[07:11:29] Hi, everyone! Did anyone else experience these problems with the docker image? Any tipps? https://github.com/google/abstracttext/issues/29 [14:21:00] Armin, the 'abstracttext' git project has moved on (though actually restarted from scratch) to the Wikilambda extension in mediawiki-land: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:WikiLambda (re @designfactotum: Hi, everyone! Did anyone else experience these problems with the docker image? Any tipps? https://github.com/google/abstracttext/issues/29) [14:22:10] However, if you want to continue working on abstracttext, I did myself have it working with some of the pre-release versions of MediaWiki 1.35, so you could see if you can dig up one of those. [14:26:27] Specifically, 1.35.0-wmf.38 worked for me... [14:27:10] I'll cut and paste the Dockerfile I used for that in the abstracttext github issue. [14:40:16] Arthur abstracttext was still linked in the #participate section on meta. I didn’t know about the new WikiLambda repo. I will have a look. Thank you! [15:48:01] Arthur you should update the meta page as @designfactotum suggests. It might also be a "good thing" to add a note on the /google/abstracttext readme about "further development is now being done "? [16:40:44] @Armin - I edited the text in the #participate section on meta to indicate the abstracttext implementation may not work now. The new WikiLambda repo is linked under the "Develop" section of that page; it is also the version available from the last link under "Try it out" - "notwikilambda" (thanks to Lucas) [16:42:06] I can't update the abstracttext README directly - maybe Denny still can? Of course anybody can submit a pull request to change the text there... (re @Thad: Arthur you should update the meta page as @designfactotum suggests. It might also be a "good thing" to add a note on the /google/abstracttext readme about "further development is now being done "?) [19:08:22] I can send a pull request, but I don't have merge rights anymore either :) [19:38:43] ah, because it’s a google repo? :D [19:40:48] exactly