[17:53:51] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> I added "Tester" and "Implementation" to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Glossary , but I'm not sure what their definitions are. Can anyone add them?
[18:19:02] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> I added a definition for “implementation”; I’m not sure if a “tester” is something different from a “test” – where did you see that term?
[18:23:22] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> I think it's test. It came up in the cee QnA today.
[18:23:35] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Thanks for updating the glossary!
[18:31:47] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> ok, wrote a definition for “test” too :)
[18:41:07] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> It appears in a message:
[18:41:08] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> This form lets you create a new ZObject, which can represent a Function, its Implementation, a Tester for it, or one of various other kinds of ZObjects. You should read the help documentation and community guidance first. (re @vrandecic: I think it's test. It came up in the cee QnA today.)
[18:45:04] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Yep, thanks, that should be "text". Will fix that!
[18:45:15] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> I know the message
[18:45:28] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Fix "copright" in the same file, while you are at it :) (re @vrandecic: Yep, thanks, that should be "text". Will fix that!)
[19:53:54] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Now that I think of it, this message is curious: "Make sure that you follow community policies, and copright and patent rules."
[19:54:06] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> ("Copright" has to be fixed, but that's not the point.)
[19:54:38] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Does it appear because some jurisdictions have potentially problematic laws about software patents, and we expect Wikilambda to host a lot of code?
[20:17:35] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Yes, we're still in a conversation with legal about the details
[20:22:35] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> You know what I'm going to say next, right? :)
[20:23:01] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> We host LOTS of code on ALL our wikis in modules and gadgets (and I'd also say templates), and we don't show any warning of this kind for them.
[20:23:22] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> And we don't have a separate software license for them. It's the same CC BY SA.
[20:23:55] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Yes, and the code is not used outside of our projects. So a lot of things aren't necessary
[20:23:56] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Just stating a fact. No idea if it's good or bad. Not a lawyer.
[20:24:40] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> But if we aim for this to be a reusable catalog of code, we may need to consider a few other things