[00:14:25] looks like toc for Safari is also working now ? [00:14:33] though not yet whitelisted [00:17:30] thedj: toc is supposed to be disabled for all users [00:17:47] yeah, but i tested on prototype :D [00:18:02] phew [00:18:14] you scared me [00:18:23] "please move away from the red button !" [00:25:59] exactly [14:53:53] might this be related to deployments in the past days? [14:53:54] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Movement_in_the_text_box [20:34:32] anyone around ? [20:34:38] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Movement_in_the_text_box [20:35:49] everyone is pretty busy today and tomorrow with the ongoing UX study [20:55:30] grah. editor is eating linebreaks again [21:01:38] thedj: on linux? [21:02:07] no safari mac [21:02:20] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22953 [22:59:25] RoanKattouw: how does the usability project do the lightbox effect of the dialogs ? I might want to reuse it in one of my tools. [23:00:19] It's a jQuery UI theme I think [23:00:56] ooh, RoanKattouw feel like pushing jquery.wikiEditor.html to production in the next like 10 min? [23:01:51] RoanKattouw: hmm, must be some special option, i can't get it working just by calling .dialog [23:02:01] *thedj dives further into the source [23:02:09] thedj: What Lightbox effect are you talking about? [23:02:18] nimish_g: What for? [23:02:19] the grey overlay [23:02:36] nimish_g, how's the testing going? [23:02:42] usability study, next participant comes in in like 10-15 min [23:02:49] thedj: modal flag in .dialog(), see JUI docs [23:02:50] RoanKattouw: ^^ [23:03:01] OK it's just these style changes? [23:03:14] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/64175 --> that one? [23:03:54] font-family: monospace; [23:03:55] *guillom likes [23:04:17] I guess it's for the "What you type" column in the help menu? [23:05:28] RoanKattouw: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/64195 --> this actually tho it's the same thing [23:05:34] Yeah saw it [23:05:56] Are these styles for the name on the template capsule? [23:06:59] yes, we're trying to make it *not* look like a link b/c no one wants to click a link-looking thing, they're afraid it'll take them away from the page [23:07:10] like all of them have been saying that [23:07:26] Right [23:07:38] so we want to see if restyling it as a nonlink fixes it [23:08:16] perhaps a hover element like the links in blogspot.com is an idea ? [23:08:48] you hover a link, and you get a small dropdown that shows the current link, and gives you an "edit" button. [23:09:27] thedj: we want them to *not* think the elements are links (b/c they're not) [23:09:58] i'll make a snapshot. [23:10:22] nimish_g: Should be deployed now [23:11:42] sweet =) thanks [23:12:03] http://imagebin.ca/view/DTDl8v.html [23:12:14] that's what blogspot does. [23:13:13] aah ok. gmail does that too [23:14:00] people might feel more secure with an "edit/change" button. [23:14:44] I would do that with a right click; but perhaps it's just me [23:15:00] mouseover seems more discoverable indeed [23:15:55] as long as we have an accessible fallback [23:17:21] we're actually not seeing people having issues with links tho...they're having issues with the fact that our template collapsing *looks* like links...we just fixed that and we'll see if that helps them [23:18:03] well it was more that i figured the way blogspot handles links, might be an alternative for this situation as well. [23:18:42] it was more the hover + worded edit button that I was suggesting, than anything to do with links. [23:23:59] http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability,_Experience,_and_Evaluation_Study/Notes#Bugs_we.27ve_found [23:24:03] « ctrl-v makes the templates explode. » [23:24:05] *guillom laughs [23:24:16] so that's what happened [23:24:19] ctrl-v [23:37:53] humpf, Ctrl-Z doesn't undo a Ctrl-V any more in FF 3.5.8 [23:38:15] in the iFrame