[18:38:09] "See https://t.me/c/1224298920/45156 and the two post below it." This link is to a private Telegram group, and there's no link to subscribe, so it is not viewable, and not suitable here or even in Phabricator https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T272203 (both being open places) without such indication. If you intend to discuss things publicly, but don't want to open the other Telegram channel, please repost your related talk her [18:40:03] Of the 134 members of this Telegram group, exactly 133 are not Dennis, so please take your complaint to him directly. [18:40:34] Yes but all of them would be interested in what Dennis posted here. [18:41:07] Then don't phrase it as a complaint regarding his reference. [18:43:29] This is not a "complaint" but a polite request, because I it's impossible to know what he talks about here or in Phabricator. And Dennys is probably not the only one to answer, if there's the other Telegram channel (but it's impossible to know who they are), simply because there are many people involved in the project, in the WMF itself, or with volunteers. [18:44:13] This is not a "complaint" but a polite request, because I it's impossible to know what he talks about here or in Phabricator. And Dennys is probably not the only one to answer, if there's the other Telegram channel (but it's impossible to know who they are), simply because there are many people involved in the project, in the WMF itself, or with volunteers. It would be worse if each reader here was sending private request to [18:46:53] This is not a "complaint" but a polite request, because I it's impossible to know what he talks about here or in Phabricator. And Dennys is probably not the only one that can answer (and unfortunately using a secondary Telegram channel needlessly multiplies the channels: we have Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, MetaWiki, Phabricator, mailing list, mass messages...), if there's the other Telegram channel (but it's impossible to kn