[19:43:57] Can I vote for my own proposal in the naming contest? :) [19:44:23] well, you proposed it... [19:44:45] Well, if I proposed it, does it count as a vote? [19:45:01] Yes. (re @amire80: Well, if I proposed it, does it count as a vote?) [19:45:01] What if it doesn't count as a vote, and it's one vote away from winning? [19:45:03] What then? [19:45:07] Recount? [19:45:11] Supreme court case? [19:45:30] Civil disobedience? [19:45:48] More seriously, [19:45:54] Yes, your proposal counts as a vote :) [19:46:09] Aha! I can save some time then :) (re @wmtelegram_bot: Yes, your proposal counts as a vote :)) [19:46:13] Thanks [19:46:56] Is there a mechanism by which we can quickly see the count of supports across proposals? [19:47:33] There are a bunch that are listed as "Proposed by Amire80", even though I actually reused some of them from older proposals for projects that would host a global template repo, or code, or stuff like that. [19:47:40] @Mahir256, unfortunately not. [19:48:07] I kind of thought that it's intentional to use * and not #. Isn't it? [19:48:40] Semi-intentional - that's the way the existing gadget (which we forked) worked. [19:49:10] Feel free to remove the "proposed by amire" line and, to be extra nice, add a respective line to the discussion section (re @amire80: There are a bunch that are listed as "Proposed by Amire80", even though I actually reused some of them from older proposals for projects that would host a global template repo, or code, or stuff like that.) [19:49:31] Aha! OK. (re @vrandecic: Feel free to remove the "proposed by amire" line and, to be extra nice, add a respective line to the discussion section) [19:51:01] Thanks! [19:53:33] there are currently 27 proposals, 9 have 3 votes. Anyone have a feeling, better to have 18 proposals and put the cut off at 4 votes, or better to keep the 27 for now? [19:59:36] I think that there are five interesting proposals. (re @wmtelegram_bot: there are currently 27 proposals, 9 have 3 votes. Anyone have a feeling, better to have 18 proposals and put the cut off at 4 votes, or better to keep the 27 for now?) [20:00:32] Most of the people chose Wikilambda. [20:03:50] I will rather choose 10 as a threshold for second round. (re @wmtelegram_bot: there are currently 27 proposals, 9 have 3 votes. Anyone have a feeling, better to have 18 proposals and put the cut off at 4 votes, or better to keep the 27 for now?) [20:07:50] We're putting the "Top 6" into round 2. The question here is: how many should we display on the main voting page. I.e. out of the 140+ proposals, the rest of them are on the "/More proposals" subpage, and would be moved to the main vote page if they got more votes than [cut-off number]. Should the [cut-off number] be 3 votes, or 4 votes? [20:08:20] (during round 1) [20:09:43] I say five votes. (re @wmtelegram_bot: We're putting the "Top 6" into round 2. The question here is: how many should we display on the main voting page. I.e. out of the 140+ proposals, the rest of them are on the "/More proposals" subpage, and would be moved to the main vote page if they got more votes than [cut-off number]. Should the [cut-off number] be 3 votes, or 4 votes?) [20:31:19] the rules said we wanted about ~20 entries. 5 votes wouldn't give us that. [20:31:38] OK then, let's err on the side of being more inclusive: let's go with 27 for now :) thanks! [20:32:27] Excellent idea (re @wmtelegram_bot: OK then, let's err on the side of being more inclusive: let's go with 27 for now :) thanks!) [20:33:29] We can include to the main list the entries having 5 votes. [21:49:33] The first round of voting on the name of the wiki of functions has started: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Wiki_of_functions_naming_contest [21:52:04] Do I have to vote for those again, I had voted in pre-selection round? As those are still present. (re @wmtelegram_bot: The first round of voting on the name of the wiki of functions has started: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Wiki_of_functions_naming_contest) [22:10:36] @markus: No. :)