[02:21:56] Hey, we have an item for "poem" and an item for "poetry", I assume that I should be using "poem" for P31 (instance of), but "poetry" is used by far more Wikis [02:22:08] er.. has articles in far more Wikis [08:29:44] (03CR) 10Jeroen De Dauw: [C: 032] remove use MWException which is not used [extensions/WikibaseDataModel] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/86439 (owner: 10Aude) [09:31:50] the values are start date, predessesor, end date and successor [09:32:05] they are used extensively in many infoboxes [09:39:52] GerardM: well, those are multiple claims [09:40:15] but some properties of an object may have multiple components [09:40:22] they are interrelated [09:41:30] a claim like an "office held" can be repeated many times for many functions [09:42:02] lol, a node package with a 1999 copyright [09:42:22] in my opinion, the date of birth, date of death are claims that go with "instance of" "person" [09:42:32] also sex and maybe a few others [09:43:09] spouse could go with a start date, a name change ... children [09:48:58] this could then be used to make properties of this new data type [09:49:17] it would save a lot of reprogramming on the PHP level because we could do it on-wiki instead [09:49:49] why program if you can model it with qualifiers ? [09:51:04] what you could do is have preferred statements to go with what is essentially a combination [09:51:19] is that what you mean / [09:51:21] ? [10:05:47] I know about OOP but I do not see your point when the organisation in code gets in the way of the Wiki approach [10:06:13] Lydia_WMDE: so now we need new conspiracy theories involving KDE? [10:06:31] congratulations Lydia_WMDE [10:06:40] Would you rather see a long list of qualifiers or one clean name of the datatype? [10:06:46] bossing around both Wikidata and KDE :) [13:43:45] aude: can't mnake the 16:30 date with diederik. [13:43:55] 17:00 would work though [13:44:03] hmmm [13:44:18] no point in chatting with him, without you [13:45:32] well, i'm no expert on hadoop or myrrix myself [13:45:38] DanielK_WMDE: can you email him back [13:45:48] another day is okay too [15:06:04] aude: hangout? [15:06:47] morning all [15:07:24] today? now? [15:07:29] lazowik: i see you want a review? ;p [15:16:57] :O [15:17:06] lazowik: that looks older then me [22:25:01] tl;dr