[01:05:07] highway_system has fallen to 6th :/ [01:05:18] Change merged: John Erling Blad; [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50493 [01:49:00] New review: John Erling Blad; "Works for me!" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master); V: 2 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50495 [01:49:00] Change merged: John Erling Blad; [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50495 [02:00:42] New review: John Erling Blad; "Not checking the actual usabillity of the addition, only that it doesn't break anything and looks sane." [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master); V: 2 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50483 [02:00:43] Change merged: John Erling Blad; [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50483 [02:18:44] We have 2 003 active users! [02:31:48] New review: John Erling Blad; "(2 comments)" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [02:33:48] New review: John Erling Blad; "Think we can try this for now." [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master) C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50157 [02:33:49] Change merged: John Erling Blad; [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50157 [02:34:18] techman224: :) [02:37:22] We have more editors than Wikivoyage [02:40:15] trololol [02:41:00] P59 shot up [02:41:15] New review: John Erling Blad; "(1 comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50186 [03:16:46] New review: John Erling Blad; "Got several of these when I loaded this changeset together with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/5..." [mediawiki/extensions/DataValues] (master); V: -1 - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50186 [07:09:11] ugh [07:09:20] i keep getting issues with en.wikidata :/ [07:15:25] * Jasper_Deng uses www.wikidata [07:15:45] i'm clicking on interwiki links [07:15:49] * Hazard-SJ uses www.wikidata too [07:16:25] legoktm: Write a script to redirect you then :P [07:16:31] JavaScript [07:16:45] too lazy [07:17:21] well keep clicking and changing en to www [07:17:33] https://en.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Legobot/Conflicts/itwiki [07:17:34] :/ [07:17:43] none of those are conflicts [07:17:50] but someone removed the local langlinks [07:43:51] legoktm: https://toolserver.org/~legoktm/wd_redir.log :| [07:44:14] oh lol [07:44:17] thats outdated [07:45:01] Oh [07:49:52] yeah ive been running it manually since i havent gotten SGE working yet [07:50:46] New review: Nikerabbit; "Please make up your mind: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/49854" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50493 [11:01:55] Lydia_WMDE: You guys work 24x7? ;-) [11:02:17] multichill: hehe not quite but... [11:03:42] I did a lot of catching up work for the hackathon yesterday. I was thinking: We could do a proper wikibase implementation in Pywikipedia during the weekend [11:03:51] Using the same data model etc [11:07:35] Lydia_WMDE : And looking ahead at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Wikidata_and_Commons :P [11:08:21] my idea was to mainly concentrate on small tasks and helping new people get into coding on wikibase [11:09:07] If you have the lib part properly done in Pywikipedia it's much much easier to build actual useful bots on top of that [11:09:38] So you don't have to worry about low level api stuff. [11:10:03] yeah [11:49:01] Lydia_WMDE: Was any new software deployed in the last 24 hours? Getting some new errors I haven't seen before [11:49:44] multichill: nope - what are you seeing? [11:50:02] Than someone probably changed pywikipedia ;-) [11:50:42] ok [11:50:55] away for a bit - back later [11:51:05] Ah, proper exceptions are being thrown now :-) [11:51:13] Hi DanielK_WMDE__ [11:52:35] Hi I'd like some assistance [11:52:44] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5250867 [11:53:06] How do I set this up so I can convert Infobox legislation fields? [11:53:40] At the very least I'd like to put the following as 'fields' [11:53:44] Long title [11:54:31] Short title, Year (calander), Year(Regnal) ,chapter, topic, repeals, [11:54:39] How do I set up those fields? [11:56:14] Qcoder00: you can't yet as the necessary datatypes for time for example are not there yet [11:56:21] they're being developed atm [11:56:33] OK [11:56:43] as for some others have a look at the page List of Properties [11:56:57] and there should also be a link to a page for proposals for new properties [11:57:03] At the very least I'd like to have a way of mapping short titles to regenal years and vice versa [11:57:41] Lydia_WMDE: Do you have a direct link? [11:58:07] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties [11:58:14] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal [12:00:10] Lydia_WMDE [12:00:20] Why I'm asking is because of : - [12:01:25] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Portal:Acts_of_the_Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom/Anne/6Ann which i felt would be better done as a wikidata item [12:01:53] (Currently that table is generated using templates and page transclusion which isn't ideal) [12:02:19] *nod* [12:02:25] looking [12:02:50] hmm yeah looks like something wikidata can help with in the future [12:02:50] There are also addtional fields in Infobox legislation at Wikipedia. [12:03:00] it'll still take a bit for that though [12:03:16] right now the number of data types is pretty limited [12:03:23] we'll roll out more in the next weeks [12:03:24] The official dataset at legislation.gov.uk includes repeal data down to sections ! [12:03:46] So if there is a Wikidata way of storing such tables it would be VERY useful [12:04:13] there will be a way to create such a table based on data in wikidata in the future, yes [12:04:22] OK [12:04:40] Can you examine that page and develop a workable proposal? [12:05:04] not at this time, no, sorry [12:05:10] that part is phase 3 of wikidata [12:05:15] OK [12:05:31] When is Phase3 Infobox conversion planned for? [12:05:34] we're concentrated on phase 2 atm [12:05:49] infobox data in articles is phase 2 [12:06:01] we're working on that and want to have something out there soon [12:07:15] OK Ideally given it's nature, I'd like to have the legislation table considered soon, because Infobox legislation is widely used on English Wikipedia [12:07:16] time for food :) - laters [12:07:22] sure [12:07:36] the existing infoboxes will continue to work though [12:07:39] so there is no super rush [12:34:49] New review: Tpt; "(1 comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [12:44:53] Lydia_WMDE: Hi! Some questions: is the deployment of String datatype planned with the next deployment of MediaWiki? [12:44:55] Is something already planned for Commons or Wikisource? [12:46:09] Tpt_: no it'll probably be the one after that [12:46:41] next deployment will only be small fixes if everything goes as planned [12:47:39] Ok. And what about monolingual and multilingual texts? Will it be done at the same time as string or after? [12:48:38] afaik it's not being worked on yet so after would be my guess [12:48:53] but not 100% sure [12:49:39] Thanks. And about "sister projects"? [12:50:18] something for the second year of wikidata [12:50:24] so after march [12:52:27] Ok. Thanks. If you needs some help about Wikisource, I'll be very happy to help.. [12:52:44] :) [12:52:45] thx [12:56:57] Change on 12mediawiki a page Extension:Wikibase was modified, changed by Mange01 link https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=651380 edit summary: [+103] /* See also */ [13:01:33] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Category:Archived_requests_for_permissions <- such a mess -.- [13:13:57] Wiki13: do you know {{uw-link-removal1}} ? [13:13:57] 10[1] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/Template:uw%2Dlink%2Dremoval1 [13:14:33] I didn´t know it existed until now [13:14:45] jsut saw your revert [13:14:57] *just [13:15:40] benestar: do I need to add it like a warning on enwiki? [13:15:53] like == February 2013 == ? [13:16:14] don't know, we don't have a policy about that [13:16:28] well [13:16:35] I just do it then like that [15:20:55] Wiki13: if you add "welcome=yes", it'll add {{subst:welcome}} and ==February 2013== for you (internationalized, too) [15:20:56] 10[2] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/Template:welcome [15:21:25] ah [15:21:44] thanks for lettting me know PinkAmpersand [15:21:52] welcome :) [15:21:57] I´ll keep that in mind for next time [15:22:20] i'm also gonna go create uw-lr shortcuts for all 4 of them [15:23:18] but for the info, I use English in the interface :P [15:23:33] even when I´m Dutch :p [15:23:44] so? [15:25:33] ah.. I misunderstood something 9.9 [15:25:37] nvm me then [15:25:55] but does Twinkle work here already or? [15:27:02] no. someone should really import it [15:27:34] mhm [15:28:24] Wiki13: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TW#Twinkle_on_other_wikis [15:29:47] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Category:Archived_requests_for_permissions <- is a bit of a mess imo [15:30:35] the different requests like admin requests could be sorted in a new category [15:30:45] but thats my view on it [15:37:46] Wiki13: yeah that's on my list of things to clean up [15:38:26] ah [15:40:57] though if you want to do it yourself, be my guest ;) [16:01:28] Wiki13: Please stop deleting things that are in use [16:02:06] multichill: they are restored already [16:02:43] Can you check my deleted contributions? I lost a lot of paths at https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User:Multichill/Charlemagne&diff=prev&oldid=7600318 [16:03:11] legoktm: You should update your empty item detection [16:03:52] I only see deleted properties in your contribs multichill [16:04:03] Oh? Which ones? [16:04:09] ehm [16:04:40] P93, P83, P68, P34, P33 and P28 [16:05:50] In human language? [16:06:31] Property:P93, Property:P83, Property:P68, Property:P34, Property:P33 and Property:P28? [16:06:46] all deleted by Moe Epsilon afais [16:07:19] What were the properties about? [16:07:24] ehm [16:08:33] prefecuture, settlement, stuff like that [16:09:17] Ah, that stuff [16:09:20] your contribs are like 13:04, 23 February 2013 . . Multichill (talk | contribs | block) (1,535 bytes) (‎Changed [en] description: DEPRECATED, please use Property:P131 (located in administrative unit)) [16:09:30] That's going to be a nice mess ;-) [16:10:15] but deleting stuff that was in use was my stupid mistake [16:11:08] legoktm should improve his empty item detection [16:12:59] [[Wikidata:Notability]] really needs to be updated... [16:12:59] 10[3] 10https://wikidata.wikidata.org/wiki/Notability [16:13:59] it still documents phase ... [16:14:01] 1 [16:15:02] Wiki13: Hmm, https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AMultichill%2FCharlemagne&diff=7600318&oldid=7596407 doesn't recover so I lost a link somewhere..... [16:16:43] none of those were in use, correct? I looked and it didn't appear to be. Anything wrong? [16:19:03] multichill: I don´t really understand... what kind of link do you mean? [16:19:34] I'm building family trees. I lost a large part and that's probably because someone removed something [16:20:27] do you manually update the page or automatic? [16:20:40] That's automatic, just a tree search [16:22:32] mhm [16:24:36] well I have to head out, if anyone has any problems with the four/five deprecated templates I deleted, drop me a message at my talk page and I can undelete, or you can be bold and do it yourself :) [16:25:44] if you can ofcourse :p [16:26:25] (if you are an admin, yes xD) [16:26:35] hey, on Wikipedia, if you press "rollback" but the person you're rollig back has edited since then (but nobody else has), does the rollback go through or not? [16:27:19] btw, Moe or Wiki13, think this deserves RevDel? I'd say it's pretty defamatory https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2840298&diff=7603913&oldid=4002941 [16:27:37] mhm [16:27:49] yikes [16:28:11] theres one reason [16:28:34] Inappropriate comment or personal information [16:28:55] under which it may be RevDel´ed [16:29:55] PinkAmpersand: do you think it´s right if I hide it with that reason? [16:30:26] yeah, I think that qualifies as "inappropriate comment" [16:30:46] yeah, it's a political leader, not a terrorist, so it's pretty gross [16:30:49] I'd revdel it [16:30:51] or just note that we don't really have full policies on this stuff yet, and BLP RevDels are pretty much intuitive [16:31:23] Moe_Epsilon: You do now the Viking story in relation with the semantic web? ;-) [16:31:26] I´ve done it [16:31:47] both revdel´ed revision text and summary [16:32:09] ok :) i left the IP an only warning [16:32:20] lol I'd go on, but I really have to be heading out xD I'll be back in about 6 hours [16:33:53] Wiki13: any clue on the rollback question, though? i clicked rollback on the first diff (since i loaded it before the IP made the second edit), and it reverted both. is that supposed to happen? [16:34:49] I´ve seen that happen many times at my homewiki PinkAmpersand [16:34:56] so maybe yes... [16:35:05] oh ok. for some reason i thought it didn't happen. [16:35:21] i've had rollback for like 3 months now. i should know better. [16:35:29] haha [16:36:00] weird. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q899121&curid=849943&diff=7603048&oldid=6297164&rcid=7616402 second test edit I've seen to a "tourism in" item [17:15:09] multichill: whats wrong with my empty item detection? [17:16:09] legoktm: It marked items like https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5260256 as empty [17:16:23] it has no sitelinks [17:16:42] did the policy get changed? [17:16:46] It's referenced from several other objects [17:17:02] the notability policy is that it has to have at least 2 sitelink [17:17:08] er 1* [17:18:22] legoktm: Not true, we only have the now obsolete https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Notability [17:18:42] sigh [17:18:53] * legoktm wishes people told me about when things change [17:19:08] ill change my bot then [17:19:24] Took me quite some time to figure out why all the trees broke :-( [17:19:29] oops sorry :P [17:20:09] disabled for now, ill fix it later [17:20:10] Could anyone please check my deleted contributions if some of the people are still deleted? I still seem to be missing some paths [17:20:15] yeah [17:20:15] sure [17:20:37] you only have properties [17:20:42] do you want me to check your bot? [17:21:14] No, just me [17:21:14] your bot has none [17:21:26] Bot takes it from interwiki's anyway. Thanks for checking [17:21:29] all your deleted contributions are to Properties [17:21:42] That's ok. [17:21:53] Something fishy going on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Multichill/Charlemagne contains loops [17:21:59] Time travel! [17:23:16] :P [19:01:50] help... [19:02:00] how do i nom something for speedy deletion? [19:02:22] link it here :) [19:02:24] or WD:RFD [19:02:28] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5274569 [19:02:58] done [19:03:03] i accidentally created a duplicate since the original didn't have a label [19:03:05] thanks [19:04:04] another question...i know that in programming, english is the preferred language regardless of the programmer's language. is the same true of wikidata? [19:05:24] wikidata is multilingual [19:05:34] descriptions can be added in any language [19:05:41] okay so it's not a problem if i create one in french since i can't translate it [19:05:43] and get displayed to the user depending on their language [19:06:01] just make sure you add the description to the right language [19:06:06] you can use Label lister to help [19:06:13] ? [19:06:23] in gadgets [19:06:24] okay so here's an example: http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3269712 [19:06:28] enable one called "Label lister" [19:06:33] walk me through what i should have done [19:06:40] ok so [19:06:47] the problem is the "en" description is in french [19:07:02] right. i don't really know what it means in english [19:07:09] since i don't know french [19:07:12] if you use labellister youll see something like http://cl.ly/image/121X0a2v2t0E [19:07:25] ooooo [19:08:07] okay, just now enabled that [19:08:16] from that point, you just need to use the edit button and copy+paste to move the label correctly [19:08:24] er description [19:08:36] Are categories supposed to get interwikilinks from wikidata? [19:09:03] like so? [19:09:35] ZorroIII: yes [19:09:56] BobTheWikipedian: yup! [19:10:00] :D [19:10:01] also, cool feature [19:10:08] if you have #babel boxes on your user page [19:10:20] and then someone who knows both languages on a task force will come through and fix it, right? [19:10:33] you see stuff like http://cl.ly/image/2P2F0Y0t0w2v (en/es/gu are in my babel) [19:10:41] yeah hopefully [19:10:49] oooo cool [19:10:53] I've found no categories on enwiki with interwikis from wikidata. I've might have looked at too few, though [19:11:12] ZorroIII: i've created a bunch [19:11:43] like [19:11:43] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4376859 [19:12:26] i believe i imported the full subtree of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:National_Hockey_League_players [19:12:46] ZorroIII: and if you have some cats you want imported, i can have my bot do it :) [19:14:42] oki, no rush. I guess I get to learn about the wikidata stuff when wikidata comes to nowiki. Can't let my bot drop on the most edits list [19:15:05] its probably a good idea to learn first :P [19:22:06] do wikidata allow global bots? [19:23:05] ummmmm there are wikidata qs for lists? [19:24:03] BobTheWikipedian: qs? [19:24:06] ZorroIII: no [19:24:21] global bots are usually interwiki, and wikidata doesnt need global bots :P [19:24:22] q numbers [19:24:37] http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1854807 [19:25:11] yes, any page on a wikipedia can get an item as long as it isnt userspace [19:25:23] hmmm. what properties should i add to this? [19:25:31] New review: John Erling Blad; "(1 comment)" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [19:25:35] probably none [19:26:46] New review: John Erling Blad; "I think labels and descriptions are the signature of the page and should go in the same special page..." [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [19:50:33] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Add MessageReporter since core CR is slow as usual" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50627 [19:50:34] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Registered Wikibase\Repo\Database classes and added test for FieldDefinition" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50628 [19:52:23] Change abandoned: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no reason)" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50627 [19:52:28] Change abandoned: Jeroen De Dauw; "(no reason)" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50628 [19:52:56] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Add MessageReporter since core CR is slow as usual" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50629 [19:53:21] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Registered Wikibase\Repo\Database classes and added test for FieldDefinition" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50630 [20:03:52] Has anyone heard of OmegaWiki? [20:04:52] yeah [20:04:59] someone posted on wikimedia-l about it i think [20:05:33] Did it used to an extension that used to be called Wikidata? [20:05:38] *used an [20:05:45] no clue [20:05:51] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:WikiLexicalData [20:06:07] :o [20:07:32] Here's the page on meta, https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OmegaWiki [20:08:07] The lead developer is Erik Möller [20:08:40] And now there's a proposal for the WMF to host it [20:08:56] hm [20:08:59] seems interesting [20:15:24] hey, can we set up an abusefilter to tag edits that change descriptions to language names, country names, or demonyms? it seems to be a fairly common type of test edit [20:15:36] um [20:15:41] not yet [20:16:01] ok :( [20:16:10] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45252 [20:16:44] legoktm: why not just do it based on edit summaries? [20:16:58] i um [20:17:04] i guess you could [20:17:19] :P [20:17:23] only a bot can spoof them, so it should work just as well [20:17:48] (or someone running a script) [20:19:16] New patchset: Tpt; "Allows to restrict output in Special:EntitiesWithoutLabels to a specific entity type" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [20:19:59] legoktm: oh, doesn't that mean that we can make my "new editor removing sitelink" filter now? [20:20:08] probably [20:20:17] let me test [20:20:29] i wish we had a test.wikidata.org [20:22:25] ok [20:22:28] this is simple :) [20:23:00] New review: Tpt; "Add a label to the select entry for all types." [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50491 [20:23:25] user_editcount < 5 & [20:23:25] "wbsetsitelink-remove" in summary [20:25:06] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Added TableDefinitionTest" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50634 [20:25:06] New patchset: Jeroen De Dauw; "Added TableBuilderTest" [mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50635 [20:25:32] PinkAmpersand: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchFilter=10 [20:26:06] legoktm: might as well just go off of user rights. some people remove like 20 links in a row from one item, so... [20:26:27] PinkAmpersand, we have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/8 for adding languages to descriptions [20:26:27] right [20:26:32] so the first 5 get caught [20:26:55] legoktm: but why not just go for everyone who's not an autopatroller? [20:27:12] lets see how much this picks up for now [20:27:20] and then reassess in a day [20:27:48] ok :) [20:28:05] techman224: oh. awesome. mind adding Danish? (that happens to be the one I've seen most recently) [20:28:24] hm [20:28:27] how do i create a new tag? [20:28:55] legoktm, just write one [20:29:02] just add it in the abusefilter? [20:29:06] and itll get created? [20:29:37] PinkAmpersand, done [20:29:42] thx :) [20:30:32] hey look, it worked [20:31:34] legoktm: should i leave a note about the workaround on the bug? [20:31:47] if you want [20:39:39] legoktm: could you maybe get legobot to automatically add RfAutopatrols for anyone with 150+ edits who's never been blocked? [20:39:48] um [20:39:57] i had a better idea [20:40:02] i was going to set pu [20:40:06] set up* [20:40:27] something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Editors_eligible_for_Autopatrol_privilege [20:40:32] but just with edit count [20:40:58] oh that sounds like a good idea [20:43:04] just waiting on some changes to the database-reports code :) [21:23:23] hey, techman224, is there something you could set on [[MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-8]], so the special pages preload the item ID? like [[Special:SetLabel/$1]] or something [21:23:24] 10[1] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Abusefilter%2Dwarning%2D813 => [21:23:25] 10[2] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/Special:SetLabel/%241 [21:27:07] um [21:27:09] i think so [21:27:24] does abusefilter send arguments? [21:29:08] legoktm: well it's a message that appears, right? so i don't think it should matter what triggers it [21:29:19] it does [21:30:18] Could we send page title? [21:30:22] oh ok [21:30:34] {{CurrentPage}}? [21:30:35] 10[3] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/Template:CurrentPage [21:31:31] It would be {{PAGENAME}} [21:31:31] 10[4] 10https://wikidata.org/wiki/Template:PAGENAME [21:33:34] * PinkAmpersand shoots AsimovBot over and over again [21:33:47] try testing it [21:33:50] see what you've made me do? Asimov is my favorite author [21:35:05] PinkAmpersand, I think I got it [21:35:09] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-8 [21:38:07] techman224: yay! except shouldn't it be FULLPAGENAME, so it works for properties too? [21:42:05] PinkAmpersand, doesn't FULLPAGENAME print out the namespace name if the entry is in mainspace? [21:43:35] um [21:43:40] mainspace has no namespacename [21:45:55] PinkAmpersand: gonna do that P: thing now [21:47:33] :D [21:47:44] srsly though, i can haz FULLPAGENAME? [21:49:45] oh yeah [21:49:46] give me a sec [21:50:14] done [21:50:33] Hey I was doing it too [21:50:44] :P [21:51:02] just how it's supposed to be. 2 admins for every task that needs doing. [21:53:19] PinkAmpersand: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/50709/ [21:54:24] thanks lego! :) [21:55:05] np [21:58:11] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/Missing_links/enwiki <-- this is taking a really long time [21:58:44] i ran it right at the beginning of january and it took like 2 minutes [22:02:37] legoktm, isn't there many more data entries since then? [22:02:48] yeahhhh [22:03:04] took ~30min for dewiki [22:03:28] legoktm: fixed the top one. removed by some n00b [22:03:52] haha [22:03:55] its a useful report! [22:04:17] you can even choose what languages get reports [22:04:44] hm [22:04:48] itwiki took 6 minutes [22:07:00]