense :P [00:33:08] I wish that we could be rolling out phase II rather than worry about these RfAs. Anyone know why it's been delayed? [00:33:12] in French, "personne" is always feminine, so you can say "cette personne - elle est un homme!" [00:33:42] at least, that's what I've always been told... it's a weird enough concept that I generally just avoid it myself [00:33:50] (and why we haven't deployed phase I over all of the internet wikipedias?) [00:34:02] bah, I should stop complaining and become a master coder :( [00:36:00] I was looking at the Obama item the other day, and thought, you know, just for teh lolz, we should include Conservapedia ;) [00:36:10] wow everyone's passing round 3 except for 1 [00:36:33] heh [00:36:35] it's too early to make predictions [00:36:48] conservapedia for official wmf project status [00:36:57] I'd support. We need a good humour site :P [00:37:05] The WMF board wouldn't accept [00:37:16] (otherwise it would be on by now) [00:37:18] Isn't there encyclopedia? [00:37:24] *uncyclopedia [00:37:37] It's Wikia [00:38:00] (which has lagged in IPv6 deployment....) [00:38:23] It's actually off Wikia now, as of a month ago. While uncyclopedia is awesome, nobody can beat conservapedia for funny jokes :P [00:39:02] I think we should have a campaign on en-wiki to include Conservapedia and Uncyclopedia in {{Sister project links}}... à la http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Conservapedia [00:39:05] Is there a liberalpedia or something too? I bet it would be equally and oppositely funny :p [00:39:27] what about ED? [00:39:37] Ajraddatz: it's called the enwp.org/Conservapedia article on enwiki ;) [00:39:43] hehe [00:39:53] ED is just a porn hub [00:40:05] hence the liberalpedia-ness [00:40:27] if that's not one of the rules of the internet, it should be... the more liberal a site's politics, the greater percentage of porn it contains [00:40:49] well, weird porn, at least. like tumblr .gif porn, which is just.... strange [00:41:11] the funniest thing about them actually is the way they call log entries [00:41:22] (at least to me) [00:41:38] I like uncyc's huff log instead of deletion log [00:41:42] * Ajraddatz checks ED [00:42:05] "resurrected" instead of unblocked [00:42:09] "plumbing log" lol [00:44:43] The new site is at http://en.uncyclopedia.co/ [00:44:59] they've changed their domain like a gazillion times [00:45:23] ED has like 3 forks now [00:45:34] The domains for the different languages are not consistent. [00:50:26] btw, the funniest inadvertently funny conservative website is massresistance.org, which seems to think that scare quotes discredit absolutely anything [00:51:02] how ironic [00:51:20] heh [00:51:26] free uncyclopedia will live [00:51:35] Jasper_Deng: thats because wikia wont give up .org [00:52:28] duh: for ED? [00:52:39] oh i thought you were talking about uncyclopedia [00:52:49] ED is just stupid [01:24:51] can someone please import enwp.org/Template:Tlsu ? {{Subst only}} relies on it for non-templatespace pages [01:26:27] PinkAmpersand: Looks ok to me [01:26:39] hmm? [01:26:52] Will do ;) [01:27:08] thanks :) [01:28:17] PinkAmpersand: Here you go: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Tlsu&action=history Do the necessary clean up work, please [01:28:55] such as? [01:29:15] Dunno let me have a look :P [01:29:51] PinkAmpersand, hoo: Just corrected a link [01:30:05] It links to "Wikipedia:Substitution" and has no doc [01:30:16] Jasper_Deng: Thanks... [01:30:27] Look ok despite ;) [01:30:35] ahh good call [01:31:07] well, you can import the doc page if you want. but it's really just a behind-the-scenes template [01:31:49] I guess it's ok as is [01:31:50] Jasper_Deng: mind if I change the link to a local one (i.e. the item # for Wikipedia:Substitution) if we have one? [01:31:58] PinkAmpersand: we don't have one [01:32:12] hoo: i think there's a category it should go in... I'll find it later [01:32:13] it definitely wouldn't be as helpful [01:32:36] Jasper_Deng: aww but i kinda like using local links for that stuff :/ [01:32:53] PinkAmpersand: then let's make a project page [01:33:04] it's not like things like our blocking policy have to be items [01:33:15] PinkAmpersand: "Templates" [01:33:26] and maybe Category:Template:Subst only [01:33:44] Jasper_Deng: you might as well revert me at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:Shortcut , then [01:33:58] hoo: no, i think that's for templates that should be substituted [01:34:23] PinkAmpersand: ah, right... I'm tired [01:49:42] PinkAmpersand: no big deal btw, you can revert me [01:49:56] (but be prepared to defend the action) [03:22:14] Anyone here interested in astronomy? [03:24:42] Or astrophysics for that matter? [03:26:13] Widewuto, what do you need? [03:26:56] techman224: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Infoboxes_task_force/places <- is there a way to implement these things yet? [03:27:35] Widewuto, phase 2 gets deployed on Monday [03:28:06] But, according to Meta, Wikidata's geographic coordinates only support locations on Earth. [03:28:23] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Data_model#Geographic_locations [03:28:34] geographic locations won't be in for a while [03:29:17] Widewuto, you can propose it at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal [03:29:30] It would be GREAT if we could support this -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_coordinate_system [03:29:54] to locate objects on the celestial sphere [03:32:41] Even better, the [[w:celestial coordinate system]] [03:33:06] (all of the major ones) [03:33:45] Widewuto, that's a lot to propose [03:34:13] techman224: we could stick to just the equatorial coordinate system if needed [03:34:56] Widewuto, we need something for things in space [03:35:22] rschen7754: can we use Wikidata to specify relative positions? [03:35:33] Widewuto: no idea [03:35:54] keep in mind that only the commons files and other item types get deployed on monday [03:37:05] techman224: so will it eventually be fixed? [03:37:17] "other item types" ? [03:37:53] Widewuto, only two datatypes will be supported at launch [03:38:01] http://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/01/30/wikidata-coming-to-the-next-two-wikipedias/ [03:40:47] techman224: http://essayweb.net/astronomy/coordinates.shtml [03:43:51] Alternatively we could just use right ascension and declension as separate parameters of the "infobox", would that work? [03:44:14] I'm not an astronomer, but we should be comprehensive in our properties [03:47:09] So should we use separate parameters for right ascension, declination? [04:03:11] State of the art positioning on earth is now in the millimetre range [04:03:30] Try to make systems that maintain precission [04:14:03] techman224, why block those IPs? and for such a long time? [04:14:13] Ajraddatz, open proxies [04:14:21] but they will never be used again [04:14:25] and that isn't even a good reason [04:14:45] Open proxies always get blocked for a long time [04:14:51] for what reason? [04:14:54] yeah, the stewards even do it globally [04:15:16] I requested one, and it got blocked for two years [04:15:22] for what reason? [04:15:24] because open proxies are easy to abuse [04:15:32] wikis are easy to abuse... [04:16:04] well by your logic, we should throw out the abuse filter then [04:16:04] Sorry. I just don't understand the need to block IPs which won't be used again for spam anyways, and will most likely be globally blocked as well. [04:16:32] Actually, the abuse filter made is also useless, since it doesn't work in the mainspace yet. [04:16:38] open proxies are the same as shared accounts [04:17:11] yes, they can be [04:17:46] Ajraddatz, I thought they fixed that [04:18:13] they're holding off the fix pending some discussion [04:22:42] Is there a bug? [04:22:52] …or discussion? [04:22:57] on project chat [04:23:07] I think it just doesn't work on the wikibase stuff yet [04:23:52] it still helps with spambots [04:24:13] rschen7754, my filter is not working [04:24:38] oh I forgot, it was a different url [04:24:41] did you take it from somewhere? [04:25:01] rschen7754, I created it and tested it on a edit before it got reverted [04:25:12] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/examine?wpSearchUser=84.157.221.86&wpSearchPeriodStart=&wpSearchPeriodEnd=&submit=1&title=Special%3AAbuseFilter%2Fexamine [04:25:12] it helps with spambots, just not in the main space (iirc) [04:25:44] yeah there's a lot of userspace spambotting [04:25:45] The problem with examining is that it can't get to deleted items [04:25:46] WMF wide [04:27:05] I also think that the spam blacklist doesn't work either [04:27:27] it probably doesn't [04:27:38] but the sbl is antiquated technology anyways [04:27:49] I hope they replace it with phalanx soon. [04:29:09] and yeah, the abusefilter can help against the userpage spam. This current filter is against the mainspace spammers though. [04:30:21] rschen7754, how is the roads taskforce thing going? [04:30:37] caek: going pretty well [04:30:47] my guess is 90% of the roads in the US have items [04:30:52] that's pretty good [04:31:01] and some editors from dewp are working on europe [04:31:15] I've never really followed the task forces, maybe I'll have a quick look through a filter recentchanges before heading to bed... [04:31:15] working on proposing stuff for phase 2 now [04:31:39] I wish they'd hurry up, with both deployment of phase I and releasing phase II [04:31:50] but, I can't really complain because I can't help :p [04:32:13] phase 2 is being deployed on Monday [04:32:33] well, phase 2A technically [04:33:01] :o [04:33:11] fully functional? what won't be part of it? [04:33:37] the only fields that will be part of it are commons files, and links to other WD items [04:33:56] ah [04:34:05] oh well, a start at least [04:36:45] I never knew wiktionary had other languages in English [04:41:54] les wikipédistes [04:55:56] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal#Roads [06:58:30] item 4,000,000. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q4000000 description from someone who speaks German, please, so I can put it on WD:NEWS? [06:59:01] yippe [07:03:48] yay 4M [07:04:03] https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:News&diff=5605871&oldid=5494376 [07:04:13] the honor goes to some IP with very very good timing [08:01:11] * PinkAmpersand needs a second opinion on something from someone else who speakes French [08:02:33] Wiki13: you around? [08:13:11] PinkAmpersand: now, yes... [08:13:23] ahh. you speak a little French, right? [08:15:28] my babel says 1 :P [08:15:40] so, the basics I would day :P [08:15:44] say [08:16:24] better than nothing :P [08:16:55] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind ... do you think it should go with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2307461# or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1027525 ? [08:18:44] 2nd one I think [08:19:03] as it sums up some books of the series, right? [08:20:20] yeah. that's what i thought too. it's just that it's *nominally* about the book [08:20:31] but way more of the content seems to be about the series in general [08:20:37] just a poorly written article :P [08:21:10] hehe, indeed [08:51:13] hello [10:38:17] all right, the round 2 confirmations went through meta [12:42:33] mh I'm wondering about a new abusefilter [12:42:53] currently main namespace is not supposed to have any external link [12:43:24] Hallo [12:43:43] hi Amir [12:44:23] Afaik, to add a title to an item in a different language, one must switch the interface to that language. [12:44:59] Isn't there an easier way to add a title in a different language? [12:45:26] It's becoming a frequent scenario now: [12:46:27] I may want to create an item page for an entity, about which there's an article only in Hebrew, [12:47:23] And to make it easier to find for people who know English I'd like to add a title in English. [12:48:05] But switching the whole interface back and forth is not so convenient. [16:42:37] Anyone around who can give me voice (or better op) in #cvn-wikidata? [17:44:41] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "(bug 44538) jQuery.wikibase.listview.ListItemAdapter value awareness" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47217 [17:44:41] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "(bug 44538) add/removeListItem functions for wb.listview plus related events" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47218 [17:44:41] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "(bug 44538) Simple counter for statementview's references" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47219 [17:45:52] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "Refactoring of PropertyEditTool's counter into a more generic function" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47220 [17:49:44] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "Refactoring of PropertyEditTool's counter into a more generic function" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47220 [17:55:59] Heyho :) . [17:56:12] First IRC try in Wikidata content. [17:56:18] It works :) . [17:58:19] Hello Jeblad_WMDE- [18:39:39] New patchset: Daniel Werner; "(bug 44538) using wb.utilities.buildPendingCounter() for references counter now" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47226 [19:05:16] sly move there, Stryn, starting from the bottom ;) [19:07:06] yeah, I don't wanna conflicts :) [19:07:47] bonus points for adding a Finnish label and description to the one I screwed up :P [19:09:28] :D [19:09:34] and either that or you want all the deletions for yourself ;) admin log actions are a precious commodity. i've been thinking of offering admins who need to get their stats up a heads-up when I'm amount to file a request, in exchange for a small cash contribution, of course ;) [19:10:30] I'm not going to delete items just for getting my stats look better ;) [19:10:58] haha i know. i'm teasing. since all the admins at RfA are complaining that there's never any work to do [19:12:05] there were not, but now there is much work, because of spam bots and many items which are deleted on Wikipedia. [19:33:12] grrr [19:36:41] who keeps defining messages for lib modules in repo.... [20:44:51] arrghghga [21:16:26] anyone else getting fatal error messages? [21:16:45] PinkAmpersand: where? :/ [21:17:15] just tried to make an edit to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Glossary [21:17:43] [783f4401] 2013-02-02 21:17:35: Fatal exception of type MWException [21:18:34] Sounds like Translate extension [21:18:51] yeah [21:19:02] what's wrong with it? [21:19:06] or what am i doing wrong? [21:19:15] the English copy is the original... [21:19:16] PinkAmpersand: I'm investigating [21:20:48] Stryn: How to find items, deleted on Wikipedia? [21:22:43] hoo: still getting the error message :( [21:23:28] PinkAmpersand: mh [21:23:33] BenutzerConny: are you asking how to find items where the only article's been deleted? [21:23:42] I have details now... but am still clueless [21:23:53] hmm. should we ping one of the devs? [21:24:10] PinkAmpersand: Yesz :) . [21:24:27] (Jeblad_WMDE you were the last to edit the page successfully... any thoughts?) [21:25:08] Hm, I'm editing translations now [21:25:17] Just set the page for translation [21:25:43] Jeblad_WMDE: yeah, i saw. ec'd with the copy-edit i was trying to make, which is what's now triggering the internal error [21:27:24] ok, didn't get any error myself [21:28:00] BenutzerConny: well, what I do is go through the deletion logs on wikipedias where we already have a lot of the links. then i do a browser search (ctrl+f) for whatever edit summary they use to mark articles that have been deleted through the local AfD equivalent (since speedy-deleted articles are unlikely to be included in entries). then i enable yair's [21:28:00] Wikidata preview script on the local Wikipedia, and open a bunch of the deleted articles, checking to see which ones include links to Wikidata items. once i round up a bunch of those articles, I click the "bulk delete" button (created by yours truly :) ) and RfD them all at once [21:28:54] PinkAmpersand: I can edit that page jsut fine :/ [21:29:09] PinkAmpersand: Ahh. Thank you. Seems hard work without a script :) . [21:29:25] hoo: hmm. i saw. just reloaded the edit window and tried again, to no avail :( [21:29:50] Log out, log back in [21:29:56] Btw, what browser? [21:30:00] I still want to blame the translate extension... [21:30:08] Jeblad_WMDE: Did you see the traceback? [21:30:15] http://p.defau.lt/?dS2GliYRZLbirRpME8TWDA [21:30:18] I don't know why but Firefox have trouble with wikidata [21:30:22] BenutzerConny: yeah... i should really get someone to make one sometime. on the bright side, i've cleared nl-wiki back to Jan 23rd (before which almost none of the AfD'ed articles have items) and fr-wiki back to the 18th [21:30:51] That's not browser related... my bet is Translate extension and the parser [21:30:58] PinkAmpersand: Whoohw. [21:31:06] Jeblad_WMDE: Ajax? ;) [21:32:22] Jeblad_WMDE: logging out and back in didn't work [21:32:34] PinkAmpersand: Still the exception error? [21:32:43] In my opinion Wikidata is very Javascript etc. heavy, but maybe this is standard in this days... Or not possible in another way? [21:33:03] BenutzerConny: haha last i checked i'd effected the deletion of 0.007% of Wikidata [21:33:13] hoo: yup :( [21:33:31] PinkAmpersand: Which language do you have your user interface in? English? [21:33:39] hoo: it's a good copy-edit, too :/ if I PM it to you, can you post it on my behalf? [21:33:40] yeah [21:33:42] This is outside Wikibase [21:34:00] PinkAmpersand: Go ahead... ;) [21:37:40] PinkAmpersand: Its something happening in the edit that makes the parser go gaclonck.. [21:38:46] really? [21:39:55] seems so, but i have no idea why [21:39:59] * hoo still bets on the Translate extension [21:40:44] No reference to translate extension, but it could be that one that generates the key that is failing [21:40:51] yeah, you're right [21:41:15] turns out when i resolved the edit conflict, i accidentally deleted two of the translate tags [21:41:21] which made the wiki very angry [21:41:26] hoo: false alarm :P [21:41:36] Perhaps I forgot some marker during my edit.. But I coould not spot any error [21:41:48] ach sooo.. [21:41:59] no, no, it was all my fault [21:42:12] * Jeblad_WMDE smacks PinkAmpersand that is so productive and creates bugs.. [21:42:14] xD [21:42:28] PinkAmpersand: An exception can never be your fault (unless you're a developer of course) [21:42:28] just another casualty of the God-awful edit-conflict interface [21:42:32] ...I have never done that! [21:42:42] What was the issue? (/me is going to bug report) [21:42:54] hoo: i forgot two of the tags [21:43:31] hoo please report the bug as it would be nice if it gets less-fatal in the future [21:43:49] PinkAmpersand: Is that in the text you sent me? [21:44:01] specifically: [21:44:01] # {{anchor|Rank-preferred}} [21:44:01] (6 lines later...) [21:44:01] # {{anchor|Rank-deprecated}} [21:44:23] hoo: the text i sent you was missing the tags too, yeah. [21:44:35] but I don't get the exception, grr [21:44:55] doesn't the translation extention have a bajillion checks built into it? [21:45:03] maybe this was a half-baked one? [21:45:39] (speaking of fixing bugs, someone remind me to make {{Rfd group}} extra awesome when I get the chance) [21:46:07] PinkAmpersand: Can you give me the exact text that caused the exception? [21:46:37] i believe it was the *lack* of that text that caused the exception... those 2 anchor/ tag lines [21:46:39] It's much easier to fix if it's reproducible [21:48:09] hoo: kk, 1 sec [21:49:03] hoo: hmm... i can't save it anywhere onwiki, even in my sandbox [21:49:17] Great (sounds weird) [21:49:34] Some of the corrections are wrong.. [21:50:01] hoo: give me a sec [21:50:02] PinkAmpersand: Can you possibly post wrap in a [21:50:04] A rank is not assigned to a statement, it is an implied part of the statement [21:50:07] * post it [21:50:17] Jeblad_WMDE: oh. oops. if i screwed up anything technical, fix it [21:50:50] Jeblad_WMDE: I was just trying to make it flow better. I'm no Wikibase expert though, so sorry if I misunderstood any part of it. [21:51:53] hoo: yeah, that should work [21:51:55] The original text is a bit awkward .. [21:52:36] hoo: there you go https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User:PinkAmpersand/sandbox&oldid=5661038 [21:52:58] Jeblad_WMDE: mine or yours? [21:53:31] Its not really mine, its from the data model [21:53:35] Marcus wrote it [21:53:41] PinkAmpersand: Grr, that works for me [21:53:48] I don't get an exception [21:53:56] hoo: even if you rm the s? [21:54:24] "Unbalanced tag. Translation template: " [21:54:27] ...is assigned to a statement.... -> ...is used for a statement.... ..? [21:54:30] But no exception [21:54:56] Jeblad_WMDE: ahh. that explains it. all of the tech/gadget/bot documentation stuff is really poorly translated. [21:55:16] PinkAmpersand: My proposal, is that more like it? [21:55:27] hoo: hmmm... do you have a non-admin account you could try it with? [21:55:58] Jeblad_WMDE: yeah, i think "used for" would work well [21:56:05] It would be nice if you change it so it doesn't look like I override you.. :D [21:56:29] * Jeblad_WMDE tries to avoid edit warring on wikidata [21:57:06] as you wish. all part of the collaborative process, if you ask me, but ok. [21:57:28] PinkAmpersand: Sure [21:57:36] I doubt that's the issue, though [21:58:01] hoo: I mean, I can't think of why that would change anything, but that's the biggest difference between us that comes to mind. [21:59:17] Ok... even as IP I get that [21:59:26] weird [21:59:40] and I got the error even in my sandbox [22:00:07] PinkAmpersand: Still the exception? [22:00:28] yeah. should i try it again? [22:00:39] Please, yes [22:02:32] kk 1 sec [22:03:36] hoo: yep. still happening. and this is just when i preview it. want a screenshot? [22:06:12] PinkAmpersand: Just copy the text [22:06:40] Internal error [22:06:40] [1233adbe] 2013-02-02 22:03:17: Fatal exception of type MWException [22:07:12] I once had the same error on Wikivoyage [22:07:32] * Jasper_Deng hasn't got it [22:07:35] * Vogone fixed it with deleting and restoring the page [22:07:56] Vogone: haha the luxuries of adminship [22:08:10] * PinkAmpersand deletes and restores Vogone to see if it fixes anything [22:08:14] xD [22:09:20] My RfA: "The main reason I need the tools is so that when I encounter a problem, I can see if deleting some stuff fixes anything." [22:09:54] PinkAmpersand: on which wiki? [22:10:09] Jasper_Deng: lol on SatiricalWiki [22:10:32] though I plan on running here in a few weeks [22:10:54] PinkAmpersand: I'd support [22:11:11] +1 [22:11:13] at what dates do the RFAs become permanent? [22:11:25] I guess they already are [22:11:35] but I'm not sure [22:12:51] they are, since the RfC was closed [22:15:10] hmm. then maybe i'll run during the monthlong reconfirmation hiatus [22:15:36] PinkAmpersand: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44608 [22:15:39] I guess its time for running for admin again.. [22:15:56] * Jeblad_WMDE hates voting over such things as adminship [22:16:08] me too, actually [22:16:21] which is why 5 days is what we're doing [22:16:33] * Jasper_Deng imagines CU will be needed this summer though [22:16:34] hoo: my very own bug :D [22:16:37] * PinkAmpersand bookmarks it [22:17:13] :D [22:17:14] anyone have any pointers on things i should bone up on before i run? [22:19:08] thing about wikidata is there's <20 guidelines [22:19:20] so BOLD and IAR are the way we go atm [22:19:22] as compared to say enwp where there's… a lot [22:19:49] ehhhh http://www.wikidata.org/?diff=5661734&oldid=3758061&rcid=5660724 [22:20:00] copy/pasting has got to stop [22:20:41] i'm telling y'all, we need a template for it :P it's never gonna stop on its own [22:21:16] PinkAmpersand: more like an edit-notice actually [22:21:25] this should be possible for the Wikipedia previewing gadget [22:21:26] I was working on a similarity measure, the plan was to either tag all weird-looking edits or to make the analysis available in AbuseFilter [22:21:47] Jeblad_WMDE: but I thought you didn't like using AbuseFilter for good-faith edits [22:21:49] rschen7754: haha yeah... i meant more editing areas wise, etc... idk, I've only been a Wikimedian since November, so if I want to become an admin on a project in February or March, I should have a really really good record [22:21:52] It woul basically halt copy-pasting as the entries would be flagged as dissimilar [22:22:11] Tag'ing can be done outside AbuseFilter [22:22:40] IBut for AbuseFilter I guess I'm going to write a bug about renaming it [22:22:41] that could be glitchy [22:22:45] yeah wikidata's pretty easy to RFA on [22:22:59] wikidata is (unfortunately) still more about your work elsewhere [22:23:00] Jeblad_WMDE: there's already a bug on it. It doesn't look like it's happening. [22:23:23] Ajraddatz: perhaps we should introduce a new voting requirement that you should have at least 10 edits on Wikidata before voting [22:23:38] I think if its not happening, then the use of AF to tag users edits as abusive must stop [22:24:14] It is actually _illegal_ in some countries to make such logs if you can't rectify erroneous entries [22:25:10] You must also be able to identify every single one that has access to the data and be able to identify them [22:25:22] we don't want that.. [22:25:25] ;/ [22:26:17] can a German admin please check that this https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MisterSynergy is all above-board, and then give him autopatroller? [22:26:20] Vogone ^ [22:26:33] Hey Grondin. [22:26:35] (I'll do the rights change if you approve of it) [22:26:40] / Bonjour :) [22:26:54] bonjour Ajraddatz [22:27:59] PinkAmpersand: Checked and flagged :D [22:28:03] darn, bugs in glossary.. [22:28:05] :) [22:28:58] an item can have several links to a single site, but I don't know if its turned on [22:29:40] Jeblad_WMDE: that would help sooo much with some disambiguation stuff [22:29:59] where one rogue wiki's choice to split a dab page screws everything up for all the other ones [22:30:04] Jasper_Deng: /me is no German admin who could give out this flag ;) [22:30:10] I am really looking forward to phase II on Monday... when is the English Wikipedia getting added? [22:30:18] Vogone: hence why I offered to make the actual change [22:30:22] feb 11 [22:30:29] Vogone: Aren't you? [22:30:34] oh, indeed ^^ [22:30:38] hoo: no [22:30:49] I'm not sure if it works like that now.. [22:30:50] Didn't your RfA pass? [22:31:02] he resigned [22:31:02] he resigned [22:31:09] ah, ok [22:31:09] bah, ninja'd [22:31:11] it passed but I got inactive and resigned [22:31:15] but aren't you a GS? [22:31:18] yes [22:31:26] GSs can't set rights though [22:31:30] rschen7754, how did the RfC on enwp go? [22:31:31] oh [22:31:31] but they can't assign any rights [22:31:38] Ajraddatz: it failed [22:31:41] lol [22:31:55] so they are just going to do nothing about it, let the change come? [22:32:13] I got GS after resigning on wikidata ^^ [22:32:26] rschen7754: we really should get someone to make a bot that will replace the GA/FA interwikis if people remove them [22:33:20] yeah, because enwp hates all other wikis [22:34:36] well, the feeling is usually mutual :p [22:36:15] At least it seems like the "Add" diesn't like existing siteids, but I'm pretty sure the rest of the code accepts categories.. [22:36:47] enwp doesn't even get along with commons very well [22:38:12] Wikidata's as loveable as it gets, though [22:38:24] until we subsume all the Wikipedias ;) [22:43:03] Wait until we create the "wiki" datatype! [22:43:08] Muahahaha! [22:43:19] We're going to eat Wikipedia! [22:43:21] xD [22:43:46] Anyone wonder why we don't have a wiki-type? =D [22:46:12] Jeblad_WMDE: lay out what that class would contain [22:46:53] Parsed wikitext? [22:47:06] Copy-paste right from wikipedia? [22:47:23] heh [22:47:30] copyrights everywhere [22:47:35] Jeblad_WMDE: we already have those. they're called half our descriptions [22:47:41] LOL [22:47:43] brb [22:47:47] I wonder how $enwiki=new wiki("Wikipedia","en",$content); would take to execute xD [22:49:02] there we go [22:49:19] okay [22:55:17] * hoo slaps himself [22:55:32] hoo: why? [22:56:15] I didn't read a documentation correctly and wondered why it's not doing as I want for minutes :P [22:56:34] good night [22:56:50] 'night Vogone [22:57:14] :) [22:58:59] Whats fun with translated documentation is that sometime you end up in a dispute over errors in the documentation, where the opponent claims that the translation is right accoring to the source documentation, but where you know that the source documentation is wrong according to the code. [23:00:02] That is a kind of weird edit war.. Long since now.' [23:00:32] Jebled_WMDE: example? [23:01:33] Rather not.. XD [23:01:48] Just a fun tidbits about my many edit wars.. [23:01:58] * Jeblad_WMDE is very bad sometimes [23:02:32] But another thing, strings like .. [23:02:36] '''Preferred rank''' er brukt for et utsagn som har den viktigste og mest oppdaterte informasjonen. Et slikt utsagn vil bli vist til alle brukere, og vil bli brukt i Wikipedias infobokser som standard. (For example, the most recent population figures for Berlin.) [23:02:53] Should we write the example stuff in an parenthesis? [23:03:01] It lloks odd to me.. [23:03:34] Sorry, that was part Norwegian.. [23:03:49] '''Preferred rank''' is used for a statement with the most important and most up-to-date information. Such a statement will be shown to all users and will be displayed in Wikipedia infoboxes by default. (For example, the most recent population figures for Berlin.) [23:04:25] Pink|TV|Banshee: what do you say, if I may drag you from the TV..