[17:07:36] good morning all you peoples! [17:07:43] and also the non peoples [17:14:29] Morning TrevorParscal [17:14:41] morning [17:14:44] watching naoko's pres [17:14:48] When it goes online you should totally see Michael Dale's talk [17:14:51] Ah yes [17:17:09] right on [17:17:40] I discovered I had only a tenth of a clue of how awesome his work it [17:17:42] is [17:17:55] I need to rewatch it myself because I wasn't paying attention 100% of the time [17:18:05] yes - you see why I take his lead on JS stuff :) [17:18:28] Absolutely [17:46:49] naoko got allot of questions [17:46:56] how many people were in that room? [17:48:02] oh, i should definetly watch that later today. [17:52:56] A lot, especially with the discussion led by Angela [17:53:18] TrevorParscal: I'm in Brion's "Codeathon wrap-up" talk right now, and Siebrand asked a question about the DataCenter extension [17:53:38] h ah a [17:53:44] how's that going? [17:54:00] "WTF is DataCenter and what's going on at Stillman?" [17:54:13] "Ummm... Ask Trevor...." [17:55:02] He seemed kinda interested in running DC 3rd-party [17:55:03] Wanted to know what it was, what it was used for [17:55:14] Only generic things, so Brion knew the answers [17:56:00] right on [17:56:36] Domas came up to me in Berlin and was like "What the hell are you doing? Why are we coding a DC app? What's brion smoking?" [17:56:56] I was like "ohai... how's it going Domas!" [17:57:31] hehehe [18:02:30] hmm, why are we using the pdf icon in skins, if the icon is non-free ? [18:02:43] *thedj never realized this before... [18:03:12] hmm [18:03:15] that's interesting [18:03:26] we should have a generic document icon or something? [18:03:36] that would be an awesome bug to report [18:04:29] http://www.adobe.com/misc/linking.html [18:05:11] there are free icons here: http://pdfreaders.org/graphics.en.html [18:05:26] but i think they would confuse more people than that they would be useful. [18:05:37] i think a generic document icon is more suited. [18:17:58] ticket filed [18:36:07] hey TrevorParscal [18:36:16] hey there [18:36:20] how's it going? [18:37:56] it's going well [18:38:06] got to get up and show off LiquidThreads [18:38:35] awesome [18:38:48] how was the response? [18:38:55] pretty good actually [18:38:59] right on [18:39:05] any UI crituique? [18:39:09] A couple [18:39:19] tell me tell me! [18:39:30] thinking about removing the "new thread" link and having instead a smallish textbox that expands when focussed [18:39:36] same sort of deal with reply [18:40:00] need to change the new discussion link into a button maybe too [18:40:10] right on [18:40:13] interesting [18:40:30] like gmail you mean [18:40:41] yeah [18:40:57] I've been doing some awesome JS AJAX stuff [18:41:05] like automatically adding and removing categories [18:41:11] i'm really excited that we've got some feedback [18:41:40] a few other things, but I'll want to watch the video instead [18:41:51] also, thoughts about adding subjects to replies too [18:41:54] not sure on that one [18:42:14] TrevorParscal: You can watch the video of the usability talk, it's in there [18:42:36] that you gave? [18:42:39] I saw naokos [18:43:07] Angela's panel [18:43:18] I'd advise against adding subjects to replies [18:43:28] i think it's unproductive clutter [18:43:33] i will take a look [18:43:39] I demoed it there because there was a question about discussion pages [18:43:43] thought it was relevant [18:43:47] yeah I don't agreee either [18:43:52] but it's definitely worth thinking about [18:44:28] There was also this critique by our favourite critiquer of features [18:44:29] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LiquidThreads/Notes [18:44:57] haven't looked through it in details [18:45:12] hope you can come next year, I haven't hit a wikimania before, it's wicked fun [18:45:35] the party tonight is listed as midnight to 6am [18:45:36] yeah, i will be there next year [18:45:57] awesomes [18:47:14] hopefully there will be another developer's conference [18:47:17] like we had in berlin [18:48:10] hopefully [18:48:49] anything on that page has merit, you think? [18:48:53] ^has^have^ [19:08:02] werdna: nice haircut! [19:12:32] /nick FavouriteCritiquerOfFeatures [19:17:21] I agree, that would take too much vertical space to have all those edit boxes there [19:18:42] hehe [19:19:50] i think having one subject per thread is key to the concept of a thread [19:20:18] this guy is talking about flat message boards, not threaded discussions like liquid threads has [19:51:15] i should put real clothes on... I'm in underwear and socks still :( [19:51:25] at least I got out of my bed before noon today [19:51:27] brb [20:22:26] Annemarie: :) [20:25:00] TrevorParscal: how do you know I got a haircut [20:25:03] are you stalking me? [20:25:48] :) [20:59:26] werdna: he he he [21:07:40] Creepy stalker laugh, that. [21:25:45] indeed it is [22:21:38] *Annemarie hugs werdna. [22:40:11] \o/