[05:52:28] <denny_wmf>	 We are looking for a logo for Wikifunctions! More in our weekly newsletter: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Updates/2021-01-15
[05:58:44] <Guest63071>	 <Nikki> "All of these have the potential to look very detailed and fizzy when they get scaled down." that doesn't make sense to me
[05:59:56] <Guest63071>	 <Nikki> fuzzy, I assume, but very detailed would be the opposite of fuzzy
[08:06:54] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> logo proposals go to the talk page right?
[09:08:27] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> {{done}}
[09:10:44] <Guest63071>	 <jhsoby> @iamsabas You're Sabas88?
[09:13:30] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> yes :)
[09:15:02] <Guest63071>	 <jhsoby> I got an edit conflict with you when I posted my proposals. I named the files "proposal 4" and "proposal 5", then just 2 minutes before I saved the page, you had already saved. So now proposal 5 is proposal 4.svg and proposal 6 is proposal 5.svg 😂
[09:15:49] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> 😂
[09:16:40] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> fortunately I named the file without the number, if you wish you can get the proposal 4 and move mine in 6th position
[09:17:19] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> I added a better version of my logo in the same section
[09:18:34] <Guest63071>	 <jhsoby> Nah, it's no problem 😊 I have file renamer rights on Commons if any confusion arises 😉
[15:00:47] <CptViraj>	 So we got wikifunctions.org, nice!
[15:03:17] <Guest63071>	 <vrandecic> Lots of details in a small scale, wouldn't that be described as fuzzy? (re @Nikki: fuzzy, I assume, but very detailed would be the opposite of fuzzy)
[15:03:41] <Guest63071>	 <vrandecic> "fisselig" I might say in German, but I grew up in the south
[15:03:57] <Guest63071>	 <vrandecic> Maybe "busy" is a better word here?
[15:07:20] <Guest63071>	 <Nikki> oh, if you meant busy then I totally misunderstood it D:
[15:07:49] <Guest63071>	 <Nikki> to me fuzzy would be blurry
[15:07:56] <Guest63071>	 <vrandecic> I'll change it on wiki to "busy"
[15:09:03] <Guest63071>	 <vrandecic> For me it's like the hair on a fur: too many details to be perceived individually
[15:14:49] <Guest63071>	 <Nikki> now I'm thinking of something ages ago where suddenly lots of people on Twitter realised that Americans generally think of frowning as being something you do with your mouth and Brits generally think it's something you do with your eyebrows and neither side realised the other side was using it differently and found it totally absurd... language is so strange :D
[15:38:10] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> uhm, commons render svg strangely https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikifunctions_Logo_Proposal_%CE%BB_(overdot).svg
[15:39:25] <Guest63071>	 <iamsabas> on chrome it renders normally
[15:57:27] <denny_wmf>	 @CptViraj Yes we did! :)
[16:02:51] <wm-bb>	 <jhsoby> Am I too rude? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbstract_Wikipedia%2FWikifunctions_logo_concept&type=revision&diff=20967762&oldid=20967761
[16:03:29] <wm-bb>	 <mahir256> No I don't think so (re @jhsoby: Am I too rude? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbstract_Wikipedia%2FWikifunctions_logo_concept&type=revision&diff=20967762&oldid=20967761)
[16:13:35] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> I don't think you're being rude at all
[16:15:21] <wm-bb>	 <jhsoby> ok, good 😊
[18:27:47] <wm-bb>	 <moebeus> love it Jon! : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/63110014/file_2403.jpg
[18:35:42] <wm-bb>	 <markus_goellnitz> I'd not consider it rude, but wrong. At least regarding the W, it's not just a W, but a Wikipedia key visual. (re @jhsoby: Am I too rude? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbstract_Wikipedia%2FWikifunctions_logo_concept&type=revision&diff=20967762&oldid=20967761)
[18:35:53] <wm-bb>	 <markus_goellnitz> I'd not consider it rude, but wrong. At least regarding the W: it's not just a W, but a Wikipedia key visual. (re @jhsoby: Am I too rude? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbstract_Wikipedia%2FWikifunctions_logo_concept&type=revision&diff=20967762&oldid=20967761)
[18:39:10] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> are you responding to the right person there though?
[18:41:06] <wm-bb>	 <markus_goellnitz> What makes you think otherwise? (re @Nikki: are you responding to the right person there though?)
[18:45:50] <wm-bb>	 <jhsoby> Aye, I should respond to the W point too, that's true. My comment was mainly aimed at the first comments (re @markus_goellnitz: I'd not consider it rude, but wrong. At least regarding the W: it's not just a W, but a Wikipedia key visual.)
[18:46:16] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> isn't it verdi_p who is talking about the W (among all the other things)?
[18:48:51] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> also *19* edits in a row!? no wonder clicking previous edit seemed like it wasn't doing anything >_<
[18:53:30] <wm-bb>	 <markus_goellnitz> it is (re @Nikki: isn't it verdi_p who is talking about the W (among all the other things)?)
[18:57:22] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Telling Verdy P not to write too much detail,
[18:57:23] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> A hopeless task. (re @Nikki: isn't it verdi_p who is talking about the W (among all the other things)?)
[18:57:42] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> (Not very rude, however.)
[18:58:02] <wm-bb>	 <mahir256> darn, this was _almost_ a haiku (re @amire80: Telling Verdy P not to write too much detail,
[18:58:02] <wm-bb>	 <mahir256> A hopeless task.)
[18:58:07] <wm-bb>	 <iamsabas> isn't he here or on wikidata channel?
[18:59:59] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> It was, in fact, inspired by a poem. (re @mahir256: darn, this was _almost_ a haiku)
[19:46:51] <wm-bb>	 <iamsabas> damn verdy p noticed I broken my logo -___-
[19:47:06] <wm-bb>	 <iamsabas> yeah I know thanks
[20:08:42] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> isn't it verdy_p who is talking about the W (among all the other things)?